Bengals Winning SB(what history says)

[PatsFan1283]

It is a logic error exploited, clear as day for all to see

If you are too prideful to acknowledge that then so be it...I get it.

 

[exploited17]

It is a logic error exploited, clear as day for all to see

If you are too prideful to acknowledge that then so be it...I get it.

I will explain 1 more time and consider the context of when it was posted
At the time they were expected to win 9 games
Playoffs have nothing to do with the total
If what was expected was true that means they either would not make the playoffs and obviously wouldn't win the SB or would have the worst record in the regular season to win the SB. Even if they made the playoffs with that record it is extremely unilkely for them to win the SB with a regular season record like that
Thus, reasons they are not winning it
If you don't understand or are trying to play smarter than you have fun with that

 

[PatsFan1283]

"If they make the playoffs and win the SB they would have done it with the worst record to ever win a SB".....No, they wouldn't lol

Isn't a good way to state what you meant. Because again, if they make the playoffs and won the SB, it would just mean they outperformed the 9 anyway. The two events are anti-correlated.

All you really meant to say is "Right now they're projected to win 9 games and thus unlikely to win the superbowl"

 

[Avocado33]

They might be the first division winner that has to hit the road in the Wild Card round against a 6 seed

 

[exploited17]

"If they make the playoffs and win the SB they would have done it with the worst record to ever win a SB".....No, they wouldn't lol

Isn't a good way to state what you meant. Because again, if they make the playoffs and won the SB, it would just mean they outperformed the 9 anyway. The two events are anti-correlated.

All you really meant to say is "Right now they're projected to win 9 games and thus unlikely to win the superbowl"

You know what I meant you are bored and trying to be a smart ass playing word games
Lame
Very lame

 

[PatsFan1283]

You know what I meant you are bored and trying to be a smart ass playing word games
Lame
Very lame

Dunno about all that, I scanned the thread because I hadn't seen it in awhile and saw that post.

You could've just said "Yes, I meant to say...." ....Rather than call me drunk or whatever, that's a Bozzie move Ex.

 

[exploited17]

Dunno about all that, I scanned the thread because I hadn't seen it in awhile and saw that post.

You could've just said "Yes, I meant to say...." ....Rather than call me drunk or whatever, that's a Bozzie move Ex.

Sure I can state the obvious
I mean come on
But whatever
Moving on

 

[CHOPTALK]

You know what I meant you are bored and trying to be a smart ass playing word games
Lame
Very lame

Say what you mean and mean what you say. You very much said exactly what pats accused you of and you even doubled down on it after . So what are we supposed to think?

Use Jedi mind tricks and just somehow come to the conclusion you did not mean what you said ?

I don’t even think sherif Joe would have been able to spin your comments any other way

 

[exploited17]

Say what you mean and mean what you say. You very much said exactly what pats accused you of and you even doubled down on it after . So what are we supposed to think?

Use Jedi mind tricks and just somehow come to the conclusion you did not mean what you said ?

I don’t even think sherif Joe would have been able to spin your comments any other way

Go virtue signal about some nonsense bud
Or maybe being down 5 million units worry about that

 

[Michelangelo]

Jeez. We get it.

 

[PatsFan1283]

Burrows will give the bengals an extended run of relevancy and contention, he is good good and he hasn’t even put it all together yet he’s still a puppy

This is the guy I mentioned in the other thread that cigar reminded me of. I dunno if it is him, I said disgrace was his name but he had some weird numbers thing going on. He would post offshore and poli all day then just disappears out of nowhere.

Some probably gonna say it was that 4th booster but I digress....

 

[Avocado33]

I will explain 1 more time and consider the context of when it was posted
At the time they were expected to win 9 games
Playoffs have nothing to do with the total
If what was expected was true that means they either would not make the playoffs and obviously wouldn't win the SB or would have the worst record in the regular season to win the SB. Even if they made the playoffs with that record it is extremely unilkely for them to win the SB with a regular season record like that
Thus, reasons they are not winning it
If you don't understand or are trying to play smarter than you have fun with that

It makes sense, but I don't get why it would be treated as a barrier they had to overcome if they haven't won exactly 9 games.

Like it just seems irrelevant. Sportsbook total means nothing

 

[exploited17]

It makes sense, but I don't get why it would be treated as a barrier they had to overcome if they haven't won exactly 9 games.

Like it just seems irrelevant. Sportsbook total means nothing

The total is only relevant in that teams with records like that don't win SBs
Only team to win a SB with less than 10 wins 9-7 Giants

 

[Avocado33]

The total is only relevant in that teams with records like that don't win SBs
Only team to win a SB with less than 10 wins 9-7 Giants

Yeah I get what you were trying to say -- they were expected to win 9 games at time, and hard to win SB if that happened

But I think maybe it was better off omitted since it didn't apply to Bengals

 

[CHOPTALK]

The total is only relevant in that teams with records like that don't win SBs
Only team to win a SB with less than 10 wins 9-7 Giants

Uhh yea but that don’t have anything to do with the bengals .


And there have been plenty of teams who won super bowls who’s preseason win total was 9 games or less

 

[exploited17]

Uhh yea but that don’t have anything to do with the bengals .


And there have been plenty of teams who won super bowls who’s preseason win total was 9 games or less

Wasn't preseason, moron. Keep up with it.
Too dumb to comprehend my post
And it has plenty to dowith it. The thread is what history says about winning the SB

 

[Avocado33]

Wasn't preseason, moron. Keep up with it.
Too dumb to comprehend my post
And it has plenty to dowith it. The thread is what history says about winning the SB

Can't go by an over/under from a sports book though even if it's a few games into the season

Time has also proven Bengals undervalued by sportsbooks for like 1.5 years now....at a historical level

 

[exploited17]

Just trying to provide info as the season goes on I never guaranteed they would win 9 or less
Season progresses and we have potentially more things to rhink about

 

[Avocado33]

Just trying to provide info as the season goes on I never guaranteed they would win 9 or less
Season progresses and we have potentially more things to rhink about

I feel ya

Some trends are interesting for sure. There aren't enough data points though to make conclusions about this stuff though

I think the Bengals have outrun the Super Bowl hangover angle though, and I think most objective observers would say this Bengals team is better than last years.

Them making SB last year isn't going to factor in to their outcome this year