Black QB in the Superbowl

Search

in your heart, you know i'm right
Joined
Mar 21, 2002
Messages
14,785
Tokens
Dimeplayer Sportsbook said:
You are saying Vick is not in the top 10 QBs in the NFL?

I played Divison I QB and also coached at the Division I level...I am no NFL expert, but I don't think you can say he isn't a top QB just because he isn't a pure passer. I think you would have to ask NFL D-Coordinators who they fear most and I can assure you he is in the Top 10.
if you can beat him by forcing him to throw, what does that tell you? i'd rather have all these guys before vick:

manning
brady
mcnabb
culpepper
favre
brees
mcnair
green
pennington
rothlisberger
delhomme
bulger
carr
palmer

vick makes bad decisions. he is not accurate. when he does hit the receiver, half the time he throws it too hard. he is a great athlete, no question but he is not a great qb...he is not even a good qb.
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
20,324
Tokens
Vick is a slasher not a QB. He feasted on weak teams for the most part & look what happened when teams with a decent defense faced him.

You can't win a SB with a running QB. How many have won in the past? I agree with Blue here.

He was so great in college & he didn't win a title there & don't see him doing it in the NFL unless he becomes a true QB.
 

hacheman@therx.com
Staff member
Joined
Jan 2, 2002
Messages
139,218
Tokens
I know someone is going to cause controversy with what I'm about to say and try say it's racist, but it's definitely not, it's just fact, so just read it and try to understand......

You know how there's some great basketball players out there who are white, or even foreigners,that could even be considered a superstar. BUT.........there's ALWAYS an African-American who's just a "bit" better? Well.........the same goes when comparing white QB's to black QB's. There's always going to be a white QB who's just a "bit" better......
 

in your heart, you know i'm right
Joined
Mar 21, 2002
Messages
14,785
Tokens
EveryGamblersDream said:
Vick is a slasher not a QB. He feasted on weak teams for the most part & look what happened when teams with a decent defense faced him.

You can't win a SB with a running QB. How many have won in the past? I agree with Blue here.

He was so great in college & he didn't win a title there & don't see him doing it in the NFL unless he becomes a true QB.
exactly
 

"American Idol Capping Expert"
Joined
Jul 20, 2001
Messages
7,591
Tokens
it is absolutely laughable that some say vick is not even a good qb. either you are racist, clueless, or both. where are the qb's teams that you listed? huh? why is vick's team one of 5 still standing? sheesh, some crazy comments on this board sometimes.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
36
Tokens
Passing

What he lacks as a true passer, he makes up with his legs. You can't underestimate the effect that has on a defense's scheme. His running has to be accounted for in a game plan which in turn makes everyone else more dangerous on offense.

Again, you say that you just force him to throw...but don't you think everyone knows that? It is easier said then done. That is like saying "just keep Shaq out of the paint...." or "Just make Jordan pass..."

vick makes bad decisions. he is not accurate. when he does hit the receiver, half the time he throws it too hard.

Kind of sounds like Brett Favre...but a better athlete and still playing. :103631605

I think the only QBs I would put in his class right now are the ones still playing:

Manning
Brady
McNabb

And of the 4, I can't say I would take Manning, Brady, or McNabb over Vick if I were to build a team from scratch.
 

in your heart, you know i'm right
Joined
Mar 21, 2002
Messages
14,785
Tokens
IDENTITY said:
it is absolutely laughable that some say vick is not even a good qb. either you are racist, clueless, or both. where are the qb's teams that you listed? huh? why is vick's team one of 5 still standing? sheesh, some crazy comments on this board sometimes.
moron.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
36
Tokens
EveryGamblersDream said:
Vick is a slasher not a QB. He feasted on weak teams for the most part & look what happened when teams with a decent defense faced him.

You can't win a SB with a running QB. How many have won in the past? I agree with Blue here.

He was so great in college & he didn't win a title there & don't see him doing it in the NFL unless he becomes a true QB.
You can't win a Superbowl with a running QB? How many have tried? I can name a lot more that have lost without a running QB. :103631605 Of course there hasn't been one...there haven't been running QBs.

What if every team had running QBs and only one team had a drop back passer...wouldn't the odds of the drop back passer ever winning the Superbowl decrease?
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
20,324
Tokens
IDENTITY said:
it is absolutely laughable that some say vick is not even a good qb. either you are racist, clueless, or both. where are the qb's teams that you listed? huh? why is vick's team one of 5 still standing? sheesh, some crazy comments on this board sometimes.

