Quote:
Originally Posted by jdigae01
Gtown played good in their last two games both losses in OT, and the Cuse loss they shoulda won.
Books looking at this game for USF knowing people starting to tail them as dogs on their home court.
where there did i say the public was all over south florida?? i dont see the word public in the posting at all. i said people STARTING to tail them as dogs. nothing about majority of the public on them in that game. like i said, go get a college degree man. you seriously have 1100 posts here and 1100 useless posts.
Originally Posted by jdigae01
Gtown played good in their last two games both losses in OT, and the Cuse loss they shoulda won.
Books looking at this game for USF knowing people starting to tail them as dogs on their home court.
where there did i say the public was all over south florida?? i dont see the word public in the posting at all. i said people STARTING to tail them as dogs. nothing about majority of the public on them in that game. like i said, go get a college degree man. you seriously have 1100 posts here and 1100 useless posts.
picker - honestly i think your a mental patient. the line was gtown -5.5 you were in a thread discussing whether this line was too high given gtown was apparently playing bad ball.
my post was to defend the line saying that the books would look for money on south florida because of gtowns recent struggles and south floridas recent good run.
people were on south florida and i told you gtown would win by double digits and they did.
what exactly is your point with any of this? i never claimed you bet the game, but i do claim your a moron and im sure i can point to a few others guys whos threads you run into and provide zero value in.
so like i said, i entertained this back and forth too long.
im done with you. your a moron. u , kibosh and uraloozer should go get your own forum and scream and rant. this is a forum about posting plays and insight, none of which you do.
enjoy your losing. its clearly all you do
my post was to defend the line saying that the books would look for money on south florida because of gtowns recent struggles and south floridas recent good run.
people were on south florida and i told you gtown would win by double digits and they did.
what exactly is your point with any of this? i never claimed you bet the game, but i do claim your a moron and im sure i can point to a few others guys whos threads you run into and provide zero value in.
so like i said, i entertained this back and forth too long.
im done with you. your a moron. u , kibosh and uraloozer should go get your own forum and scream and rant. this is a forum about posting plays and insight, none of which you do.
enjoy your losing. its clearly all you do
1) NO I am not fucking kidding you.. right side?? oklahoma lost !!!! can you not read the fucking scoreboard.. I cashed MY TEXAS bet.. OU backers are left with nothing.. actually most ppl who were on OU probably never cash a ticket LOL!!!!!
btw my record speaks for myself and knowledge on the game.. if you think OU was the right side please never sports bet ever again..
you obviously have no clue what the right side is..
right side is when you get your $$$$$
OU backers got shit! 0! zero! nada! get that???
if it makes the losers feel better and go to sleep easier great for you.. after you jerk yourselves off to sleep then put on a big smile and keep telling yourself OU was the right side
lots of action here tonight off the court,
I didn't know the Red River Rivalry could stir people up on both sides, especially in basketball and not football----
usually the "right side" refers to a team that is covering most of the game (assuming single-digit lines) and obviously wins OR somehow blows the cover near the end---I didn't see this game so I don't know if Texas or Oklahoma was covering most of the game----Oh well, everybody move on----I'm over the USC-Arizona State game from last week so I know where people are coming from such as emotion after the game
BOL to everyone
I didn't know the Red River Rivalry could stir people up on both sides, especially in basketball and not football----
usually the "right side" refers to a team that is covering most of the game (assuming single-digit lines) and obviously wins OR somehow blows the cover near the end---I didn't see this game so I don't know if Texas or Oklahoma was covering most of the game----Oh well, everybody move on----I'm over the USC-Arizona State game from last week so I know where people are coming from such as emotion after the game
BOL to everyone
gtc08...
i won't call you stupid, but you should read your earlier post about "you are an idiot for attacking a 19 year old kid".
Do you not bet on college basketball every night? If you can just let something go because someone is 19, how can you wager your own money every night on games decided by teenagers?
Ridiculous statement. Maybe gtc has a point...we should all think twice about betting on games with kids just out of high school. In my mind we should only bet on games involving kids of >24 years of age cuz they are the only ones mature enough to handle injuries.
Actually gtc you are an idiot.
i won't call you stupid, but you should read your earlier post about "you are an idiot for attacking a 19 year old kid".
Do you not bet on college basketball every night? If you can just let something go because someone is 19, how can you wager your own money every night on games decided by teenagers?
Ridiculous statement. Maybe gtc has a point...we should all think twice about betting on games with kids just out of high school. In my mind we should only bet on games involving kids of >24 years of age cuz they are the only ones mature enough to handle injuries.
Actually gtc you are an idiot.
Pardon me...I was wrong
gtc earlier said attacking a teeager makes you look foolish and child like, or something like that.
Still stupid for someone to say who bets daily on college basketball. If you can't blame them for shortcomings based on their age, how can you feel confident in any bet involoving 18-24 year olds. Foolish.
gtc earlier said attacking a teeager makes you look foolish and child like, or something like that.
Still stupid for someone to say who bets daily on college basketball. If you can't blame them for shortcomings based on their age, how can you feel confident in any bet involoving 18-24 year olds. Foolish.
arty:
jordy n full cbb right now...:lol:
