- Status
"bad" ?
Its not about good and evil its about control. Religious beliefs are just that beliefs. Not based on fact but based on faith. And when it allows you to use those beliefs based on faith to murder.... that is a leap of faith i cant understand. And if you dont think this hasnt been going on for thousands of years, open a history book.
Ok, you brought it up - so I'll post it here too donk boy.
Humans are omnivores by definition. Have you ever used a dictionary before?
They are pretty simple to use. The words are in alphabetical order, so
it's fairly easy to look up the definition of a word. So, Omnivore would
be under the O's, ok? Just ask if you need more help.
Hey, and if you don't own a dictionary, the cool thing is that most of
them are online, which you can use for free!!
American Heritage New Dictionary Third Edition - Cite This Source - Share This
omnivore [(om-nuh-vawr)]
An animal whose normal diet includes both plants and animals. Human beings and bears, for instance, are omnivores.
REP doesn't like Wikipedia, because it doesn't agree w/ his
terrorist views - so I'll quote it again just to piss him off.
Omnivores (from Latin: omne all, everything; vorare to devour) are species that eat both plants and animals as their primary food source. They are opportunistic, general feeders not specifically adapted to eat and digest either meat or plant material exclusively.<sup id="cite_ref-humansareomnivores_0-0" class="reference">[1]</sup> Pigs are one well-known example of an omnivore.<sup id="cite_ref-pigs_1-0" class="reference">[2]</sup> Crows are another example of an omnivore that many people see every day.<sup id="cite_ref-crow_2-0" class="reference">[3]</sup> Humans are also omnivores. <sup id="cite_ref-3" class="reference">[4]</sup>
terrorist views - so I'll quote it again just to piss him off.
Omnivores (from Latin: omne all, everything; vorare to devour) are species that eat both plants and animals as their primary food source. They are opportunistic, general feeders not specifically adapted to eat and digest either meat or plant material exclusively.<sup id="cite_ref-humansareomnivores_0-0" class="reference">[1]</sup> Pigs are one well-known example of an omnivore.<sup id="cite_ref-pigs_1-0" class="reference">[2]</sup> Crows are another example of an omnivore that many people see every day.<sup id="cite_ref-crow_2-0" class="reference">[3]</sup> Humans are also omnivores. <sup id="cite_ref-3" class="reference">[4]</sup>
Oh, that was the "crush" you were talking about? I forgot about the fact that you copy and pasted from wiki and a dictionary and that was the counter to all of my facts. Silly me, I was waiting for an intelligent counter. One with facts and all that stupid shit. I guess you don't argue that way. My bad.
It was sickening no doubt. Some of those shitheads were on databases and red flags were coming up in the airport security, no doubt.
All of those "government was responsible" Utube videos are a joke and have so many flaws in their arguments. I honestly looked at objectivly. If you go into it LOOKING for a conclusion, you will see what you want to see, but I honestly LOOKED at it objectivly. It WAS the sand people.
Dilrod posted yesterday:
Evidence of Humans as Omnivores
Archeological Record
As far back as it can be traced, clearly the archeological record indicates an omnivorous diet for humans that included meat. Our ancestry is among the hunter/gatherers from the beginning. Once domestication of food sources began, it included both animals and plants.
Cell Types
Relative number and distribution of cell types, as well as structural specializations, are more important than overall length of the intestine to determining a typical diet. Dogs are typical carnivores, but their intestinal characteristics have more in common with omnivores. Wolves eat quite a lot of plant material.
Fermenting Vats
Nearly all plant eaters have fermenting vats (enlarged chambers where foods sits and microbes attack it). Ruminants like cattle and deer have forward sacs derived from remodeled esophagus and stomach. Horses, rhinos, and colobine monkeys have posterior, hindgut sacs. Humans have no such specializations.
Jaws
Although evidence on the structure and function of human hands and jaws, behavior, and evolutionary history also either support an omnivorous diet or fail to support strict vegetarianism, the best evidence comes from our teeth.
