You really shouldn't discuss economics with me. You are laughably ignorant.
Hahahaha, Canadian Joe actually thinks he's right because he posts labor participation rates... lol! You are a never ending comedy show. I really should be paying you for this, but if you're willing to keep providing it for free, I'm going to take advantage.
Where's that $5,000 gold at?
Where's that 5,000 stock market at?
Where's the inflation at?
Why hasn't China stopped "funding Uncle Sam"?
Why hasn't the dollar collapsed?
The unemployment rate has never been a rate of those without jobs or unhappy with their current jobs. Not sure what this guy has been doing the last 50+ years of his life.
So do they mean 44% of anyone 18 and above regardless if they are employed or not? That's a rather meaningless stat.
Except it isn't a "meaningless stat" at all. You actually don't understand what it means, nor can you discuss it as we see with your laughably dumb response which attacks nothing that anyone claimed. If you're so smart Paul, why are you always attacking strawmen and lying?
Hey, remember when you didn't know, actually had no idea, that the BLS has a category called "discouraged workers" ? That was funny.
^ Absolute lie.
It didn't create any jobs as the UE rate went up and labor participation rate went down.
You are a comical dumb fuck. You do nothing but lie on this Web site all day and night.
but did create million+ jobs
ointer:
This idiot literally doesn't understand what "create" means.
2 million people not losing their job doesn't mean a single job was "created"
What a fucking dumbass.
Since you have never had a real job, or hired anyone, you wouldn't know.
They did do a study that confirmed that Republcians are much more likely to lie than Democrats. No surprise here...
Did the Stimulus Create Jobs?