Of course the only difference between "my" strategy and what's actually happened would be about 5000 less of these
But, for those who celebrate these deaths (aka - OBL and AQ), it's a booming business.
I'm sure that OBL and AQ are also glad that Barman was not POTUS in Sept 2001.
Before that date, they had to plan for over a decade to figure out how to kill a couple thousand Americans.
Since that date, the U.S. government sends them fresh bodies in a nice steady flow. And we as taxpayers even pay the freight!
Pretty good deal for those who like to kill Americans
But, for those who celebrate these deaths (aka - OBL and AQ), it's a booming business.
I'm sure that OBL and AQ are also glad that Barman was not POTUS in Sept 2001.
Before that date, they had to plan for over a decade to figure out how to kill a couple thousand Americans.
Since that date, the U.S. government sends them fresh bodies in a nice steady flow. And we as taxpayers even pay the freight!
Pretty good deal for those who like to kill Americans
Wait! I just spent a few minutes staring at these counters
http://costofwar.com/
And now I feel so much safer about leaving the house tomorrow.
:grandmais
http://costofwar.com/
And now I feel so much safer about leaving the house tomorrow.
:grandmais
Of course the only difference between "my" strategy and what's actually happened would be about 5000 less of these
But, for those who celebrate these deaths (aka - OBL and AQ), it's a booming business.
I'm sure that OBL and AQ are also glad that Barman was not POTUS in Sept 2001.
Before that date, they had to plan for over a decade to figure out how to kill a couple thousand Americans.
Since that date, the U.S. government sends them fresh bodies in a nice steady flow. And we as taxpayers even pay the freight!
Pretty good deal for those who like to kill Americans
If we do what you say we should be doing (capture OBL) then you're going to have casulties. You can't have it both ways.
Actually, if I have my way as soon as I'd like, it will be Senora NES making me some Costa Rican meatloaf and I will be eating it up and then burning a nice phat bowl with NES before heading down to the TimeOutTavern or that Pirate Club.
And she will probably tell us what time to be home, thus making us both HER bitches.
And she will probably tell us what time to be home, thus making us both HER bitches.
Under my system, we would not have needed to feed almost 5000+ of my U.S. brothers and sisters to the OBL meat grinder.
And since this Thread was graced with MY name, I can have it pretty much both ways or any way I want.
Suggest you start a new Thread titled, "What Sgt Enfuego Would Do Differently" and then make a single Reply of "Nothing. Because I love feeding Americans to the Mideast Meat Grinder."
I don't think anybody besides AQ terrorists and their ideological cheerleaders, whether they support or disagree with Operation Enduring Freedom, enjoy seeing a big pile of dead US soldiers. And that includes the current and former presidents.
Would anyone on this forum disagree that both Bush and Obama are privy to way more information than the rest of us?
Does anyone on this forum believe that both of these men would feed our soldiers into an al Queda meatgrinder [sic] for no good reason?
Or is it more plausible that knowing this information both these men, who have vast political differences, believe there is a very good reason to put our American Heroes in harm's way? That it is a necessary risk not taken lightly.
Because if you believe, Barman, that both of our presidents made this choice for the reasons you state, you might as well carry it further and say that manKIND is basically evil. Because were you to be right we would have to be [evil].
Would anyone on this forum disagree that both Bush and Obama are privy to way more information than the rest of us?
Does anyone on this forum believe that both of these men would feed our soldiers into an al Queda meatgrinder [sic] for no good reason?
Or is it more plausible that knowing this information both these men, who have vast political differences, believe there is a very good reason to put our American Heroes in harm's way? That it is a necessary risk not taken lightly.
Because if you believe, Barman, that both of our presidents made this choice for the reasons you state, you might as well carry it further and say that manKIND is basically evil. Because were you to be right we would have to be [evil].
