Be prepared for a nationwide mandatory quarantine of two weeks

Search

Member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
39,464
Tokens
Yes, they would. But they are not keeping present speed limits & sacrificing innocent children to car deaths there for the sake of the economy, as you falsely alleged. You provided no evidence that any government has ever done so or ever stated any such thing. In fact, BTW, many governments are taking multiple measures to reduce the number of deaths in car accidents.

You introduced car deaths with your analogy with the present COVID-19 crises, which you have long ago given up on arguing.

You also didn't explain the governments contradiction as per:

It's being alleged that governments are secretly conspiring to sacrifice lives to car accidents rather than lower the speed limit to 10 MPH in order to benefit the economy. Yet it is also being alleged these same governments are sacrificing the economy to save lives from dieing from COVID-19. So can't these governments make up their minds? Are they confused. Do they want to save lives or save the economy? Or is it that at least one or both of those allegations is wrong. Where is the evidence that governments have decided to sacrifice innocent children in car accidents in order to boost the economy? Where has any government ever stated anything like that?

If you can prevent traffic fatalities by lowering the speed limit, you would do it right? Makes sense right? We don’t lower speed limits because it’s a non-sensical approach to the problem. If we lowered the speed limits, large commercial deliveries would take 10x as long and that’s just one ramification. The impact of lowering the interstate speed limits to 10 MPH would be astronomical.

So, by not lowering the speed limits, our society and lawmakers are saying the risk is worth the reward. I can’t break it down anymore than that.
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2002
Messages
24,349
Tokens
If a state government wanted to lower the number of deaths on our nation's interstates, they would lower the speed limit.

They could try, just as they tried to shutdown the production & sale of alcohol at one point decades ago. Whether or not the people would accept a 10 MPH speed limit is unknown. BTW, other measures are being taken to save lives such as air bags, safer cars, police patrol, loss of licences, banning cars in cities, etc

You introduced car deaths with your analogy with the present COVID-19 crises, which you have long ago given up on arguing.

You also didn't explain the governments contradiction as per:

It's being alleged that governments are secretly conspiring to sacrifice lives to car accidents rather than lower the speed limit to 10 MPH in order to benefit the economy. Yet it is also being alleged these same governments are sacrificing the economy to save lives from dieing from COVID-19. So can't these governments make up their minds? Are they confused. Do they want to save lives or save the economy? Or is it that at least one or both of those allegations is wrong. Where is the evidence that governments have decided to sacrifice innocent children in car accidents in order to boost the economy? Where has any government ever stated anything like that?
 
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
28,144
Tokens
You’re literally just making stuff up with no clue this would happen.


It’s a fact. You do realize that your points are all being expressed on right wing news stations?

I just was watching Hitler and the nazis history documentary last night and I turn my tv on today and this guy is literally saying the exact same shit you guys are saying.


Reporting numbers and comparing it to the flu and saying we are shutting everything down and the numbers don’t add up.


So if he’s saying it...you’re saying it...Rednose the racist clown is saying it....faireycarrey is saying it....Harvey Updyke is saying it....Michael Miselis is saying it...

100 million percent chance y’all are wrong.

Meanwhile...I’m saying shit like the numbers are misrepresented there are about 10 unreported cases for every positive test. That’s a Harvard study. Not some far right extremist political whacko trying to hold trumps jock strap during this. Sorry.
 

Rx. Senior
Joined
Aug 21, 2002
Messages
8,370
Tokens
Obviously population density has a lot to do with it.

sEl3UjB.jpg
 

New member
Joined
Jan 18, 2005
Messages
6,890
Tokens
If we don’t close down the economy dumbfuck like you are suggesting we not do. If we don’t do that at all, millions will die

Millions will die in the United States...Seriously man???

You are basing this off of what?
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2002
Messages
24,349
Tokens
If you can prevent traffic fatalities by lowering the speed limit, you would do it right? Makes sense right? We don’t lower speed limits because it’s a non-sensical approach to the problem. If we lowered the speed limits, large commercial deliveries would take 10x as long and that’s just one ramification. The impact of lowering the interstate speed limits to 10 MPH would be astronomical.

So, by not lowering the speed limits, our society and lawmakers are saying the risk is worth the reward. I can’t break it down anymore than that.

