Be prepared for a nationwide mandatory quarantine of two weeks

Search

Active member
Joined
Nov 23, 2011
Messages
101,871
Tokens
Prob never have a correct number with many since Dec and even still now being treated as regular flu when not life threatening
 

Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2008
Messages
6,501
Tokens
I'm not sure why you keep saying this? The government isn't secretly doing anything in regards to sacrificing people dying in car accidents. WTF are you taking about and why do you keep saying this?

I'm saying by not lowering the speed limits so save people from dying on the interstates, local/state/federal authorities are telling you overtly lives lost in car accidents are acceptable in order to keep things flowing. No fucking politician is going to come out and say that but it's the clear message that is sent.

Your quote from 2 hours ago "Why do you keep talking to me about fucking interstate traffic? I don't give a shit."

If you don't give a shit, why do you keep responding Enforgetful?
 
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
28,144
Tokens
What are you using for a death rate? the world rate? The U.S. rate? ???


I’m talking about world wide as far as for every case there are 10 others undetected. As far as possible deaths reaching a million. That could’ve been the case here in America if we didn’t close anything. I estimated about 500,000 in the us, but I underestimated how contagious it is. If we didn’t shut anything down easily would’ve been a million dead here when all said and done.


If those most susceptible get it, the death rate will increase dramatically. We have like 10% of the population in the US as diagnosed diabetics. And how many more smoke? How many more do both? You have to realize if we do nothing the more likelihood that those people get it. And the more likelihood that those people will die. So I think the numbers are fucking your brain right now truthfully. Hit me up if you understand if you don’t, don’t bother.
 
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
28,144
Tokens
Death rate would’ve been about 3-4% death rate. You guys think the death rate is based on the virus only lmao I see where you are being confused I see now. Nah you have to base it on the type of person. That is what is dependent on the death rate. Think of it as if we did nothing....a lot more susceptible people would get sick and a lot more susceptible people would die which in result increase the death rate.


Do you understand yet? Gooooooood



Hercules Hercules Hercules!!!!!!!
 
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
28,144
Tokens
Lmfao Mob always wins vs stupid fucks.


Y’all can’t be poisoning trees and think you have more common sense than me. Fuck outta here
 

EV Whore
Joined
Apr 18, 2006
Messages
19,916
Tokens
I mean the current numbers don’t matter Enflameo that’s what makes you even more wrong here fuck head. For every one positive case there are at least another 5 walking around with it undetected. And at this point probably more like for every single positive test there are about 10 positive cases going unreported right now. Which really puts us over 3 million cases worldwide currently.

Which means the death rate is VASTLY overstated you fucking tard

face)(*^%


You really are confused about this still aren’t you wow. I thought you had more brains than Red eye. Guess not.


You need me to break shit down to you like I do with Enflameo? The problem with this virus is the contagious level factor. Testing is used as a prevention measure. Why? Because you are being accounted for. You can talk to everyone those people are in touch with. You can track it. That is why testing is and was so important. So if there is another 10 walking around unreported and 2 out of those 10 do not even know they have it. So that means it is spreading...undetected and untraceable. Not to mention who even knows if those other 8 are even self quarantining....most likely 3 or 4 of them aren’t.


I fucking TOLD YOU that YOU were just like ENFLAMEO. Fucking twins on this forum. Seriously, you guys would love each other in person I know it for a fact. Lmfaoooooo

You are fucking retarded.
You yourself said that infected rate is 5x or 10x what is being reported. Which means the actual death rate is MUCH LOWER than you keep citing when making your case about the "millions that could die".
Dumbass
 

Nirvana Shill
Joined
Oct 20, 2001
Messages
28,908
Tokens
I can see the fucking media creating a Fauci - Trump showdown...... when the shutdown ends and the economy begins to get back on line
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2002
Messages
24,349
Tokens
I'm not sure why you keep saying this? The government isn't secretly doing anything in regards to sacrificing people dying in car accidents. WTF are you taking about and why do you keep saying this?

I already addressed this the last time you asked it. See the answers in post #'s 134, 138 & 141.
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2002
Messages
24,349
Tokens
I'm saying by not lowering the speed limits so save people from dying on the interstates, local/state/federal authorities are telling you overtly lives lost in car accidents are acceptable in order to keep things flowing.

That's your assumption, pure speculation with absolutely nothing to back it. Far more reasonable & likely is what i've been telling you:

They could try, just as they tried to shutdown the production & sale of alcohol at one point decades ago. Whether or not the people would accept a 10 MPH speed limit is unknown. BTW, other measures are being taken to save lives such as air bags, safer cars, police patrol, loss of licences, banning cars in cities, etc

You introduced car deaths with your analogy with the present COVID-19 crises, which you have long ago given up on arguing.

You also didn't explain the governments contradiction as per:

It's being alleged that governments are secretly conspiring to sacrifice lives to car accidents rather than lower the speed limit to 10 MPH in order to benefit the economy. Yet it is also being alleged these same governments are sacrificing the economy to save lives from dieing from COVID-19. So can't these governments make up their minds? Are they confused. Do they want to save lives or save the economy? Or is it that at least one or both of those allegations is wrong. Where is the evidence that governments have decided to sacrifice innocent children in car accidents in order to boost the economy? Where has any government ever stated anything like that?

