Beverly Hill Bookie , I am waiting

Search

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,227
Tokens
he can keep the money, if he is saying i cant get it back, but i can have 9 more months exposure-

i am saying keep it, and STILL take me down. that should tell you what his site is worth.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
424
Tokens
"the service was NOT delivered.

if we stayed up for a year then it would have been."

The service will be delivered but you want your Banners down, if they agree and take you down, then you argue that the agreement was fullfilled, get it??

Do yourself a favor, write it off, continue your bizness, pay cutomers on time, have great customer service and a wide variety of betting options and all of this will be forgotten. Believe me, this stuff looks very childish on these forums, take the high road and move on, it will help you in the long run!
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
516
Tokens
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Rogthedodger:
_BHB wants off because Major has acted in bad faith against a book._

Give it a rest Lou, the customer wants to back out of an agreement, nothing "bad faith" has been committed by MW. A product/service was paid for and the product/service was delivered. The term "bad faith" is a legal term that you have no idea the meaning of. Do not speak about things you have no knowledge of, stick to scamming people, something you're good at.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Attacking a book long standing book never having any prior slo/no pay history without providing evidence is indeed bad faith. (Whether the claim is true or not)

Major keeping quiet during all past robberies is plenty of proof to conclude he does not act in the good faith of the player.

You, or anyone denying this is complete proof of being a MAJOR SUCKER.

Btw, feel free to show everyone that you don't talk out your ass. Show us whom I scammed. (We all know you'll ignore this, but it is fun making an ass out of a MAJOR SUCKER!)
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
20
Tokens
Hey guys I don't know where both of you are located but you should both try one of these gadgets like I have at home it's called a TELEPHONE, see what you do is pick it up and push a bunch of numbers and you can talk as long as you want without having to fling your shit here.

Try it!
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
356
Tokens
LOL Lou, your examples of "bad faith" have zero to do with a service being provided for advertising. There was zero "bad faith" as pertaining to the agreement between BHB and MW for advertising----all the superfulous crap you're typing has nothing to do with the situation with the advertising. Not even BHB is claiming that MW did not provide the services paid for---no where are they claiming "bad faith".

As originally stated, you're throwing around a legal term of which you have zero idea the meaning of, talking out of your ass as always.

Go crawl back in to the hole you came of out. As for the scamming? The list is long and you know exactly what I'm talking about.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
502
Tokens
As an attorney I can attest to the meaning of bad faith. In every contractual transaction, whether written or oral, follows an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. While this is a legal term, the meaning is far from hypertechnical. It is a general assumption of the law of contracts, that people will act with basic honesty and honor, and deal in a reasonable and fair manner. Bad faith can consist of acts such as breaking one's word, using shifty means to avoid obligations, claiming technical excuses for breaching a contract, or using the specific words of the contract to refuse to perform something which the surrounding circumstances of that contract and/or the mutual understanding of the parties at the time of the contract were clearly to the contrary.

I would say, without commenting on anything else, that Russ acted in bad faith in not returning the unused portion of the funds in this situation, especially given fact that the nature of the original contract was oral and no battle of forms, blueprints, signatures or boilerplate language took place.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
439
Tokens
posted October 24, 2003 04:23 PM
he can keep the money, if he is saying i cant get it back, but i can have 9 more months exposure-

i am saying keep it, and STILL take me down. that should tell you what his site is worth.[/qoute]

Scott, give me permission to post your repsonse email to me and it clearly shows that is not the case.

Give the the ok big guy.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
21
Tokens
BHB why are you on another site in the forums, fussing with major Wager about a contract you two have together or dont have together, you are killing your credibilty, with this BS. think about what your players are thinking if they have a dispute , that it will be decided on a message board. pull it together. IMO i think this advertising will back fire on you.

P.S if you really want it off look up his domain carrier and call and make a complaint that your banners are on his site after you instructed him to remove them and they will put him on notice to do so immediately. or shut his site down.

I had just as well piss everyone off now. major Wager you are a Joke
 

SportsOptions/Line up with the pros
Joined
Jul 20, 2000
Messages
13,227
Tokens
To be fair BOTH sides need to take the high road, to single out BHB for being childish is ridiculous. Major came over here and called him out and along the way also needled one of our techies to go see what was written about him at another site. That was really called for in this situation. If BHB needs to take the high road both sides need to find their way up there.

I have no beef with Russ but there's no victims here. Until proven wrong I am not about to believe Rio is on their last legs as he asserts. That is what started this whole thing. NAB went down when he shared an office with MajorBetting and their forum was pushing for deposit bonuses weeks before they finally went completely under. Not a word was ever known to Russ or Fred that the book was in trouble? Incredible. Now he has uncovered that Rio is in trouble and people are in danger without any sort of slowpays or anything else? Just a little bit of this sort of motivation or insight from Russ and he may have saved a lot of us from being stiffed back then. He knew or saw nothing back then and we all paid the price. Now that Rio quit his site about two years ago I am told that is when the shit hit the fan about them. Coincidence? You decide for yourself.

Whether or not BHB can get their money back or not I don't know but it sure doesn't seem unreasonable. At least in part. We have had checks in hand when we changed our mind about a book but we returned the money if they didn't stay here as advertisers. Maybe we should have looked for a reason to keep it but the money wasn't ours, we hadn't earned it. Anyway I guess I am for both sides working it out best they can and moving on.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
356
Tokens
nepenthe, that is not what is being alleged by Lou. Lou says that BHB wants to pull their adverstising BECAUSE MW acted in bad faith, not that MW is NOW acting in bad faith by not giving the $ back. Huge difference. MW did not act in "bad faith" in some way to make BHB want to pull their avertising. Period.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,856
Tokens
Major what ever happened to your stronger than oak comment "I don't conduct my business on the forums" why are you so afraid to pick up the telephone and call BHB, you have your money and they don't want it back so why continue to pollute the forums with this soap opera? Is it that

a) Your gutless and afraid to call
b) Your bored of watching the tumbleweeds and listening to the crickets at your site.
c) Your Mom grounded you from phone priveledges

So which it is?

HTRC
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
439
Tokens
Pat, I wonder if you might pull up the old NAB forum you set up just for them to get others to send more money. Remeber that one here at the RX? It was a dandy. Maybe you fogot. heheheheh
 

There's always next year, like in 75, 90-93, 99 &
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
15,270
Tokens
HTRC,
No D, "All of the above"?
icon_frown.gif
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
439
Tokens
Card, I did call. I spoke with Justin. I tried several times to reach Scott. He is unavailable to come to the phone but able to post. If you wish, Justin will confirm this.

Another good team post Card!!!!! Keep up the good work.

Any news on Homebets now that everyone is here?
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
76
Tokens
STRUT888/FISHHEAD

with some of the comments you have made lately, aren't you embarrased when you show up at MW to play their contests???

you know what, never mind.....i already know the answer.
 

Active member
Joined
Oct 20, 1999
Messages
75,444
Tokens
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by BeverlyHillsBookie:
Major, please call me.....
Justin
1-800-70-90210<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

applaudit.gif
applaudit.gif
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,856
Tokens
Thanks for the info Major, so Scott why not come to the phone and end this b.s. like that line in the Seinfeld episode. "You're supposed to be the bookie, act like one" This is like the guy who looks both ways before leaving his house for fear of running into someone he is trying to avoid.

By the way Major I have and will always post what I feel, if you think I am ganging up on you thats your perogative. I will challenge any remark I think is moronic whether its YOU, Shrink, Peep or anyone else for that matter.

HTRC
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,945
Messages
13,575,468
Members
100,884
Latest member
68gamebaitools
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com