Anti Immigration & Illegal Immigration Info - Ongoing Thread

Search
Joined
Oct 30, 2006
Messages
39,835
Tokens
A lot of donations to numbersusa from AZ Isnt that where McCain is from

map_2007-12-31-23.png
 
Joined
Oct 30, 2006
Messages
39,835
Tokens
<TABLE class=media-innerbuffer cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=markerTEXTblueMAJOR colSpan=3>Illegal Immigration Documentary is Eye-Opening </TD></TR><TR><TD class=discussionTEXTred colSpan=3>Human Events : January 23 , 2008 -- by Ned Rice </TD></TR><TR><TD colSpan=3></TD></TR><TR><TD class=markerTEXTblueMINOR vAlign=top height="100%">"We meet American ranchers whose property has been destroyed by migrants, doctors whose border-town hospitals are overrun by the undocumented indigent, and native-born American workers whose livelihoods have been lost to illegal immigrant labor ... But the most compelling, real-life characters in Border are the Americans of various ages, ethnicities and backgrounds who came from all over the U.S. to volunteer their services in defense of our borders." </TD><TD width="2%"></TD><TD vAlign=top><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=discussionTEXT colSpan=2>What's the one-word theme of the 2008 presidential primaries? According to the media it's "change." Hillary Clinton recently claimed that she's been an agent of change for the past 35 years, which struck some of us as being even more contradictory than her position on Iraq. But the real key to this year's presidential race may prove to be immigration. According to a recent New York Times/CBS News poll, illegal immigration ranks just behind the Iraq War as the most important problem facing the U.S. Three out of four Republican voters describe illegal immigration as a "very serious" problem, according to another Times/CBS poll. Meanwhile, 27% of independent voters say that a candidates' position on illegal immigration could be a deal-breaker for them. Maybe that's why Huckabee, Romney, and Giuliani are hardening their positions on illegal immigration just as fast as their little flip-floppers will flip-flop them -- I mean, which is why the top-tier Republican candidates have been so busy refining and clarifying their evolving positions on illegal immigration as of late.

</TD></TR><TR><TD colSpan=2></TD></TR><TR><TD class=discussionTEXT colSpan=2>As luck would have it, a new documentary on illegal immigration has just been released. It's required viewing for anyone who seeks a fuller understanding of this complicated issue. The film, "Border", is the work of director Chris Burgard, an independent filmmaker (please don't call him an "indie") whose journey from Wisconsin to Hollywood by way of the rodeo circuit is a tale unto itself. </TD></TR><TR><TD colSpan=2></TD></TR><TR><TD class=discussionTEXT colSpan=2>The genesis of this film dates back to 2005 when activist Chris Simcox founded the Minute Men Civil Defense Corps. After Simcox's group announced plans to spend October of 2005 monitoring and reporting illegal border crossings along the U.S./Mexican border, Burgard paid them a visit, and before long, he decided to document their efforts on film. </TD></TR><TR><TD colSpan=2></TD></TR><TR><TD class=discussionTEXT colSpan=2>"Border" is set in the parts of Arizona, New Mexico, Texas and California where most of the illegal crossings take place. Here we meet illegal immigrants who, despite their lawlessness, are clearly more victims than villains of the status quo. We meet American ranchers whose property has been destroyed by migrants, doctors whose border-town hospitals are overrun by the undocumented indigent, and native-born American workers whose livelihoods have been lost to illegal immigrant labor. We also encounter the obligatory ACLU spokesman who predictably claims that the real problem here is American racism. But the most compelling, real-life characters in Border are the Americans of various ages, ethnicities and backgrounds who came from all over the U.S. to volunteer their services in defense of our borders. Armed mostly with lawn chairs, binoculars and walkie-talkies, these brave men (and women) become the eyes and ears of our undermanned Border Patrol, not to mention an embarrassment to the agencies and officials whose jobs they're doing. </TD></TR><TR><TD colSpan=2></TD></TR><TR><TD class=discussionTEXT colSpan=2>Despite its serious subject matter, "Border" is a briskly paced, highly entertaining feature with moments of genuine humor and pathos, not to mention excellent production values. Indeed, some of the sequences -- like the after-dark thermal footage of armed coyotes passing mere yards from Burgard's hidden camera -- would not seem out of place in a big-budget Hollywood thriller. Burgard's unaffected charm and sly wit permeate the film through his occasional narration and on-camera appearances. But unlike the works of some other documentarians we could mention, Burgard's movie is never about him. Instead, Burgard lets the film's powerful visuals, and the people he meets, tell the story. Moreover, Burgard's use of animation to graphically depict dynamic situations and statistical graphics that put the film's visual content into context are both first-rate. While its overall message is alarming, I'm happy to report that Border ends on an optimistic note, even offering suggestions as to how this multi-faceted problem might be addressed. Whether you agree with these ideas or not, you really can't see this film without acquiring a deeper understanding of America's illegal immigration problem and a renewed determination to do something about it. On that basis alone, I strongly urge every American who cares about the future of this country to see "Border" whether you happen to be running for President at the moment or not. </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
"Border" is set in the parts of Arizona, New Mexico, Texas and California where most of the illegal crossings take place. Here we meet illegal immigrants who, despite their lawlessness, are clearly more victims than villains of the status quo. We meet American ranchers whose property has been destroyed by migrants, doctors whose border-town hospitals are overrun by the undocumented indigent, and native-born American workers whose livelihoods have been lost to illegal immigrant labor. We also encounter the obligatory ACLU spokesman who predictably claims that the real problem here is American racism. But the most compelling, real-life characters in Border are the Americans of various ages, ethnicities and backgrounds who came from all over the U.S. to volunteer their services in defense of our borders. Armed mostly with lawn chairs, binoculars and walkie-talkies, these brave men (and women) become the eyes and ears of our undermanned Border Patrol, not to mention an embarrassment to the agencies and officials whose jobs they’re doing.

Despite its serious subject matter, "Border" is a briskly paced, highly entertaining feature with moments of genuine humor and pathos, not to mention excellent production values. Indeed, some of the sequences -- like the after-dark thermal footage of armed coyotes passing mere yards from Burgard’s hidden camera -- would not seem out of place in a big-budget Hollywood thriller. Burgard’s unaffected charm and sly wit permeate the film through his occasional narration and on-camera appearances. But unlike the works of some other documentarians we could mention, Burgard’s movie is never about him. Instead, Burgard lets the film’s powerful visuals, and the people he meets, tell the story. Moreover, Burgard’s use of animation to graphically depict dynamic situations and statistical graphics that put the film’s visual content into context are both first-rate. While its overall message is alarming, I’m happy to report that Border ends on an optimistic note, even offering suggestions as to how this multi-faceted problem might be addressed. Whether you agree with these ideas or not, you really can’t see this film without acquiring a deeper understanding of America’s illegal immigration problem and a renewed determination to do something about it. On that basis alone, I strongly urge every American who cares about the future of this country to see "Border" whether you happen to be running for President at the moment or not.

<HR>Mr. Rice is believed to be the only person in Hollywood to have both written for "Real Time with Bill Maher" and voted Republican. His other staff writing credits include "The Tonight Show with Jay Leno," "Politically Incorrect," and many other fine television programs. He can be reached at egrice@ca.rr.com.
<HR>
Reader Comments: ( 33
)
Here are the comments submitted by Human Events readers:


Page 1 What a great article! I will definately see the film.

