Its Just Plain Good Sense To Vote For Bush. Kerry Is A Total Joke. Bush Values Things Like Family And Decency And Freedom To Such A Greater Extent Than Kerry. There Can Be No Comparison Between The Two. Bush Has Proven Solid Leadership During Very Adverse Times That Could Have Been Avoided If Clinton Did His Job And Wasnt Playing Grab-ass With The Interns Like Monica Lewinsky And Mary Mahoney. Bottom Line Really Is That Kerry Is Unfit For A Mop Job.
Bush is the most honest decent and honorable president I've ever known.
Those of you that have seen The Manchurian Candidate (old version) will find this monotone line familiar. Unfortunatly that's what the bush supporters sound like. You have to hand it to Rove he makes Svengali look like a piker.
Those of you that have seen The Manchurian Candidate (old version) will find this monotone line familiar. Unfortunatly that's what the bush supporters sound like. You have to hand it to Rove he makes Svengali look like a piker.
I am very proud about the job Bush has done, considering 9/11 happened very early in his term. It's hard to believe so many Dems blame Bush for 9/11, after all the failing of the previous administration.
I am also very proud i won't wake up in the morning, like i did in Jan '98 and hear that G Dubb is in the white house screwing an intern, while Osama is plotting his next terror attack.
I'll give Clinton credit for the strong economy and the new job creation, but how good is that new job, or that cash in your pocket, if a plane goes thru your workplace.
Bush has the courage to stay the course in Iraq despite the Liberal mainstream media who refuse to report anything positive that is going on there, only death numbers. They even refuse to report the number of bad guys our soldiers have killed.
God Bless America and President Bush.
I challenge anyone wo answers this post to do so without saying they hate Bush, or the usual Liberal namecalling and black helicopter theories.
I am also very proud i won't wake up in the morning, like i did in Jan '98 and hear that G Dubb is in the white house screwing an intern, while Osama is plotting his next terror attack.
I'll give Clinton credit for the strong economy and the new job creation, but how good is that new job, or that cash in your pocket, if a plane goes thru your workplace.
Bush has the courage to stay the course in Iraq despite the Liberal mainstream media who refuse to report anything positive that is going on there, only death numbers. They even refuse to report the number of bad guys our soldiers have killed.
God Bless America and President Bush.
I challenge anyone wo answers this post to do so without saying they hate Bush, or the usual Liberal namecalling and black helicopter theories.
Good Post Ego74. Bush Is Determined And Courageous And We As Americans Are Fortunate He Is In Office. The United States NOW Does More In One Day To Combat Terrorism That The ClintoN Administration Did In Four Years. Saddam Hussein Is Out Of Power And Bin Laden Is Living In A Cave In Pakistan About To Be Captured And Killed For His Atrocities. The Clinton White House Knew Bin Laden Was Evil And Wanted All Americans Dead And It Did Nothing Whatsoever In Response. I Am Sickened By That Spy Video That Shows Bin Laden At One Of The Al Queada Training Camps From The End Of The Second Clinton Term. It Shows Clinton Clearly Had Bin Laden In His Sights And Elected To Do Nothing.
yeah. its old though. you got the republicans which are typically dumb americans or in office or whatever. they have no money and theyre siked just to be part of the NRA and have enough gas money to go drive and vote. screw that crap.
the democrats. we have the money. we have the girls. and in november were taking back the power. were going to help you narrow minded dum dums be like us and youre going to go do something with your lifes, like or not other than reading internet sources about the fake ass war youve been having. time to get out of the house, and get some funds and chics like us.
you think were just going to sit back and watch you peagan republicans scrimp and save by cutting a dollar here and there from the nation so you can save up for a full tank and NRA?! get real. its time to be with the winners. get some money coming in like us democrats. being liberal means we like all people, and its a chore but welcome to the world of the intelectually superior. were not some dumb narrow minded bunch, we like you all. were willing to help.
