He had so much to say before the game..."No smart bettor who knows the starting QB was injured and didnt start in the prior game with no reports saying he will start next week is a fool."
I handicapped the game as if Watson wasn't going to start, which it looks like he isn't. I know exactly what I'm doing.
It was a classic overreaction to the news of DeShaun Watson not starting for the Browns.Great job by the few of you in here who saw Cleveland rising up.
I can say with a great amount of certainty that you don't have the balls to respond to all the nonsense you posted in this thread, which was ALL WRONG. How's that for a prediction?Nostradamus Lou! What else in in the future?
Once again I have predicted the future.I can say with a great amount of certainty that you don't have the balls to respond to all the nonsense you posted in this thread, which was ALL WRONG. How's that for a prediction?
Wrong. They didnt win the T-O battle and that was your ONLY reason for making the bet . Thats not capping boy. Its called Guessing.Cleveland wins the turnover battle and covers.
Two days after you posted the play - and THEN found out Watson was OUT is when you had no answer to Serbone because your only betting reason was 'turnovers'...All I needed was plus 3.5 for it to be a play.
Its about as stupid as anyone can be to bet any game before you know who is starting at Key positions?That 4-0 record below my name was four games I played and posted here two months before the season started. You said back then it was too early but what the hell do you know?
It WAS the ONLY reason Pal....And AGAIN...No one can predict turnovers. Lets see you post them this week for 50 college games and 12 more Pro games..??One of the reasons I'm on this game is regression towards the mean in the turnover category. Are you familiar with that at all?
You exactly - DIDNT KNOW that! You back-pedaled...Its Obvious to everyone or you would NOT have said that answer to Serbone. Instead - you lied and hated to look stupid when you found out LONG AFTER you posted your play at +5.5? - that Watson was out.. It was announced late on TUESDAY night that he did not practice on Tuesday -( Like I reported here in another thread). THATS WHEN you found out. He was still on the lust to pay then. So you couldn't have capped the game that way, liar. He wasn't listed as out on Monday or Tuesday or even on Thursday. Only way later in the week. ...G-Man:"No smart bettor who knows the starting QB was injured and didnt start in the prior game with no reports saying he will start next week is a fool."
Big Lou-ser: I handicapped the game as if Watson wasn't going to start, which it looks like he isn't. I know exactly what I'm doing.
Again! More flip-flopping lies. You are the GUY who says last weeks games have nothing to do with THIS weeks games...LOL You exposed yourself again in the Trends Thread yesterday? LOLHuge overreaction to their win over the Cowboys last week. Dallas was feasting on turnovers through the first five games and it made them look better than they are. Today it's Cleveland who comes out on top in the turnover department.
READ the game report Below, asshole. You won a bet by other factors but NOT by Turnovers... Bud.You know when you're on the right side? When the turnovers don't go the way you had capped them and Cleveland wins outright.
News you didnt even know about before you made that stupid premature Browns+5.5 post.. It was announced late in the week days after you posted.LOLIt was a classic overreaction to the news of DeShaun Watson not starting for the Browns.
Im Not Like You Louie..Ive answered thousands of replies to every member here on all my plays when asked.. Not you... Just like you never directly answered any questions I posted to your threads for years here... And you dont answer anyone else's, unless you can deflect to some other remark thats not relaxant.I can say with a great amount of certainty that you don't have the balls to respond to all the nonsense you posted in this thread, which was ALL WRONG. How's that for a prediction?
Type | Odds | Line(s) | Risk | Win |
---|---|---|---|---|
Straight ^ Score: San Francisco 49ers 17, Cleveland Browns 13 > 4th Quarter 54' 159211547 10/15/2023 3:59 PM | + 115 | [9260] CLEVELAND BROWNS + 2 ½ + 115 SAN FRANCISCO 49ERS @ CLEVELAND BROWNS NFL , Live Football | 400 | 460 |
Complete Hypocrite. Read his next sentence.LOLI wrote this about two hours before the Browns faced the Steelers in week two.
"Don't get hung up on what a team did last week "thinking" they will play the same type of game this week. I see several writeups saying the Browns will easily win this because their run game and defense will essentially play like they did last week when they beat Cincy 24-3.
BUT YOU PREDICTED THAT CLEVELAND WOULD WIN THE T-O BATTLE BECAUSE DALLAS DID FOR THE FIRST 5 GAMES AS THE REASON THEY WON? LOLThere are so many variables angles you have to look at so just don't assume every team will play like they did last week."
I said what I said. I know what I know. Not trying to get people to agree with me because when that happens I know I'm on the wrong side.
You should try switching to decaf.You bumped your thread only to continue bragging about one game that didnt play out at all how you predicted. LOLOL
Wrong. They didnt win the T-O battle and that was your ONLY reason for making the bet . Thats not capping boy. Its called Guessing.
