Booming jobs and falling gas prices make this the best economy in 15 years

Search

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,879
Tokens
Well according to the actual numbers, it did create a million+ jobs. The graph I posted was about the unemployment rate. Two completely separate arguments that you have somehow fused together.

No, you merged the arguments, liar.

You said the $280 billion created a "Million + jobs" which is a laughable fucking lie.

Your "proof" of your claim is a graph about a survey and a link to a story about a CBO report which talks about the entire ARA.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
Um, your graph did nothing in response to my comment that the UE rate went up as the UE rate went up.

You posted the graph because you are an idiot and a troll.

First you have to define what time period you are using to determine whether the UE rate went up or down. Knowing you, you would use the day the ARRA was announced as if that has any effect on the UE rate.

fredgraph.png
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
No, you merged the arguments, liar.

You said the $280 billion created a "Million + jobs" which is a laughable fucking lie.

Your "proof" of your claim is a graph about a survey and a link to a story about a CBO report which talks about the entire ARA.

You are still confused. That was not my proof of the claim that a million+ jobs were created... it was my proof against your claim that the UE rate went up. You are confused, maybe economics isn't for you.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,879
Tokens
You are still confused. That was not my proof of the claim that a million+ jobs were created... it was my proof against your claim that the UE rate went up. You are confused, maybe economics isn't for you.

No I'm not.

You made a claim, you lied.

End of story.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,879
Tokens
You are still confused. That was not my proof of the claim that a million+ jobs were created... it was my proof against your claim that the UE rate went up. You are confused, maybe economics isn't for you.

The fact that you think that chart is proof against my claim the unemployment rate increased is surreal.

You are a laughable fucking idiot.

Laughable
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,879
Tokens
20097.88.38.79.09.49.59.59.69.810.09.99.9
20109.89.89.99.99.69.49.49.59.59.49.89.3
20119.29.09.09.19.09.19.09.09.08.88.68.5
20128.38.3

The UE rate went up after the stimulus passed and stayed up.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
No I'm not.

You made a claim, you lied.

End of story.

Didn't lie about anything. You are just very confused. I said a million+ jobs were created, then you said something about UE rate. I then posted a graph talking about the UE rate, which had nothing to do with the quantity of jobs created.

You were just confused, that's cute!
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,879
Tokens
I then posted a graph talking about the UE rate, which had nothing to do with the quantity of jobs created.

No, you actually posted a survey about economists which doesn't address the fact that I am correct in saying the UE rate increased.

That is how fucking dumb you are.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,879
Tokens
Didn't lie at all. You just are confused again.

No Paul, we are at example 5,217 of you lying about you own words.

See dipshit, you made a claim about the $280 billion creating a "million + jobs"

That is a lie. There is no proof of that. Your 'proof' is a story about a CBO report regarding the entire stimulus.

This has already been pointed out to you twice, yet you keep lying.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,879
Tokens
The truth is that the stimulus increased employment by between 1.4 million and 3.3 million people, compared with what employment would have been otherwise. That’s according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.

Hey stupid, this doesn't address the "million + jobs" claim regarding the $280 billion.

You don't have to cite the source that you don't understand again. You have no idea, none, what that CBO report actually says.

You are a laughable liar and dumb fuck.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,879
Tokens
Not great in terms of what we needed, but did create million+ jobs, because it was about $280 billion spread out over 2 years.

^ Absolute lie.

I think this dipshit should pretend that linking to a CBO report about the entire stimulus proves that a "million + jobs" were created by infrastructure spending.

What a moron.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,879
Tokens
But you have to love the incoherence of Paul on this topic.

Any time the crappiness of the Obama economy is pointed out, Paul goes with the stupid "obstruct and blame" comment.

Now, in this thread, Paul is actually suggesting that the infrastructure spending in the Obama stimulus created more than a million jobs. The "proof" of this, mind you, is a CBO report which developed a model that uses FTE's in a never before used manner leading to "jobs created or saved." Of course the CBO report doesn't say the infrastructure spending created a million + jobs at all.

To top that off, when presented with the fact that the UE rate went up after the stimulus passed, Paul posts a survey (from more than 4 years ago) which says "Hey, it could have been worse" as if that refutes the fact the UE rate went up. Or something.

You have to love it when low IQ meets topical ignorance.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,879
Tokens
Didn't lie at all. You just are confused again.

You lied.

The $280 billion didn't create a "Million + jobs" and no matter how many times you reference fact check, it won't change.

I'm not confused. You're lying.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,879
Tokens
Anyway, these dummy economists at Harvard put together a very good paper on the topic.

Fiscal stimuli based upon tax cuts are more likely to increase growth than those based upon spending increases.
...
From the conclusion:
About two third of this fiscal package is constituted by increases in spending, including public investment,transfers and government consumption. According to our results fiscal stimuli based upon tax cut are much more likely to be growth enhancing than those ont he spending side. In this respect the US stimulus plan seems too much based upon spending.

:103631605

Maybe Paul can 'lol' and 'lmao!!!' his way through that.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,828
Messages
13,573,697
Members
100,877
Latest member
kiemt5385
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com