so just sit back and listen and stop posting repub/bush stuff like you actually stand by it. becuase i havent seen a real bush supporter in here yet, they usua;lly just turn out to be some sterotypical dumbass looking for a few laughs. so STFU
the democrats. we have the money. we have the girls. and in november were taking back the power. were going to help you narrow minded dum dums be like us and youre going to go do something with your lifes, like or not other than reading internet sources about the fake ass war youve been having. time to get out of the house, and get some funds and chics like us.
you think were just going to sit back and watch you peagan republicans scrimp and save by cutting a dollar here and there from the nation so you can save up for a full tank and NRA?! get real. its time to be with the winners. get some money coming in like us democrats. being liberal means we like all people, and its a chore but welcome to the world of the intelectually superior. were not some dumb narrow minded bunch, we like you all. were willing to help.
so just sit back and listen and stop posting repub/bush stuff like you actually stand by it. becuase i havent seen a real bush supporter in here yet, they usua;lly just turn out to be some sterotypical dumbass looking for a few laughs. so STFU
Last edited:
Ok there Bil the Dope, we got the idea -- you know how to use an online theasaurus. Yey, that's fantastic, but unfortunately for you a theasaurus is incapable of adding any context to your weightless posts and proxied thoughts.
Carry on -- without dum-dums like yourself, free-thinkers like Funk and I would have little relative comparision to base our seemingly high intellect upon.
Carry on -- without dum-dums like yourself, free-thinkers like Funk and I would have little relative comparision to base our seemingly high intellect upon.
I believe that the left is suffering from a lack of self esteem and a lot of anger in the face of an opponent with a superior agenda. All that they seem to able to create is antipathy and insults. I guess I would have anego problem if all I could do is callpeople names.
I notice that Hanoi John Kerry is also doing the same thing as he slings mud at everything and everyone who is even remotely involved with Bush.
The left may say that the right is intellectually challenged, but all of the real thinking is happpening on the right.
I notice that Hanoi John Kerry is also doing the same thing as he slings mud at everything and everyone who is even remotely involved with Bush.
The left may say that the right is intellectually challenged, but all of the real thinking is happpening on the right.
I find it interesting how you, yet again, drag a discussion down to semantics. I suspect it has to do with the fact that, as usual, you have no substance to your fictional debate, so you resort to anything to distract the board that you are nothing more than a sheep with a "thesaurus."
"Sorry there pal, but I don't know what a "THEASAURUS" is. Oh, wait a minute, you mean a "THESAURUS" (you of the high intellect, yeah, right!)."
Which, despite it's complete irrelevance, would be fine, except for the itsy bit of inconsistancy with your "holier than thou" implications :
"In all likelyhood the GOP is going to retain control of congress and the whitehouse."
Sorry there Bill the Dope, but I don't know what "likelyhood" is. Oh, wait a minute, you mean "likelihood" (you of the highly invested in an institution of higher learning!)." Seems to me that you're entitled a refund. :baby:
Hypocryitical clown.
"Sorry there pal, but I don't know what a "THEASAURUS" is. Oh, wait a minute, you mean a "THESAURUS" (you of the high intellect, yeah, right!)."
Which, despite it's complete irrelevance, would be fine, except for the itsy bit of inconsistancy with your "holier than thou" implications :
"In all likelyhood the GOP is going to retain control of congress and the whitehouse."
Sorry there Bill the Dope, but I don't know what "likelyhood" is. Oh, wait a minute, you mean "likelihood" (you of the highly invested in an institution of higher learning!)." Seems to me that you're entitled a refund. :baby:
Hypocryitical clown.
Last edited:
Well genius, if you're going to get into a pissing contest, the least you can do is invest in a dictionary. For your information "inconsistancy" doesn't happen to be a word. You probably mean "inconsistency" don't you dipshit (or is it shitdip, I can never get that quite right!).lander said:
I've been very clear that I will not take the time to run my posts through a spell and/or grammar checking piece of software, so the occasional misspelling is quite normal.
Now, you, on the other hand, have made it a priority to point out every subtile mistake. Again, this in itself would be fine except for the fact that, despite your obvious usage of a thesaurus to impress your make-believe audience, you still make the same mistakes that you critique others for making. Of course, this petty action that you so frequently partake in always seem "just happens" to coincide with a strong rebuttal to your tiresome rhetoric. Not that I'm one to judge, but an observant person might just call that "ducking the issues."