Government could try to ban all kinds of things to save lives, but they don't, not for the sake of the economy, but because they've sworn an oath to the constitution to uphold individual liberties & the pursuit of happiness, even in cases where people prefer or enjoy higher risk activities or occupations. Occupations such as high rise window cleaning & construction, military service, law enforcement, professional athletes in contact sports, etc. Activities such as skydiving, bunging jumping, mountain & cliff climbing, alcohol use, etc.

As i've said before lowering the speed limit isn't going to stop deaths via people travelling. They'll still die due to travel methods even if cars were completely banned. They'd still die travelling by planes, bicycles, horse riding & walking. So where do you draw the line? How many deaths are acceptable? How low do you reduce the speed limit? And what about people's liberty & freedom in the pursuit of happiness? If people want to risk their lives in motor vehicles, that's their choice & on them. They don't have to. And the government isn't going to force it on them due to the oaths they've taken.

What government has ever stated they've decided to sacrifice lives on the highways so large commercial vehicles can move fast? How many road deaths are even due to such large commercial vehicle drivers?
 
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
28,144
Tokens
Millions will die in the United States...Seriously man???

You are basing this off of what?


Basing on if we go on about our normal lives and do absolutely nothing like you guys are suggesting. Yes. No question about it. Millions.
 

EV Whore
Joined
Apr 18, 2006
Messages
19,916
Tokens
I mean the current numbers don’t matter Enflameo that’s what makes you even more wrong here fuck head. For every one positive case there are at least another 5 walking around with it undetected. And at this point probably more like for every single positive test there are about 10 positive cases going unreported right now. Which really puts us over 3 million cases worldwide currently.
Which means the death rate is VASTLY overstated you fucking tard
 
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
28,144
Tokens
Which means the death rate is VASTLY overstated you fucking tard


face)(*^%


You really are confused about this still aren’t you wow. I thought you had more brains than Red eye. Guess not.


You need me to break shit down to you like I do with Enflameo? The problem with this virus is the contagious level factor. Testing is used as a prevention measure. Why? Because you are being accounted for. You can talk to everyone those people are in touch with. You can track it. That is why testing is and was so important. So if there is another 10 walking around unreported and 2 out of those 10 do not even know they have it. So that means it is spreading...undetected and untraceable. Not to mention who even knows if those other 8 are even self quarantining....most likely 3 or 4 of them aren’t.


I fucking TOLD YOU that YOU were just like ENFLAMEO. Fucking twins on this forum. Seriously, you guys would love each other in person I know it for a fact. Lmfaoooooo
 

New member
Joined
Jan 18, 2005
Messages
6,890
Tokens
Basing on if we go on about our normal lives and do absolutely nothing like you guys are suggesting. Yes. No question about it. Millions.

Stating something as a fact that is your opinion is not cool at all man.

It is your opinion 100% and only that, nothing more.

You are basing your opinion on what? You still did not explain what you are basing your millions will die opinion on.

It is disingenuous to even say that.

What does you guys suggesting, WTF are you talking about?
 
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
28,144
Tokens
Stating something as a fact that is your opinion is not cool at all man.

It is your opinion 100% and only that, nothing more.

You are basing your opinion on what? You still did not explain what you are basing your millions will die opinion on.

It is disingenuous to even say that.

What does you guys suggesting, WTF are you talking about?



On our current death rate and the amount of victims that were predicted to be sick from this.

Shutting the economy down is another prevention measure. It had to be done or we would no doubt reach those numbers. These are the type of measures that you take in order to save lives. That is why this is being done. I legit didn’t know if we would do this. That’s a shot at our culture and praise at the same time. Now we just need to abide to it.
 

New member
Joined
Jan 18, 2005
Messages
6,890
Tokens
face)(*^%


You really are confused about this still aren’t you wow. I thought you had more brains than Red eye. Guess not.


You need me to break shit down to you like I do with Enflameo? The problem with this virus is the contagious level factor. Testing is used as a prevention measure. Why? Because you are being accounted for. You can talk to everyone those people are in touch with. You can track it. That is why testing is and was so important. So if there is another 10 walking around unreported and 2 out of those 10 do not even know they have it. So that means it is spreading...undetected and untraceable. Not to mention who even knows if those other 8 are even self quarantining....most likely 3 or 4 of them aren’t.


I fucking TOLD YOU that YOU were just like ENFLAMEO. Fucking twins on this forum. Seriously, you guys would love each other in person I know it for a fact. Lmfaoooooo

Nothing you stated in this thread says or proves anything about you thinking so many will die?

Are you ever going to explain your stance or opinion on why you believe there will be millions of deaths?

There are many people who will go untested and have or had it. So it seems you are going by some death rate that is unproven and using it.
That rate is more than likely incorrect. As more tests are being given to people and more positives happen the official number of cases will rise.
It seems that the death rate will go down as more cases are confirmed.

Please explain why or how you think the rate will be high and what you think the death rate will be?
 

New member
Joined
Jan 18, 2005
Messages
6,890
Tokens
On our current death rate and the amount of victims that were predicted to be sick from this.

Shutting the economy down is another prevention measure. It had to be done or we would no doubt reach those numbers. These are the type of measures that you take in order to save lives. That is why this is being done. I legit didn’t know if we would do this. That’s a shot at our culture and praise at the same time.

Death rate is fluid and will not be accurate. You are basing your premise on numbers that are movable and more than likely incorrect....
You have nothing to go by for numbers as the numbers you are using are real time numbers and will always be changing

It is impossible to use those numbers and come up with anything accurate...
 

Member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
39,464
Tokens
They could try, just as they tried to shutdown the production & sale of alcohol at one point decades ago. Whether or not the people would accept a 10 MPH speed limit is unknown. BTW, other measures are being taken to save lives such as air bags, safer cars, police patrol, loss of licences, banning cars in cities, etc

You introduced car deaths with your analogy with the present COVID-19 crises, which you have long ago given up on arguing.

You also didn't explain the governments contradiction as per:

It's being alleged that governments are secretly conspiring to sacrifice lives to car accidents rather than lower the speed limit to 10 MPH in order to benefit the economy. Yet it is also being alleged these same governments are sacrificing the economy to save lives from dieing from COVID-19. So can't these governments make up their minds? Are they confused. Do they want to save lives or save the economy? Or is it that at least one or both of those allegations is wrong. Where is the evidence that governments have decided to sacrifice innocent children in car accidents in order to boost the economy? Where has any government ever stated anything like that?

I'm not sure why you keep saying this? The government isn't secretly doing anything in regards to sacrificing people dying in car accidents. WTF are you taking about and why do you keep saying this?

I'm saying by not lowering the speed limits so save people from dying on the interstates, local/state/federal authorities are telling you overtly lives lost in car accidents are acceptable in order to keep things flowing. No fucking politician is going to come out and say that but it's the clear message that is sent.

Same with alcohol deaths, suicides, window washing fatalities etc.
 

New member
Joined
Jan 18, 2005
Messages
6,890
Tokens
On our current death rate and the amount of victims that were predicted to be sick from this.

Shutting the economy down is another prevention measure. It had to be done or we would no doubt reach those numbers. These are the type of measures that you take in order to save lives. That is why this is being done. I legit didn’t know if we would do this. That’s a shot at our culture and praise at the same time. Now we just need to abide to it.

What are you using for a death rate? the world rate? The U.S. rate? ???
 

Member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
39,464
Tokens
Death rate is fluid and will not be accurate. You are basing your premise on numbers that are movable and more than likely incorrect....
You have nothing to go by for numbers as the numbers you are using are real time numbers and will always be changing

It is impossible to use those numbers and come up with anything accurate...

Dude, not worth it. He has no clue what the death total will be. Just making shit up.
 

New member
Joined
Jan 18, 2005
Messages
6,890
Tokens
On our current death rate and the amount of victims that were predicted to be sick from this.

Shutting the economy down is another prevention measure. It had to be done or we would no doubt reach those numbers. These are the type of measures that you take in order to save lives. That is why this is being done. I legit didn’t know if we would do this. That’s a shot at our culture and praise at the same time. Now we just need to abide to it.

Again you are basing actions on flawed numbers and logic.

You are talking like it is a fact and it is 100% not fact, it is 100% you opinion only.

So moving forward how about you talk like it is your opinion as that is what it is.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,116,247
Messages
13,531,218
Members
100,355
Latest member
skytechaviation71
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com