Close? How close? You keep babbling this crap and refuse to address my post from yesterday. You are man of great information but I've seen nothing yet that shows exactly what happened here except that these soldiers made a mistake drifting into enemy waters and the enemy captured them in what seemed to be a peaceful capture. If they resisted there is a good chance they would have been killed. Show some proof to back what you say.
These were not civilians in a speed boat on a pleasure boat.
There were 2 boats, state of the art boats, heavily armed with mounted machine guns and cannon, very capable boats, easily capable of keeping the inferior Iranian speed boats at a distance. The USS Harry S. Truman carrier strike group was nearby. Assets were there, but like Bengahzi they were not used.
There was sufficient capabilities to prevent arrest by Iran.
It was a humiliation.
If it had been Israeli boats, they would not have capitulated. That is the difference.
I doubt whether Russian or Chinese assets in the same situation would of capitulated.
There was no resistance, no attempt to resist and that is very concerning. It sends the wrong message.
ASSETS WERE AVAILABLE
The Navy realized the boats were missing when they failed to appear shipside in the Gulf for refueling on their way to Bahrain, one defense official said. GPS devices aboard the boats enabled the Navy to determine, after the fact, that they were in Iranian waters, but the Navy was not immediately sure whether the crew members were safe or had gone overboard.
So a search-and-rescue operation was undertaken, and at least one U.S. ship crossed into Iranian waters to look for the crew after alerting the Iranian navy of their intentions.
The Iranians did not interfere, the defense official said. The official was not authorized to discuss these details and spoke on condition of anonymity.