Granted, this is understandable, considering that your electee hero preached an "era of responsibility" that he never once followed. Given such, I wouldn't expect a proxied sheep like yourself to behave any differently. I mean, consider your post the other day - "I am a somebody, but I'm not telling you." You sound like a little kid saying "am to, am not, am to." Your act grows tiring. To date, I still haven't read an enlightening post from you. I haven't seen you offer up a single opinion that you manifested all by your-little-self.
You are exactly what I called you moments ago - a proxied sheep. Except, that instead of playing your role like the thoughtless lemming that you are, you beef it up with dictionary.com synonyms and an ego larger than the gaps in your proxied stories.
Imagine how the Dems see you Billy -- after all, I'm actually a registered republican.
ps - "You probably mean "inconsistency" don't you dipshit (or is it shitdip, I can never get that quite right!)."
It was past tense, so it should have read "... meant ... didn't you."
Perhaps, you should try to perfect yourself before you lynch other for your own "crimes"?
By God, you must be a HUGE (no pun intended) Rush fan.<!-- / message -->
Now, you, on the other hand, have made it a priority to point out every subtile mistake. Again, this in itself would be fine except for the fact that, despite your obvious usage of a thesaurus to impress your make-believe audience, you still make the same mistakes that you critique others for making. Of course, this petty action that you so frequently partake in always seem "just happens" to coincide with a strong rebuttal to your tiresome rhetoric. Not that I'm one to judge, but an observant person might just call that "ducking the issues."
Granted, this is understandable, considering that your electee hero preached an "era of responsibility" that he never once followed. Given such, I wouldn't expect a proxied sheep like yourself to behave any differently. I mean, consider your post the other day - "I am a somebody, but I'm not telling you." You sound like a little kid saying "am to, am not, am to." Your act grows tiring. To date, I still haven't read an enlightening post from you. I haven't seen you offer up a single opinion that you manifested all by your-little-self.
You are exactly what I called you moments ago - a proxied sheep. Except, that instead of playing your role like the thoughtless lemming that you are, you beef it up with dictionary.com synonyms and an ego larger than the gaps in your proxied stories.
Imagine how the Dems see you Billy -- after all, I'm actually a registered republican.
ps - "You probably mean "inconsistency" don't you dipshit (or is it shitdip, I can never get that quite right!)."
It was past tense, so it should have read "... meant ... didn't you."
Perhaps, you should try to perfect yourself before you lynch other for your own "crimes"?
By God, you must be a HUGE (no pun intended) Rush fan.<!-- / message -->
Last edited:
Tommy you keep saying Bush is honest please read
LIE #1: "The evidence indicates that Iraq is reconstituting its nuclear weapons program ... Iraq has attempted to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes and other equipment needed for gas centrifuges, which are used to enrich uranium for nuclear weapons." -- President Bush, Oct. 7, 2002, in Cincinnati.
FACT: This story, leaked to and breathlessly reported by Judith Miller in the New York Times, has turned out to be complete baloney. Department of Energy officials, who monitor nuclear plants, say the tubes could not be used for enriching uranium. One intelligence analyst, who was part of the tubes investigation, angrily told The New Republic: "You had senior American officials like Condoleezza Rice saying the only use of this aluminum really is uranium centrifuges. She said that on television. And that's just a lie."
LIE #2: "The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa." -- President Bush, Jan.28, 2003, in the State of the Union address.
FACT: This whopper was based on a document that the White House already knew to be a forgery thanks to the CIA. Sold to Italian intelligence by some hustler, the document carried the signature of an official who had been out of office for 10 years and referenced a constitution that was no longer in effect. The ex-ambassador who the CIA sent to check out the story is pissed: "They knew the Niger story was a flat-out lie," he told the New Republic, anonymously. "They [the White House] were unpersuasive about aluminum tubes and added this to make their case more strongly."
LIE #3: "We believe [Saddam] has, in fact, reconstituted nuclear weapons." -- Vice President Cheney on March 16, 2003 on "Meet the Press."
