To all of those reading this thread, I want you to consider re: what I said about bengals in post 98 and what the psychic said in response in post 99.
The point is that as just about everyone knows, the psychic are not "exactly" friends.
Anyways the point is that when I see something posted which seems suspect, I want more information.
In this case I asked bengals to provide it, and he did not.
Today I pointed out an instance where he did prove his claim that the psychic owed CM money and pointed it out in the name of fair play..
As you can see in the psychic's response, he used what I said for some totally illogical reason to launch on attack on me rather than saying noting
and/or admitting that I had a valid point if in fact what I said was true.
I am not going to poison the well, but as stated above, make your own judgment on 1) whether we should believe bengals about the lawsuit
and 2) you reaction to what the psychic said about me in return.
ps If i misunderstood the psychic in any way, then he should state what he meant.