I'm not sure why you keep saying this? The government isn't secretly doing anything in regards to sacrificing people dying in car accidents. WTF are you taking about and why do you keep saying this?
I'm saying by not lowering the speed limits so save people from dying on the interstates, local/state/federal authorities are telling you overtly lives lost in car accidents are acceptable in order to keep things flowing. No fucking politician is going to come out and say that but it's the clear message that is sent.
What are you using for a death rate? the world rate? The U.S. rate? ???
I mean the current numbers don’t matter Enflameo that’s what makes you even more wrong here fuck head. For every one positive case there are at least another 5 walking around with it undetected. And at this point probably more like for every single positive test there are about 10 positive cases going unreported right now. Which really puts us over 3 million cases worldwide currently.
Which means the death rate is VASTLY overstated you fucking tard
face)(*^%
You really are confused about this still aren’t you wow. I thought you had more brains than Red eye. Guess not.
You need me to break shit down to you like I do with Enflameo? The problem with this virus is the contagious level factor. Testing is used as a prevention measure. Why? Because you are being accounted for. You can talk to everyone those people are in touch with. You can track it. That is why testing is and was so important. So if there is another 10 walking around unreported and 2 out of those 10 do not even know they have it. So that means it is spreading...undetected and untraceable. Not to mention who even knows if those other 8 are even self quarantining....most likely 3 or 4 of them aren’t.
I fucking TOLD YOU that YOU were just like ENFLAMEO. Fucking twins on this forum. Seriously, you guys would love each other in person I know it for a fact. Lmfaoooooo
I'm saying by not lowering the speed limits so save people from dying on the interstates, local/state/federal authorities are telling you overtly lives lost in car accidents are acceptable in order to keep things flowing.
If you can prevent traffic fatalities by lowering the speed limit, you would do it right? Makes sense right? We don’t lower speed limits because it’s a non-sensical approach to the problem. If we lowered the speed limits, large commercial deliveries would take 10x as long and that’s just one ramification. The impact of lowering the interstate speed limits to 10 MPH would be astronomical.
So, by not lowering the speed limits, our society and lawmakers are saying the risk is worth the reward. I can’t break it down anymore than that.
That's your assumption, pure speculation with absolutely nothing to back it. Far more reasonable & likely is what i've been telling you:
They could try, just as they tried to shutdown the production & sale of alcohol at one point decades ago. Whether or not the people would accept a 10 MPH speed limit is unknown. BTW, other measures are being taken to save lives such as air bags, safer cars, police patrol, loss of licences, banning cars in cities, etc
You introduced car deaths with your analogy with the present COVID-19 crises, which you have long ago given up on arguing.
You also didn't explain the governments contradiction as per:
It's being alleged that governments are secretly conspiring to sacrifice lives to car accidents rather than lower the speed limit to 10 MPH in order to benefit the economy. Yet it is also being alleged these same governments are sacrificing the economy to save lives from dieing from COVID-19. So can't these governments make up their minds? Are they confused. Do they want to save lives or save the economy? Or is it that at least one or both of those allegations is wrong. Where is the evidence that governments have decided to sacrifice innocent children in car accidents in order to boost the economy? Where has any government ever stated anything like that?
Government could try to ban all kinds of things to save lives, but they don't, not for the sake of the economy, but because they've sworn an oath to the constitution to uphold individual liberties & the pursuit of happiness, even in cases where people prefer or enjoy higher risk activities or occupations. Occupations such as high rise window cleaning & construction, military service, law enforcement, professional athletes in contact sports, etc. Activities such as skydiving, bunging jumping, mountain & cliff climbing, alcohol use, etc.
As i've said before lowering the speed limit isn't going to stop deaths via people travelling. They'll still die due to travel methods even if cars were completely banned. They'd still die travelling by planes, bicycles, horse riding & walking. So where do you draw the line? How many deaths are acceptable? How low do you reduce the speed limit? And what about people's liberty & freedom in the pursuit of happiness? If people want to risk their lives in motor vehicles, that's their choice & on them. They don't have to. And the government isn't going to force it on them due to the oaths they've taken.
What government has ever stated they've decided to sacrifice lives on the highways so large commercial vehicles can move fast? How many road deaths are even due to such large commercial vehicle drivers?
You are fucking retarded.
You yourself said that infected rate is 5x or 10x what is being reported. Which means the actual death rate is MUCH LOWER than you keep citing when making your case about the "millions that could die".
Dumbass