The short canines in humans are a functional consequence of the enlarged cranium and associated reduction of the size of the jaws. In primates, canines function as both defense weapons and visual threat devices. Interestingly, the primates with the largest canines (gorillas and gelada baboons) both have basically vegetarian diets. In archeological sites, broken human molars are most often confused with broken premolars and molars of pigs, a classic omnivore. On the other hand, some herbivores have well-developed incisors that are often mistaken for those of human teeth when found in archeological excavations.
Salivary Glands
These indicate we could be omnivores. Saliva and urine data vary, depending on diet, not taxonomic group.
Intestines
Intestinal absorption is a surface area, not linear problem. Dogs (which are carnivores) have intestinal specializations more characteristic of omnivores than carnivores such as cats. The relative number of crypts and cell types is a better indication of diet than simple length. We are intermediate between the two groups.
Conclusion
Humans are classic examples of omnivores in all relevant anatomical traits. There is no basis in anatomy or physiology for the assumption that humans are pre-adapted to the vegetarian diet. For that reason, the best arguments in support of a meat-free diet remain ecological, ethical, and health concerns.
Evidence of Humans as Omnivores
Archeological Record
As far back as it can be traced, clearly the archeological record indicates an omnivorous diet for humans that included meat. Our ancestry is among the hunter/gatherers from the beginning. Once domestication of food sources began, it included both animals and plants.
Cell Types
Relative number and distribution of cell types, as well as structural specializations, are more important than overall length of the intestine to determining a typical diet. Dogs are typical carnivores, but their intestinal characteristics have more in common with omnivores. Wolves eat quite a lot of plant material.
Fermenting Vats
Nearly all plant eaters have fermenting vats (enlarged chambers where foods sits and microbes attack it). Ruminants like cattle and deer have forward sacs derived from remodeled esophagus and stomach. Horses, rhinos, and colobine monkeys have posterior, hindgut sacs. Humans have no such specializations.
Jaws
Although evidence on the structure and function of human hands and jaws, behavior, and evolutionary history also either support an omnivorous diet or fail to support strict vegetarianism, the best evidence comes from our teeth.
The short canines in humans are a functional consequence of the enlarged cranium and associated reduction of the size of the jaws. In primates, canines function as both defense weapons and visual threat devices. Interestingly, the primates with the largest canines (gorillas and gelada baboons) both have basically vegetarian diets. In archeological sites, broken human molars are most often confused with broken premolars and molars of pigs, a classic omnivore. On the other hand, some herbivores have well-developed incisors that are often mistaken for those of human teeth when found in archeological excavations.
Salivary Glands
These indicate we could be omnivores. Saliva and urine data vary, depending on diet, not taxonomic group.
Intestines
Intestinal absorption is a surface area, not linear problem. Dogs (which are carnivores) have intestinal specializations more characteristic of omnivores than carnivores such as cats. The relative number of crypts and cell types is a better indication of diet than simple length. We are intermediate between the two groups.
Conclusion
Humans are classic examples of omnivores in all relevant anatomical traits. There is no basis in anatomy or physiology for the assumption that humans are pre-adapted to the vegetarian diet. For that reason, the best arguments in support of a meat-free diet remain ecological, ethical, and health concerns.
arty:Yes, I saw this and countered every single thing in it. I guess YOU meaning dilrod still couldn't beat me. Why is it so hard to admit defeat? Seriously, do you know that if this place was filled with people that were not already against me then they would all say that I've destroyed you? You people all hate when somebody brings up that you're wrong so you attack the person that brings this to your attention. Are you a jealous person Zit? You seem to be very angry that you can't beat me. You have C-Gold on your side. That should tell you something. The kid actually asked why a mom and pop shop can't buy good from China like Walmart does. He actually thought that a small store could sell for the same price as Walmart. Is that who you want defending you?
Mix in an order of curly fries buddy.- Status