Two days after you posted the play - and THEN found out Watson was OUT is when you had no answer to Serbone because your only betting reason was 'turnovers'...
You were exposed for betting way too early with a "turnovers" reason ? LOL He wasn't listed as out until later in the week and wasnt even on the doubtful list on Tuesday when you posted your play? You didnt do your own diligent research...LOL.
If you only needed 3.5? - then why did you bet it when you could have actually found the injury reports during the week and if the line moved against you - then you could have still jumped on 5 or 4.5? Any smart bettor would definately re-bet that game with the +10 or 9.5 just to increase the win chances. Not You...
YOU also didnt answer the question of How you only need the +3.5" LOL
Try that in the next 10 bets and use the "turnover reason' for the play...DUH! We'll count all your plays as wins, if you just win the TO battle in each one when you predict them in advance of the week on Tuesdays.? Waiting for that, ought to be worth watching...
Just think how much money you can make betting only Who wins the turnovers in every game? LOL
Its about as stupid as anyone can be to bet any game before you know who is starting at Key positions?
Thats WHY you are only a trend bettor... Not a capper. You preach here to everyone about doing your OWN research - yet you dont even know who is playing??? LOL.. What a flip-flopping hypocrite you are...
It WAS the ONLY reason Pal....And AGAIN...No one can predict turnovers. Lets see you post them this week for 50 college games and 12 more Pro games..??
Like I said in past posts.. the team could have covid and you bet it months ahead? LOL
You exactly - DIDNT KNOW that! You back-pedaled...Its Obvious to everyone or you would NOT have said that answer to Serbone. Instead - you lied and hated to look stupid when you found out LONG AFTER you posted your play at +5.5? - that Watson was out.. It was announced late on TUESDAY night that he did not practice on Tuesday -( Like I reported here in another thread). THATS WHEN you found out. He was still on the lust to pay then. So you couldn't have capped the game that way, liar. He wasn't listed as out on Monday or Tuesday or even on Thursday. Only way later in the week. ...
Again! More flip-flopping lies. You are the GUY who says last weeks games have nothing to do with THIS weeks games...LOL You exposed yourself again in the Trends Thread yesterday? LOL
You invent answers just to accommodate your true lack for capping - other than TRENDS!
READ the game report Below, asshole. You won a bet by other factors but NOT by Turnovers... Bud.
No One can cap turnovers and If you think so the lets eee the full late prediction this week win all the games. LOL ! Maybe you can tell us on a live game which play it will be?
News you didnt even know about before you made that stupid premature Browns+5.5 post.. It was announced late in the week days after you posted.LOL
Im Not Like You Louie..Ive answered thousands of replies to every member here on all my plays when asked.. Not you... Just like you never directly answered any questions I posted to your threads for years here... And you dont answer anyone else's, unless you can deflect to some other remark thats not relaxant.
Here is the game report:
Dont forget the SF missed two field goals as well - would have beat your line easily if both key players could have played the whole game. Its why I bet Cle in the 4tn quarter... KNOWING who was out!
Report: Jake Moody had a golden opportunity to allow San Francisco (5-1) to escape with a win, but he missed a 41-yard field-goal attempt wide right with six seconds to play.
Jordan Mason had put the 49ers ahead 17-13 when he rushed for an 8-yard touchdown with 10:58 remaining.
Hopkins made a 50-yard field goal just over seven minutes later to pull Cleveland (3-2) within one, and the Browns' defense followed by forcing a three-and-out to set up the game-winning drive.
Mason was in due to an oblique injury that forced star running back Christian McCaffrey out of the game in the third quarter. The 49ers also lost top wide receiver Deebo Samuel, who exited the contest in the first quarter due to a shoulder injury.
Without those weapons, Brock Purdy struggled, completing just 12 of 27 passes for 125 yards with a touchdown and an interception. He took his first regular-season loss as a starter, falling to 10-1.
Where is Your bet slip from Tuesday??
Here is mine Bud.>LIVE
Type Odds Line(s) Risk Win Straight ^ Score: San Francisco 49ers 17, Cleveland Browns 13 > 4th Quarter 54'
159211547
10/15/2023 3:59 PM+ 115 [9260] CLEVELAND BROWNS + 2 ½ + 115 SAN FRANCISCO 49ERS @ CLEVELAND BROWNS NFL , Live Football 400 460
Complete Hypocrite. Read his next sentence.LOL
BUT YOU PREDICTED THAT CLEVELAND WOULD WIN THE T-O BATTLE BECAUSE DALLAS DID FOR THE FIRST 5 GAMES AS THE REASON THEY WON? LOL
Why didnt you predict those 5 wins by Dallas?
LOL..Read these quotes again^ The Boy is nutty...^
here you go Louie. Now you can keep bumping your ONE win last week again.!