Charleston cop charged with murder after shooting unarmed fleeing man 8 times

Search

Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2013
Messages
2,755
Tokens
This guy needs to go down and he will. Everyone should be outraged by this sickening act.

The good news is this guy will last in prison about as long as it takes vit to bump another 4 year old thread.
 

Member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
39,464
Tokens
What folks should take away from this is that the cop lied right away over the radio, and then planted the Taser near the body to back up his lie. I don't think it takes much of a leap to realize that many cops lie every day when it comes to making their reports.

IMO, nothing could be further from the truth. Many cops or a small minority of cops lie?
 

Member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
39,464
Tokens
What I don't agree with is this being characterized as a white cop shooting a unarmed black man even though this is what it is.

There's no indication whatsoever this incident was racially motivated at all.
 

New member
Joined
Feb 10, 2010
Messages
7,703
Tokens
What I don't agree with is this being characterized as a white cop shooting a unarmed black man even though this is what it is.

There's no indication whatsoever this incident was racially motivated at all.


Its just as bad as the video store thing that happened a month ago (around there I'll have to look it up).....A black cop was going to buy video games for his kid and got lit up like a Christmas tree by two other black guys.........Thought it happened in Philadelphia or around there....Didn't get as much publicity as other cases for obvious reasons.
 

New member
Joined
Jan 9, 2009
Messages
18,212
Tokens
This is what I think about this here matter. The Police Officer was doing is job, a dangerous one, i might add,

and stopped a violator of the law. The violator ran and then, apparently, tried to hurt or kill the policeman by

grabbing his tools and put the policeman in fear of his life! What followed was bad! The Violator died in the chain

of events that followed bacause he apparently provoked and scared the Policeman. I do not believe the Policeman

needed to shoot the violator and was wrong in doing so, imo! But i don't believe it was a racist hate crime!

Sorry that person was killed! Those are my thoughts!

Apparently the guy ran because he owed $18,000 in child support and there was a warrant out for him. It all went down hill from there. Had he not run he would not have gotten shot. Why don't police departments teach their guys to like shoot out a knee. That was not worthy of 8 deadly shots being fired much less being killed for. I do not think it was a racist hate crime either. Note: you are not embarrassing lol.
 

Rx Alchemist.
Joined
Aug 16, 2007
Messages
3,343
Tokens
Pure murder... If your gonna shoot a man running away, don't shoot him center mass 8 times, at most take 2 shots at his legs if you feel he is an immediate threat to the community and officers.

Lol. That's not how deadly force works. When a cop draws his weapon and fires it is shoot to kill.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
40,880
Tokens
Love these idiots who say if he didn't run he wouldn't have been shot. There is no way to tell that. This cop is a murderer and could have shot him point blank standing there
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,423
Tokens
Lol. That's not how deadly force works. When a cop draws his weapon and fires it is shoot to kill.

Referred to in police training as the "failure to stop" drill: two bullets to the chest and one to the head.

moztrgt1.gif
 

New member
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
40,880
Tokens
Lmao. Walter keeps posting my quotes that have been proven spot on. That Fred Thompson bump has sent him over the edge.

Vitterd 60-47
sheriff walter 0-2
 

Member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
39,464
Tokens
Love these idiots who say if he didn't run he wouldn't have been shot. There is no way to tell that. This cop is a murderer and could have shot him point blank standing there

No he would not have Vit. Come on now. He was on the dash cam. He isn't going to just go up to the guy's car and tap him in the head. Don't be unrealistic now.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
40,880
Tokens
No he would not have Vit. Come on now. He was on the dash cam. He isn't going to just go up to the guy's car and tap him in the head. Don't be unrealistic now.
You wouldn't have believed a cop would shoot someone in the back 8
times as he was running a away and then plant evidence. Don't be sure anything is unrealistic with these guys
 

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
12,449
Tokens
You wouldn't have believed a cop would shoot someone in the back 8
times as he was running a away and then plant evidence. Don't be sure anything is unrealistic with these guys

If he wanted to shoot him and that was his plan all along... he could have done it when he walked up to the car the first time to get his ID, registration and insurance.

He could have shot him when he jumped out of the car the second time.... If that was his plan

He could have shot him right when he started to run the first time ..... if that was his plan

He could have shot him during the scuffle ... if that was his plan

Did the cop just feel like killing a black guy that day? Was he working up the nerve to murder him? Did the cop follow this guy from his house..... Wait till he left his Mercedes, then broke/disconnected the brake light bulb so he had a reason to pull him over, THEN as the psychic this cop was, knew that this guy (who was old and overweight) would run and flee, giving him the opportunity to murder this guy... cause he "Felt like killing the next nigga he saw".