If you can prevent traffic fatalities by lowering the speed limit, you would do it right? Makes sense right? We don’t lower speed limits because it’s a non-sensical approach to the problem. If we lowered the speed limits, large commercial deliveries would take 10x as long and that’s just one ramification. The impact of lowering the interstate speed limits to 10 MPH would be astronomical.

So, by not lowering the speed limits, our society and lawmakers are saying the risk is worth the reward. I can’t break it down anymore than that.

Government could try to ban all kinds of things to save lives, but they don't, not for the sake of the economy, but because they've sworn an oath to the constitution to uphold individual liberties & the pursuit of happiness, even in cases where people prefer or enjoy higher risk activities or occupations. Occupations such as high rise window cleaning & construction, military service, law enforcement, professional athletes in contact sports, etc. Activities such as skydiving, bunging jumping, mountain & cliff climbing, alcohol use, etc.

As i've said before lowering the speed limit isn't going to stop deaths via people travelling. They'll still die due to travel methods even if cars were completely banned. They'd still die travelling by planes, bicycles, horse riding & walking. So where do you draw the line? How many deaths are acceptable? How low do you reduce the speed limit? And what about people's liberty & freedom in the pursuit of happiness? If people want to risk their lives in motor vehicles, that's their choice & on them. They don't have to. And the government isn't going to force it on them due to the oaths they've taken.

What government has ever stated they've decided to sacrifice lives on the highways so large commercial vehicles can move fast? How many road deaths are even due to such large commercial vehicle drivers?
 

Member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
39,464
Tokens
That's your assumption, pure speculation with absolutely nothing to back it. Far more reasonable & likely is what i've been telling you:

They could try, just as they tried to shutdown the production & sale of alcohol at one point decades ago. Whether or not the people would accept a 10 MPH speed limit is unknown. BTW, other measures are being taken to save lives such as air bags, safer cars, police patrol, loss of licences, banning cars in cities, etc

You introduced car deaths with your analogy with the present COVID-19 crises, which you have long ago given up on arguing.

You also didn't explain the governments contradiction as per:

It's being alleged that governments are secretly conspiring to sacrifice lives to car accidents rather than lower the speed limit to 10 MPH in order to benefit the economy. Yet it is also being alleged these same governments are sacrificing the economy to save lives from dieing from COVID-19. So can't these governments make up their minds? Are they confused. Do they want to save lives or save the economy? Or is it that at least one or both of those allegations is wrong. Where is the evidence that governments have decided to sacrifice innocent children in car accidents in order to boost the economy? Where has any government ever stated anything like that?



Government could try to ban all kinds of things to save lives, but they don't, not for the sake of the economy, but because they've sworn an oath to the constitution to uphold individual liberties & the pursuit of happiness, even in cases where people prefer or enjoy higher risk activities or occupations. Occupations such as high rise window cleaning & construction, military service, law enforcement, professional athletes in contact sports, etc. Activities such as skydiving, bunging jumping, mountain & cliff climbing, alcohol use, etc.

As i've said before lowering the speed limit isn't going to stop deaths via people travelling. They'll still die due to travel methods even if cars were completely banned. They'd still die travelling by planes, bicycles, horse riding & walking. So where do you draw the line? How many deaths are acceptable? How low do you reduce the speed limit? And what about people's liberty & freedom in the pursuit of happiness? If people want to risk their lives in motor vehicles, that's their choice & on them. They don't have to. And the government isn't going to force it on them due to the oaths they've taken.

What government has ever stated they've decided to sacrifice lives on the highways so large commercial vehicles can move fast? How many road deaths are even due to such large commercial vehicle drivers?

To spend this much time on this very simple concept is mind boggling. You're a very strange individual.
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2002
Messages
24,349
Tokens
To spend this much time on this very simple concept is mind boggling. You're a very strange individual.

Why is it mind boggling? Obviously i don't think the matter is as simplistic as you do. Hence it required more time to consider than something with as simple an explanation as yours.
 

Member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
39,464
Tokens
Why is it mind boggling? Obviously i don't think the matter is as simplistic as you do. Hence it required more time to consider than something with as simple an explanation as yours.

I don't care what you think. What else do you need from me?
 
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
28,144
Tokens
You are fucking retarded.
You yourself said that infected rate is 5x or 10x what is being reported. Which means the actual death rate is MUCH LOWER than you keep citing when making your case about the "millions that could die".
Dumbass


You still don’t understand LOL holy shit. You’re just a stubborn fuck. You need to read and read carefully. I can’t answer that without explaining this virus.



And yes millions could die IF we didn’t take any precautions like you and your dumbass friends all think we shouldn’t have done. If trump lets this up by Easter it will only get worse. Theres an incompetent president in office so who knows
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,116,247
Messages
13,531,218
Members
100,355
Latest member
skytechaviation71
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com