Congrats New England Patriots

Search

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,891
Tokens
lol...ahhh you might want to rethink the banking part of this answer.

Moving currency is pretty serious stuff goofball
Reading Comprehension, you should try it! I told you before, until your comprehension improves do not respond to any of my posts. Proven once again your comprehension is lacking as you continue to respond to my posts! LOL
 

Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2007
Messages
13,708
Tokens
Reading Comprehension, you should try it! I told you before, until your comprehension improves do not respond to any of my posts. Proven once again your comprehension is lacking as you continue to respond to my posts! LOL
You're Canadian, correct?
Holy "F" you come off as shrill..!!!!!!!! Always..
Doubtful i've seen as many explanation points used here..ever.!!!!!!!!!


Anytime the RX golf outing would like to replace you for someone who's "Fun" !!!!!!! and can actually hit the round whitey let me know.!!!!!!!
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
7,050
Tokens
Again rest of the planet does it, why is one party so opposed to it? Terrible analogy using Banks, or any online business. They have their money to protect so of course it's going to be virtually impossible to commit online fraud! They have absolutely nothing to gain with online fraud! Easiest most secure way to ensure a legit election is to show up and vote!!
They have plenty to gain/lose---money. Which is much more important than what suit services in government to many...

Online is much more secure then any form of mail-in and especially in-person. Its once again based on people's unfounded fears/not understanding how tech works and and most importantly one party wants less people to vote not tons more...

Since when does the USA follow what the rest of the world does or use that as any sort of reason why we can't change to a much more stream line approach?
 

Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2007
Messages
13,708
Tokens
Reading Comprehension, you should try it! I told you before, until your comprehension improves do not respond to any of my posts. Proven once again your comprehension is lacking as you continue to respond to my posts! LOL
My point is all the protections are there, all the technology is available for the same protections in voting.

You've just confirmed it's doable from a tech stand point ..never be a lawyer or a golfer
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,891
Tokens
They have plenty to gain/lose---money. Which is much more important than what suit services in government to many...

Online is much more secure then any form of mail-in and especially in-person. Its once again based on people's unfounded fears/not understanding how tech works and and most importantly one party wants less people to vote not tons more...

Since when does the USA follow what the rest of the world does or use that as any sort of reason why we can't change to a much more stream line approach?
No kidding! Good lord I wrote "they have nothing to gain with online fraud." Which is why it's virtually impossible to commit online fraud with the banks. Jeez

And no online is not more secure than in person! In person we have to count every ballot in front of scrutineers from all parties. They must sign off on the totals, making it impossible to cheat!

And no it's no the USA that wants mail-in/online it's one party!
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
7,050
Tokens
No kidding! Good lord I wrote "they have nothing to gain with online fraud." Which is why it's virtually impossible to commit online fraud with the banks. Jeez

And no online is not more secure than in person! In person we have to count every ballot in front of scrutineers from all parties. They must sign off on the totals, making it impossible to cheat!

And no it's no the USA that wants mail-in/online it's one party!
A person using fake checks would be costing banks money. What am I not following.

Banks trust their systems to recognize fake checks.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
7,050
Tokens
No kidding! Good lord I wrote "they have nothing to gain with online fraud." Which is why it's virtually impossible to commit online fraud with the banks. Jeez

And no online is not more secure than in person! In person we have to count every ballot in front of scrutineers from all parties. They must sign off on the totals, making it impossible to cheat!

And no it's no the USA that wants mail-in/online it's one party!
I also believe the machines count votes anyways. They only get hand counted when there is a recount.

Voting now is going to a station, waiting in line and then having a machine count ur vote anyways.

Not understanding ur argument.
 

Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2007
Messages
13,708
Tokens
I also believe the machines count votes anyways. They only get hand counted when there is a recount.

Voting now is going to a station, waiting in line and then having a machine count ur vote anyways.

Not understanding ur argument.

One Party thinks all types voting is fraudulent , if it's not electronic fraud it's someone destroying paper ballots at polling places.
Can't win here dude.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
7,050
Tokens
One Party thinks all types voting is fraudulent , if it's not electronic fraud it's someone destroying paper ballots at polling places.
Can't win here dude.
True. As if a company that is approved by both parties is then purposely going to over count votes for dems.

I guess that was the guys argument. So ridiculous.

Of course Trump is going to once again declare being cheated, unless he wins. His mind/ego can't handle/process a loss. It has nothing to do with someone being this big winner(which people misinterpret) and they can't handle a loss because they lose so infrequently---its a character flaw and can be taken to am extreme of being a mental illness.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
7,050
Tokens
One Party thinks all types voting is fraudulent , if it's not electronic fraud it's someone destroying paper ballots at polling places.
Can't win here dude.
Machine counts the votes---rigged.
humans count the votes---rigged.

Its funny Dominion gets accused of being rigged. The votes then get hand count, get almost identical numbers and then its because dem counters threw out/add votes to have the same numbers as the dominion machines.

Maybe we can have god come down and count the votes for 2024. Biden wins! God counted votes---rigged.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
7,050
Tokens
lol at a person counting being more secure than using technology

Good lord
What makes you think the dems cheated?

"Trump got on stage acting like a lunatic and told me so" Concrete!
 

Nirvana Shill
Joined
Oct 20, 2001
Messages
29,106
Tokens
What makes you think the dems cheated?

"Trump got on stage acting like a lunatic and told me so" Concrete!
You really think what Trump says on the subject was the reason all the cheating happened not so much.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
7,050
Tokens
You really think what Trump says on the subject was the reason all the cheating happened not so much.
Yes. I 1000 percent think if he didn't get on stage during the election and say that and simply lost and gave his concession(like EVERYONE before him) its just another election.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
7,050
Tokens
Just amazing how he just knew right in the middle he was being cheated. Lol.

You instruct ur voters to only vote at the polls. U start lawsuits(that u won) for certain states to count same day first and then ur shocked when ur leads start to vanish when mail-ins are starting to be counted.

This really isn't hard.

Its like taking an under in basketball and then saying there is no way I could have lost a 240 point "lead" lol.
 

Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2007
Messages
13,708
Tokens
The Dominion allegations got dismantled and accused poll workers got justified in court...$$$$....

But when the courts are also rigged in someone mind...

Hopeless
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
7,050
Tokens
Remember this is why Trump started those lawsuits in the first place. He knew he was going to get killed in the mail-in and he didn't want supports to think he had no path and not vote----i don't blame him in the least here and he had a valid point. Judges saw it the same way.

But then u can't be shocked once ur leads shrink and even vanish once that other shoe eventually drops.

It's really not hard to follow. He wasn't cheated. These weren't leads. He just skewed the counts himself.(count mine first then count his)Once again I agree with his initial premise of why this would be important.
 

Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2007
Messages
13,708
Tokens
Lost by 12 million..Gonna lose by 15 to 18 next round.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
7,050
Tokens
It was funny watching poster after poster coming on here and declaring victory over me in 2020.(the 1 to 10 favorite). ;)

Red was really the only one that pumped the breaks a little

A little less funny when some still tried to declare victory even after Trump lost.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,120,458
Messages
13,582,063
Members
100,982
Latest member
nammoidenroiiiii
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com