Or maybe this is the more likely scenario:

Cop sees a guy driving with a broken brake light and thinks, Im bored, I can issue a ticket and make my day go a little faster. Pulls guy over and see's holes in his story, and lack of registration and insurance. Goes to his car to check the guy out on his in car computer. See's the guy acting antsy and getting out... as per his own safety, tells the driver to get back in his car. Moments later driver gets out again and runs... Cop, not knowing why the man is running, attempts to stop him, and is unsuccessful with his taser, suspect breaks free after a scuffle and runs again... and in a moment of bad decision, murders the driver by shooting him in the back as he is running away.

Im going to go with #2
 

Member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
39,464
Tokens
You wouldn't have believed a cop would shoot someone in the back 8
times as he was running a away and then plant evidence. Don't be sure anything is unrealistic with these guys

I sure as shit believe a guy would shoot a guy running away than a guy walking up to a car, while on dashcam and shooting a guy in the head.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
I have no doubt that had there been no video, nothing would've happened, but I have a question: during the investigation of the Ferguson shooting, it was mentioned several times that a cop is NOT supposed to shot a fleeing suspect UNLESS the cop has reason to believe that a) his own life is in danger and/or b) he has reason to believe that the suspect may cause harm to others. How, exactly is a 50 year old guy who has just been tased, unarmed, running away at the speed of a 90 year woman from the officer, a threat to him or anybody else? We'll never know, of course, but 5 shots in the back would've been hard to justify, IMO.
 

Member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
39,464
Tokens
I have no doubt that had there been no video, nothing would've happened, but I have a question: during the investigation of the Ferguson shooting, it was mentioned several times that a cop is NOT supposed to shot a fleeing suspect UNLESS the cop has reason to believe that a) his own life is in danger and/or b) he has reason to believe that the suspect may cause harm to others. How, exactly is a 50 year old guy who has just been tased, unarmed, running away at the speed of a 90 year woman from the officer, a threat to him or anybody else? We'll never know, of course, but 5 shots in the back would've been hard to justify, IMO.

I disagree big time.

Guy gets shot and then goes to the ME's office for the autopsy. Autopsy would've showed a man was shot multiple times in the back from a distance of greater than 30 feet. You can't argue with forensic evidence.

Would've been harder to convict without the video but the evidence doesn't lie.
 

Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2013
Messages
2,755
Tokens
I have no doubt that had there been no video, nothing would've happened, but I have a question: during the investigation of the Ferguson shooting, it was mentioned several times that a cop is NOT supposed to shot a fleeing suspect UNLESS the cop has reason to believe that a) his own life is in danger and/or b) he has reason to believe that the suspect may cause harm to others. How, exactly is a 50 year old guy who has just been tased, unarmed, running away at the speed of a 90 year woman from the officer, a threat to him or anybody else? We'll never know, of course, but 5 shots in the back would've been hard to justify, IMO.

The cop is going down, no question about it. What crime do you charge the cop with?

He will walk if they charge him with 1st degree murder.

The final charges will be interesting
 

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
12,449
Tokens
I disagree big time.

Guy gets shot and then goes to the ME's office for the autopsy. Autopsy would've showed a man was shot multiple times in the back from a distance of greater than 30 feet. You can't argue with forensic evidence.

Would've been harder to convict without the video but the evidence doesn't lie.

I agree, all shots in the back, and the dashcam more then likely picking up the sounds of the total of 8 shots being fired... no covering this up at all. Cop was done for either way
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
I agree, all shots in the back, and the dashcam more then likely picking up the sounds of the total of 8 shots being fired... no covering this up at all. Cop was done for either way

Four days had gone by, and they hadn't arrested him despite that admittedly compelling evidence, so I don't agree-and the kid who took the video said he told the cops about the video, and they told him to wait a moment, but he, not unreasonably, probably feared he'd end up in the bottom of the ocean with his video, so he took off. The murdering cop no doubt said, he grabbed my taser and was running to tase somebody else, which is why you found the taser by his body. The second they got that video, everything changed-including the small matter of planting the evidence.
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
15,948
Tokens
Four days had gone by, and they hadn't arrested him despite that admittedly compelling evidence, so I don't agree-and the kid who took the video said he told the cops about the video, and they told him to wait a moment, but he, not unreasonably, probably feared he'd end up in the bottom of the ocean with his video, so he took off. The murdering cop no doubt said, he grabbed my taser and was running to tase somebody else, which is why you found the taser by his body. The second they got that video, everything changed-including the small matter of planting the evidence.

Totally agree. Without the video this goes the way of the Eric Garner murder. The cops get away with it. I hope the 2nd cop(Black Guy, so removes the racial aspect, this is a cops abusing power case) gets punished also. He said and did nothing when the murderer nonchalantly planted the taser near the dead guy. Didn't contradict the murderers police report at all. The kid who shot the video and eventually turned it over to the family is a genuine American Hero.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,968
Messages
13,575,651
Members
100,889
Latest member
junkerb
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com