What has he won again in college or in the NFL? Wow how powerful was his division & the NFC as a whole?
 

in your heart, you know i'm right
Joined
Mar 21, 2002
Messages
14,785
Tokens
Dimeplayer Sportsbook said:
What he lacks as a true passer, he makes up with his legs. You can't underestimate the effect that has on a defense's scheme. His running has to be accounted for in a game plan which in turn makes everyone else more dangerous on offense.

Again, you say that you just force him to throw...but don't you think everyone knows that? It is easier said then done. That is like saying "just keep Shaq out of the paint...." or "Just make Jordan pass..."

vick makes bad decisions. he is not accurate. when he does hit the receiver, half the time he throws it too hard.

Kind of sounds like Brett Favre...but a better athlete and still playing. :103631605

I think the only QBs I would put in his class right now are the ones still playing:

Manning
Brady
McNabb

And of the 4, I can't say I would take Manning, Brady, or McNabb over Vick if I were to build a team from scratch.
watch what happens next week...
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
20,324
Tokens
Brady 2 superbowl victories, MVP, etc & you would take Vick over him? The man has delievered when it has counted.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
36
Tokens
Hache Man said:
I know someone is going to cause controversy with what I'm about to say and try say it's racist, but it's definitely not, it's just fact, so just read it and try to understand......

You know how there's some great basketball players out there who are white, or even foreigners,that could even be considered a superstar. BUT.........there's ALWAYS an African-American who's just a "bit" better? Well.........the same goes when comparing white QB's to black QB's. There's always going to be a white QB who's just a "bit" better......
Hache...I agree with you. I don't think that is a racist comment. I am by no means a racist.

I agree 100% with your statement. Genetically, black athletes are more athletic. It is just a fact. That may draw some criticism on this board as well, but I don't think that is just an opinion.

But my point is that I think the quarterback position is changing. If the position itself turns into a position where we see more athletic players making plays, black QBs could continue to be successful and transform the position. If that is the case, we may start to see the QBs in the NFL in the same light as the NBA players you speak of.
 

in your heart, you know i'm right
Joined
Mar 21, 2002
Messages
14,785
Tokens
IDENTITY said:
blue - which one is it? racist or clueless?
you are such a huge moron, i am pissed at myself for even repsonding.

a racist? did you read the posts in this thread? i listed mcnabb, culpepper and macnair in my top 10...are they white? i also said that warren moon could've won superbowls if he had a better team. those guys are great or very good qbs as proven by the standard way that qb effectiveness is rated.

what an idiot you are...playing the race card when it isn't an issue.

go back to posting "GOY"s on college basketball 2nd half plays and touting john kerry.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
36
Tokens
Defense

EveryGamblersDream said:
Brady 2 superbowl victories, MVP, etc & you would take Vick over him? The man has delievered when it has counted.
Does New England's defense not play into those wins?

I am not knocking Brady because he is great and I think any coach would love to have him. But I think Vick's chances would increase drastically if he had the New England defense.
 

in your heart, you know i'm right
Joined
Mar 21, 2002
Messages
14,785
Tokens
Dimeplayer Sportsbook said:
Does New England's defense not play into those wins?

I am not knocking Brady because he is great and I think any coach would love to have him. But I think Vick's chances would increase drastically if he had the New England defense.
team down by 4 points in the 4th qtr with 2:00 to play. you want vick as your qb? i don't.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
36
Tokens
2:00 minutes left

I think in that situation, I would probably go with Manning.

It would be really easy to pick situations where each QB would excel...I sure wouldn't want to defend Vick or Manning.

Brady is great and managing the game and not putting his defense in bad spots. I don't think Manning could be as successful in New England, and I don't think Brady could be as successful in Indianapolis. They both fit their systems well.

With that being said, I don't think Brady or Manning could have Atlanta in this position.
 

in your heart, you know i'm right
Joined
Mar 21, 2002
Messages
14,785
Tokens
who knows...in a few years vick may be in the same league with manning, brady and mcnabb, but, right now he just isn't.

watch next week and see what happens.
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
20,324
Tokens
I'm not saying the guy isn't talented but he is not a top QB in this league by a longshot.

He is an excellent athlete but it takes more then that to win in this league. Look at some of the greatest QB's of all time, most weren't that atheltic or even close to being as athletic as Vick. The point is though it takes much more & right now he doesn't have the much more but he could have it.

As far as the Pats defense goes, hmm when he beat my Rams late, it wasn't the defense that got the game won. Hell the Rams were marching up & down on them by the end of the game. He won it for them.

I would not take Vick at this point if you gave me his services for free.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,116,554
Messages
13,534,795
Members
100,376
Latest member
schlepper
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com