FACT: There was and is absolutely zero basis for this statement. CIA reports up through 2002 showed no evidence of an Iraqi nuclear weapons program.
LIE #4: "[The CIA possesses] solid reporting of senior-level contacts between Iraq and al-Qaeda going back a decade." -- CIA Director George Tenet in a written statement released Oct. 7, 2002 and echoed in that evening's speech by President Bush.
FACT: Intelligence agencies knew of tentative contacts between Saddam and al-Qaeda in the early '90s, but found no proof of a continuing relationship. In other words, by tweaking language, Tenet and Bush spun the intelligence180 degrees to say exactly the opposite of what it suggested.
LIE #5: "We've learned that Iraq has trained al-Qaeda members in bomb-making and poisons and deadly gases ... Alliance with terrorists could allow the Iraqi regime to attack America without leaving any fingerprints." -- President Bush, Oct. 7.
FACT: No evidence of this has ever been leaked or produced. Colin Powell told the U.N. this alleged training took place in a camp in northern Iraq. To his great embarrassment, the area he indicated was later revealed to be outside Iraq's control and patrolled by Allied war planes.
LIE #6: "We have also discovered through intelligence that Iraq has a growing fleet of manned and unmanned aerial vehicles that could be used to disperse chemical or biological weapons across broad areas. We are concerned that Iraq is exploring ways of using these UAVs [unmanned aerial vehicles] for missions targeting the United States." -- President Bush, Oct. 7.
FACT: Said drones can't fly more than 300 miles, and Iraq is 6,000 miles from the U.S. coastline. Furthermore, Iraq's drone-building program wasn't much more advanced than your average model plane enthusiast. And isn't a "manned aerial vehicle" just a scary way to say "plane"?
LIE #7: "We have seen intelligence over many months that they have chemical and biological weapons, and that they have dispersed them and that they're weaponized and that, in one case at least, the command and control arrangements have been established." -- President Bush, Feb. 8, 2003, in a national radio address.
FACT: Despite a massive nationwide search by U.S. and British forces, there are no signs, traces or examples of chemical weapons being deployed in the field, or anywhere else during the war.
LIE #8: "Our conservative estimate is that Iraq today has a stockpile of between 100 and 500 tons of chemical weapons agent. That is enough to fill 16,000 battlefield rockets." -- Secretary of State Colin Powell, Feb. 5 2003, in remarks to the UN Security Council.
FACT: Putting aside the glaring fact that not one drop of this massive stockpile has been found, as previously reported on AlterNet the United States' own intelligence reports show that these stocks -- if they existed -- were well past their use-by date and therefore useless as weapon fodder.
LIE #9: "We know where [Iraq's WMD] are. They're in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south, and north somewhat." -- Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, March 30, 2003, in statements to the press.
FACT: Needless to say, no such weapons were found, not to the east, west, south or north, somewhat or otherwise.
LIE #10: "Yes, we found a biological laboratory in Iraq which the UN prohibited." -- President Bush in remarks in Poland, published internationally June 1, 2003.
FACT: This was reference to the discovery of two modified truck trailers that the CIA claimed were potential mobile biological weapons lab. But British and American experts -- including the State Department's intelligence wing in a report released this week -- have since declared this to be untrue. According to the British, and much to Prime Minister Tony Blair's embarrassment, the trailers are actually exactly what Iraq said they were; facilities to fill weather balloons, sold to them by the British themselves.
<!-- / message -->
LIE #1: "The evidence indicates that Iraq is reconstituting its nuclear weapons program ... Iraq has attempted to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes and other equipment needed for gas centrifuges, which are used to enrich uranium for nuclear weapons." -- President Bush, Oct. 7, 2002, in Cincinnati.
FACT: This story, leaked to and breathlessly reported by Judith Miller in the New York Times, has turned out to be complete baloney. Department of Energy officials, who monitor nuclear plants, say the tubes could not be used for enriching uranium. One intelligence analyst, who was part of the tubes investigation, angrily told The New Republic: "You had senior American officials like Condoleezza Rice saying the only use of this aluminum really is uranium centrifuges. She said that on television. And that's just a lie."
LIE #2: "The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa." -- President Bush, Jan.28, 2003, in the State of the Union address.
FACT: This whopper was based on a document that the White House already knew to be a forgery thanks to the CIA. Sold to Italian intelligence by some hustler, the document carried the signature of an official who had been out of office for 10 years and referenced a constitution that was no longer in effect. The ex-ambassador who the CIA sent to check out the story is pissed: "They knew the Niger story was a flat-out lie," he told the New Republic, anonymously. "They [the White House] were unpersuasive about aluminum tubes and added this to make their case more strongly."
LIE #3: "We believe [Saddam] has, in fact, reconstituted nuclear weapons." -- Vice President Cheney on March 16, 2003 on "Meet the Press."
FACT: There was and is absolutely zero basis for this statement. CIA reports up through 2002 showed no evidence of an Iraqi nuclear weapons program.
LIE #4: "[The CIA possesses] solid reporting of senior-level contacts between Iraq and al-Qaeda going back a decade." -- CIA Director George Tenet in a written statement released Oct. 7, 2002 and echoed in that evening's speech by President Bush.
FACT: Intelligence agencies knew of tentative contacts between Saddam and al-Qaeda in the early '90s, but found no proof of a continuing relationship. In other words, by tweaking language, Tenet and Bush spun the intelligence180 degrees to say exactly the opposite of what it suggested.
LIE #5: "We've learned that Iraq has trained al-Qaeda members in bomb-making and poisons and deadly gases ... Alliance with terrorists could allow the Iraqi regime to attack America without leaving any fingerprints." -- President Bush, Oct. 7.
FACT: No evidence of this has ever been leaked or produced. Colin Powell told the U.N. this alleged training took place in a camp in northern Iraq. To his great embarrassment, the area he indicated was later revealed to be outside Iraq's control and patrolled by Allied war planes.
LIE #6: "We have also discovered through intelligence that Iraq has a growing fleet of manned and unmanned aerial vehicles that could be used to disperse chemical or biological weapons across broad areas. We are concerned that Iraq is exploring ways of using these UAVs [unmanned aerial vehicles] for missions targeting the United States." -- President Bush, Oct. 7.
FACT: Said drones can't fly more than 300 miles, and Iraq is 6,000 miles from the U.S. coastline. Furthermore, Iraq's drone-building program wasn't much more advanced than your average model plane enthusiast. And isn't a "manned aerial vehicle" just a scary way to say "plane"?
LIE #7: "We have seen intelligence over many months that they have chemical and biological weapons, and that they have dispersed them and that they're weaponized and that, in one case at least, the command and control arrangements have been established." -- President Bush, Feb. 8, 2003, in a national radio address.
FACT: Despite a massive nationwide search by U.S. and British forces, there are no signs, traces or examples of chemical weapons being deployed in the field, or anywhere else during the war.
LIE #8: "Our conservative estimate is that Iraq today has a stockpile of between 100 and 500 tons of chemical weapons agent. That is enough to fill 16,000 battlefield rockets." -- Secretary of State Colin Powell, Feb. 5 2003, in remarks to the UN Security Council.
FACT: Putting aside the glaring fact that not one drop of this massive stockpile has been found, as previously reported on AlterNet the United States' own intelligence reports show that these stocks -- if they existed -- were well past their use-by date and therefore useless as weapon fodder.
LIE #9: "We know where [Iraq's WMD] are. They're in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south, and north somewhat." -- Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, March 30, 2003, in statements to the press.
FACT: Needless to say, no such weapons were found, not to the east, west, south or north, somewhat or otherwise.
LIE #10: "Yes, we found a biological laboratory in Iraq which the UN prohibited." -- President Bush in remarks in Poland, published internationally June 1, 2003.
FACT: This was reference to the discovery of two modified truck trailers that the CIA claimed were potential mobile biological weapons lab. But British and American experts -- including the State Department's intelligence wing in a report released this week -- have since declared this to be untrue. According to the British, and much to Prime Minister Tony Blair's embarrassment, the trailers are actually exactly what Iraq said they were; facilities to fill weather balloons, sold to them by the British themselves.
<!-- / message -->
