Congrats New England Patriots

[phdinsports]

My point is all the protections are there, all the technology is available for the same protections in voting.

You've just confirmed it's doable from a tech stand point ..never be a lawyer or a golfer

Just because the technology does exist does not mean that every company is going to use it!? There is absolutely no correlation between the two! Lawyer LMAO. Seriously reading comprehension, you should try it!

 

[Avocado33]

That's the second time you've withheld info from my original post. Typical Fascist lol. We count votes in front of scrutineers from all parties!! Impossible to cheat!

So you want humans to count votes by hand?

 

[crudebar]

Wow besides the most deranged of libs here, it is shocking how many STILL think there was no massive fraud happening.....

How do you guys even nagivate your day in society?

We should calm down and thrx might rehire u like they did Greenie.

I see ur trying. Try just a little harder. Okay?

 

[crudebar]

So you want humans to count votes by hand?

Yes. Everyone knows human error is far less than machines.

Its why all companies are shutting off their tech and going back to a human work force.

Could u imagine if this dude ran a bank(to stay with our example) "you can't accept checks from pictures the fraud will be rampant!" "This is such a ridiculous idea, mobile deposit?! Hahahaa"

No wonder the right never comes up with good tech.

 

[phdinsports]

I also believe the machines count votes anyways. They only get hand counted when there is a recount.

Voting now is going to a station, waiting in line and then having a machine count ur vote anyways.

Not understanding ur argument.

Preciously!

Banks are worth billions, they are for the most part a private entity. Thus any fraud the occurs online could conceivable cost them billions. They have billions in resources so they will employ the best safe guards to protect their assets

An election counting company, not even in the same ballbark in terms of resources and assets. They have received government contracts. Government gives out money like a drunken gambler at a casino! They don't have much to lose when compared to banks! Even when companies fail to deliver, many governments continue to pay them! Plus they don't have the same resources to employ the best of the best for safe guards!

 

[crudebar]

Preciously!

Banks are worth billions, they are for the most part a private entity. Thus any fraud the occurs online could conceivable cost them billions. They have billions in resources so they will employ the best safe guards to protect their assets

An election counting company, not even in the same ballbark in terms of resources and assets. They have received government contracts. Government gives out money like a drunken gambler at a casino! They don't have much to lose when compared to banks! Even when companies fail to deliver, many governments continue to pay them! Plus they don't have the same resources to employ the best of the best for safe guards!

Dude. Tiny banks have mobile deposit. It's not just Chase Manhattan

 

[crudebar]

I love the thought that our government couldnt afford the safe guards and get the best people but something like Waterstone bank can...lol

 

[Bozzie]

Just because the technology does exist does not mean that every company is going to use it!? There is absolutely no correlation between the two! Lawyer LMAO. Seriously reading comprehension, you should try it!

Hey dude you confimed the security is in place for banking no reason those same securities can't be implemented.
Here in oregon a paper ballot is mailed on that ballot you have a unique sku that matches the state sku assigned to you and only you.

This really boils down to a bill of goods trump stared and fox news supported...till they got sued.
Fact checking up on fox news by 400% since the courts ruling...

I like Canadians, good people..but stay out of our politics... we don't tell you what to do with maple syrup.

 

[crudebar]

Hey dude you confimed the security is in place for banking no reason those same securities cant be implemented.
Here in oregon a paper ballot is mailed on that ballot you have a unique sku that matches the state sku assigned to you and only you.

This really boils down to a bill of goods trump stared and fox news supported...till they got sued.


Fact checking up on fox news by 400% since the courts ruling...

You understand he has no clue how mobile depsoit works...

If somehow mobile depsoit cost Trump an election(in his mind) he would be in here laughing at the thought of taking a picture of a check on a phone makes it real.

He will never admit it though (obviously)

 

[phdinsports]

I love the thought that our government couldnt afford the safe guards and get the best people but something like Waterstone bank can...lol

LMFAO!! Dominion voting Systems is not even AMERICAN!!

 

[crudebar]

LMFAO!! Dominion voting Systems is not even AMERICAN!!

And?

So even less motivation to cheat. Why would they give a fuck who wins.

 

[Bozzie]

LMFAO!! Dominion voting Systems is not even AMERICAN!!

Another LMFAO...foot in mouth moment
Nope..has offices in canada but is listed as a US company...

Ouch...

 

[crudebar]

Hey dude you confimed the security is in place for banking no reason those same securities can't be implemented.
Here in oregon a paper ballot is mailed on that ballot you have a unique sku that matches the state sku assigned to you and only you.

This really boils down to a bill of goods trump stared and fox news supported...till they got sued.
Fact checking up on fox news by 400% since the courts ruling...

I like Canadians, good people..but stay out of our politics... we don't tell you what to do with maple syrup.

It was funny how they turned face as soon as the lawsuits came and they lost.

Facts and evidence all of a sudden became important and the fantasy land soon crumbled.

 

[crudebar]

Another LMFAO...foot in mouth moment
Nope..has offices in canada but is listed as a US company...

Ouch...

Lol.

Good find.

 

[phdinsports]

Hey dude you confimed the security is in place for banking no reason those same securities can't be implemented.
Here in oregon a paper ballot is mailed on that ballot you have a unique sku that matches the state sku assigned to you and only you.

This really boils down to a bill of goods trump stared and fox news supported...till they got sued.
Fact checking up on fox news by 400% since the courts ruling...

I like Canadians, good people..but stay out of our politics... we don't tell you what to do with maple syrup.

So all companies big and small are going to employ the same securities!? Seriously now, until your reading comprehension improves don't quote any of my posts and I'm definitely not going to waste my time debating with someone who lacks comprehension skills!

 

[Bozzie]

So all companies big and small are going to employ the same securities!? Seriously now, until your reading comprehension improves don't quote any of my posts and I'm definitely not going to waste my time debating with someone who lacks comprehension skills!

Id think the best security available would be mandated? No
Your argument fell apart guy.

You'll be moving along now ?

 

[phdinsports]

Lol...don't shoot the messenger bro.

Your argument fell apart guy.

Moving along now.

LMFAO!! Remember reading comprehension! I know you gotta get the last post in. But really you can't stay away! I've asked you numerous times not to quote me until your comprehension improves yet you keep doing it! Get the last word in please. Love destroying those who think their so smart. Post away. I'm done wasting my time with someone lacking basic comprehension!

 

[crudebar]

The bottom line is we definitely have better ways to run our elections that would be more coventient and even more secure(though i have never seen evidence this is much of a problem anyways)along with getting more people to participate---but it will never happen because one party wants less participation not more...

 

[SheriffJoe]

He got half those votes. Sticking to that

"You know, they have paper now...watermark paper that's...amazing."

So we have "watermark" ballots (real people votes) and then we have the blank (fake) ballots.

How many "watermark" ballots did "Biden" actually get?

Any guesses?

 

[Bozzie]

LMFAO!! Remember reading comprehension!

That's the rebuttal?
Like i said your argument crumbled