The old man played well today.
23/35.....274 yards
3 TD`s
23/35.....274 yards
3 TD`s
I said this 6 or 7 years ago that I thought Joe Montana was the greatest QB..he was clutch. When I looked at the stats though I came to the conclusion that Steve Young was better but at the time Tom Brady was starting to make a case. It is hard to compare era's. Todays rules are geared to passing. You cant touch the receivers or breath on the QB's. Steve Young's ability to run made him a duel threat and his passing numbers were great.
The one stat for Brady that I think really stands out is his low interception ratio. This number is outstanding.
I dont think you can use Super Bowl wins as a status of greatness. Football has too many players. One player can not dominate a game in the NFL. Basketball maybe but not football.
Realistically New England could have and probably should have lost the last 3 Super Bowls. That would not have changed the greatness of Tom Brady's career.
more regurgitated nonsense from the forum drinker.
QB A lost to QB B, so QB C is > QB A
That argument never gets old
What else you doing at 2am??Lol. Actually I never made that argument so not sure if you are referring to me. Lol. Also, with the name patsfanatic you can't be taken seriously coming into this thread to defend Brady LOL. Can your bias be anymore obvious? Lol.
Forum drinker? That's cute and unoriginal..is that what you do? A little glug glug chug chug....
What else you doing at 2am??
i call it like it see it.
Your argument sucks. TB lost to Eli, then when someone says that about Rodgers, it doesn’t count.
Two faced argument that’s all.
Hasn't anyone told you nothing good happens after midnight? Same goes for you and your posting lol.
I'm an old creep? Ha, shows your ignorance. I ain't even close to old. But I'm not a drunk so that why I'm not up at 2am.
Have two kids, a job, a life. 2am was for college.
I'm bias and you're not? I'm a fan of Brady and not ashamed to admit it (hence avatar), you don 't like Brady (admitted) but your not biased. That logic doesn't getting any more stupid.
Lets pull some posts from your own thread which you got owned in. More non-patriots fans were in there defending Brady than Pats fans lol. But wait, you know football, never mind.
http://www.therxforum.com/showthread.php?t=1116239&highlight=aaron
Post 81 "Including losing to Eli Manning even with Bill and that defense? Ouch. Eli Manning lol. Rodgers would have more rings with this Patriots teams." (The argument you made)
Post 93 "Brady lost to Foles and Eli Manning. lol. Rodgers wins those games." (same argument repeated lol)
Post 116 "I know what you were responding to but my point was that you nitpicked a small sample size and one example of Eli Manning beating Rodgers which doesn't prove Brady is better. It doesn't even cancel out Brady losing to Eli cause Brady, AGAIN, had the way better team and had no excuse. Mr.16-0 with that fantastic team losing to Eli in the Superbowl? Noway Rodgers loses that game and Brady had no business losing that game." (same argument repeated)
Then you move on to Brady has had the better defenses over the years....oh really? They were formidable in his first 7-8 years, since then they've sucked and he's carried their ass.
Did you watch the last two superbowls?? I mean, you know football so well.
The when the same argument doesn't work over and over again, you can always go to the "system" thing ointer:
Where there's smoke there's fire...Lol.
By the way Kobe Bryant rocks! Air Jordan rocks! Brady is just an overrated qb. He's damn good but he's so overrated. Lucky he's had this Patriots team and Gronk and coach Bill.
Peace.
gronk has 2 super bowl rings and didnt play in one of them. although a great player he has had zero impact in 4 of bradys super bowl championships.
he didnt play in the second half of the AFC championship game last year when brady led a comeback.