Betting On Baseball 2020 Season Thread

Search

The Miracle Worker
Joined
Jul 21, 1999
Messages
8,748
Tokens
My take on the question Savage1 asks:


Im at peace and fine with whatever MLB does this year. All the games being played outdoors
all Summer in Florida and Arizona would maybe make me sit out the season as a Sportsbettor.
A lot of game results could end up possibly looking like Soccer scores or Football scores.
 

Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2020
Messages
1,099
Tokens
According to ESPN the league is in talks with Govt officials on when to restart " spring training " and the season within a week. Let's get this thing going for Gods sake..
 

New member
Joined
Apr 3, 2009
Messages
4,065
Tokens
I’m very confident baseball returns by July 4 no later than that. But it’ll be without fans
 

Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2020
Messages
1,841
Tokens
I’m very confident baseball returns by July 4 no later than that. But it’ll be without fans

OK with me. I just want to start betting on Underdogs....popcorn-eatinggif
 

New member
Joined
Sep 7, 2017
Messages
2,122
Tokens
Imo id rather just squash the season as a whole this year. 80 games? Meh. How could any fan want a asterisk next to their world series? I wouldn't. Eff that. Just start fresh next year. Hope everyone doing well. Best wishes to u kevy and the whole rxcrew.
 

Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2007
Messages
34,176
Tokens
Imo id rather just squash the season as a whole this year. 80 games? Meh. How could any fan want a asterisk next to their world series? I wouldn't. Eff that. Just start fresh next year. Hope everyone doing well. Best wishes to u kevy and the whole rxcrew.

I agree with you.

As a baseball aficionado since 1952 at age 8, for me half a season, no fans, restructuring of leagues, divisions, etc. would be a colossal

bore.

I might change my mind once it starts, but for now imo it would be like going to a big picnic on a hot Saturday afternoon where

there is going to plenty of great food and beverage and lots of people you know.

The only problem is that you don't get there until the last hour of the picnic where most of the really good food and beverage are

are gone and about 75-80% of the people have gone home.

Like half a season of baseball, it is better than nothing but really not all that much fun.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
6,544
Tokens
I can understand where you guys are coming from. There is no perfect solution, or anything remotely close at this point. Looking at it from a broader perspective I believe the return of baseball in any capacity will give a lift to the country both psychologically and economically. If deemed safe enough with the proper medical steps being taken I see the return as only a positive.

Anyway here are the basics of the Owner Proposal:


  • -The season could start Fourth of July weekend, with games around the country in home stadiums.
  • -An expansion of playoff teams from 10 to 14
  • -50-50 revenue split with the players
  • -An 82-game season
  • -The use of home stadiums in areas that have local and state government approval
  • -A so-called spring training 2.0 that begins in June, with a season set for early July
  • -A universal designated hitter
  • -Geographical schedules, in which teams play only in-division and interleague opponents in a similar area (i.e., AL Central teams play AL Central and NL Central teams)
  • -A 30-man roster with a taxi squad that would have upward of 50 players available

The playoff expansion, which had been floated before the coronavirus pandemic hit, would increase revenue as it shrivels in other areas. Teams estimate that upward of 40% of revenue comes from ticket sales and other gate-related income.

The season could start Fourth of July weekend, with games around the country in home stadiums. The intra-division-heavy schedule would be to limit travel, with teams possibly traveling by bus to nearby cities.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 7, 2017
Messages
2,122
Tokens
Savage we are on the same page, agree with u.
Mosi I totally understand the economic and psychological side for our country, great point.

I do like the structure of the east how it has nationals, Mets, yanks, Boston etc....geographic wise it makes complete sense. It's going to be difficult to cap these games if this happens Imo...
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
6,544
Tokens
Thanks NJB. And yes, capping these games will take on an entire new look with regionalization and the fact that one has no idea of the psychological impact upon each coach and player. If there is a manager who is not all in it could be a bad trickle down affect on the entire team. The same thing goes for All-Star players. I am certain some may not even play or even if they do they may just mail it in for the shortened season. If this happens, what happens to a team?

Very strange times with no great solutions.
 

Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2007
Messages
34,176
Tokens
Even though I am not sure I can get into an 82 game season with no fans, realigned divisions, etc. I really do hope it catches on, as something

is needed to help overcome the overall depressive mood of the country because of the Virus.

As a huge Sox fan, the thought of tuning on a game on tv at Fenway or anywhere for that matter with no fans, no crowd, no noise, etc,

would seem to be like a baseball video game-to be fair, I personally am not into that stuff.

I shudder to think what it will be listening on the radio to Joe Castiglione(Sox lead radio man0, who doesn't have the best pipes in the world, sans crowd noise.

Most of your aren't old enough to remember the baseball telegraph recreations from the 50's.

This occurred whenever a Sox game was delayed by rain or canceled.

What would happen under these conditions was for the network to find another game(assuming there were others being played);someone in Sox studio

via telegraph would get the exact recap pitch by pitch of what was happening in this other game and announce it from the studio over the airwaves.

What made it interesting and sometimes comical is that the recreation was accompanied by fake/canned/piped in and generic crowd noise which

was played while the recreation man was announcing the game to make the game sound real.

The only problem was that the cheers, boos, excitement, etc. didn't match what was happening in the game itself-in short it was just random and

at times almost unbearable even for me as a kid,

Well anyways the point is that perhaps in this sophisticated technological age, Joe Castiglione and all radio broadcasters could have some kind of piped in

crowd noise which could be programmed to match what was going on the game and thus make the broadcast a bit more enjoyable

and authentic.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
6,544
Tokens
Savage, from what you have posted you are one of the senior members on the Forum. I know there are others, but would say you are definitely in the minority. It is great to have individuals such as yourself who bring a unique and real perspective to life from a historic perspective. So many people have no understanding of life without the Internet or simply being able able to use a cell phone to quickly make a call or text someone. It is unbelievable the technological advances we have made. However, I feel it has driven generations further apart.

it is had to believe sports without fans because it is an integral part of the experience. With that said, I will take sports with no fans over no sports at all any day of the week. With the current technology the networks with make the viewing experience pleasant enough for us viewing. I truly believe they will figure ut how to make the background noise match what is occurring within the game. It is not an ideal solution but one I feel most people with accept.

We will see what happens. I would simply like to enjoy some live sporting events with meaning.
 

Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2007
Messages
34,176
Tokens
Excellent post, Mosi, and thanks for the kudos.

When I see anything posted by you in any thread, I read it right away, because I know it will be intelligent, well thought out,

educational and objective.

That said, I have a question for you and for that matter anyone who chooses to answer.

This is strictly out of curious and to find out whether I am in the majority, minority and/or somewhere in between.

Anyways as I write this, I see that the MLB Network is showing in its entirety Game 2 of the 2002 WS between the SF Giants and the Angels.

The question is whether you and in general baseball fans are interested in watching a game 18 years old no matter what its significance?

In this case, I don't remember anything at all about the game or for that matter much about the 2002 WS either.

My own answer to this is a resounding NO and for that matter any game from the past from any season, regular, playoff or WS.

I would much rather watch the news or a movie or read a book.

If others don't agree, well I respect that-as the saying goes, "different strokes for different folks" whatever makes you tick.

ps And I have full confidence that when there is baseball this season, the technological advances, etc. will certainly help to make

it more enjoyable than it might be without them.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,118,534
Messages
13,556,367
Members
100,631
Latest member
puss-feller
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com