VD, you're 100% accurate. Restaurants, bars, health clubs and mom and pop establishments have been closed already, have reopened, and are now being threatened with closure again (speaking for CT). With PPP loans (grants) and EIDL loans, they've limped along. If they're closed again, it's over for many. It's worse in places like NYC, where DeBlasio, the last man to the party to begin with, has the harshest shutdowns. No inside seating until at least January 1st (the last I knew)
Take away the Holiday Season from them, which NYC did, and survival becomes a long shot.
Relief efforts from CT have been a joke thus far. A zero % 24 month loan back when all this began. By far the most paperwork required, and their loan projections fell far short of expectations. Their max loan was $ 75,000, took hours to complete the application, had to charge $ 1,000, and instead of giving my client the $ 75,000 he qualified for (using their formulas) they gave him $ 17,000.
Two weeks ago the state came out with a $ 5,000 grant for any small business who's volume was down 20% or more. It was an easy application, I did 25 or so, but $ 5,000 is pocket change.
The federal programs, the PPP & the EIDL, were game changers, they were substantive and real.
We need another round of federal programs and fast, lest doors will be closed forever. I'm not one who usually advocates these programs, BUT WHEN GOVERNMENT FORCES YOU TO CLOSE THAT'S A GAME CHANGER.
I don't think we need uniform across the boards relief for all industries. We need to focus on industries and businesses that have been most hurt. Restaurants, bars, health clubs, movie theaters and small businesses, maybe shopping malls. Owners of commercial and residential real estate who lost rents is another target demographic.
My manufacturing clients haven't loss a beat, neither have most tradesmen, accounting firms have been busier than ever, as have on-line retailers. On the individual side, we don't need uniform relief, many people have lost nothing thus far. Any relief should be directed at families that have suffered real losses.
The first round, which came out very early during the pandemic, was more about speculating losses. We now know real losses, those are the people we help.