It is nice for once to see a journalist treat the whole illegal immigration issue as a real problem, not just a mole hill created by racist, nativist, xenophobic people who just don't understand why amnesty is just what business needs.
Bettybb, San Jose, CA
Jan 23, 2008 @ 05:40 AM


Sen. McCain Champions Illegal Aliens
mlimberg, USA
Jan 23, 2008 @ 08:31 AM


I'm willing to bet Sen. McCain would be revealed as one of those coyotes helping illegals across our alleged southern border.
Jamal Taylor, Tampa, FL
Jan 23, 2008 @ 08:49 AM


Learn more here: http://www.bordermovie.com/

Related: http://www.borderwarmovie.com/




tiredofit, Texas
Jan 23, 2008 @ 08:50 AM


It is a shame that people like Betty from San Jose use the typical lingo against those that are concerned about illegal aliens and the severe problems they have on the economy and our country. Why is an American branded as nativist or xenophobe if he or she opposes illegal immigration? So, what Betty is really trying to convey is: the law should apply for Americans but not illegal aliens because they (illegals) are just trying to work? Clearly, that argument is worthless as Clinton's land scheme. Amenesty is not an option, it did not work for Reagan and why would one think that it will work now against 12 - 20 million? If Eisenhower had the courage to deport over 1 million why should it not be done now. That would send a very clear message to the illegals and the foreign governments that undermine American policy.
Adam Bennett, Jacksonville, FL
Jan 23, 2008 @ 10:15 AM


Just a few months ago I saw this film at a special showing in Charlotte, NC sponsored by ALIPAC (Americans for Legal Immigration Political Action Committee). I was blown away by the scenes and events shown. This is a tremendously important film that the mainstream media will never address, support or encourage you to see. I also had the opportunity to spend time with the film maker, Chris Burgard and William Gheen, ALIPAC president afterwards in a discussion. These two gentlemen are trying to get the truth and facts out to the American public as to the effect of illegal immigration on our country. What an eye opening experience. I was so impressed with this film that I bought copies for Christmas presents to give each of my family members who are scattered across the country. I wanted them to know what is really going on at the Mexican border.

I highly recommend you see this film.
zeezil, North Carolina
Jan 23, 2008 @ 10:15 AM


While I'm sure showing the actual border does go to show some of the problems faced there, do they go into depth as to why there was a giant influx of Immigrants, starting in 1993? The reason people are coming in droves, and leaving their families behind(think about what it would take for a head of household to do that for your family), is that the Mexican Economy collapsed after Clinton rammed NAFTA. The North American Free Trade deal, and keep in mind, the Free is just "Sloganeering", has hurt a great number of people south of the border. As work dried up due to increased corporate Globalization, many people were forced from their land, and have come here in sheer desperation.
The agriculture provisions of NAFTA meant that many Mexican farmers had to compete with the more highly productive, highly mechanized, and highly subsidized farms of North America. Almost immediately, imports of Mexican staples like corn, beans, and barley flooded into the country at prices few Mexican farmers could compete with. Since NAFTA was implemented, the price of corn dropped nearly 50 percent while the price of tortillas-a staple of the daily Mexican diet- increased 50 percent. Another particularly illuminating statistic shows that 1.3 million farmers have abandoned their plots as a direct result of NAFTA -driven imports.
We, in effect, forced this migration by entering into unequal trade relations with poor countries. Under the successive Bush administration, these Free- Trade policies have been the centerpiece of economic policy. The rhetoric of leaders pushing the trade agreements always aims to convince constituents of affected countries and the American people that the treaties will be of benefit to all involved. Nothing could be further from the truth, although you won't hear that on CNN and certainly not Fox News. Keep in mind they are making big advertising dollars from the pillaging of the third world, and it would be bad for business to do something as silly as tell you all the truth. This pattern has been repeated in every corner of the globe, all with the same results.
Do they show you should show the huge jails run by private firms, subcontracted by the Department of Homeland Security? The people who get these huge contracts are politically connected to those in power. This should scare people more that a Mexican here to cut you grass or bus your table after a meal.
The corporate leaders would like you to believe they are here to invade your country and suck your wealth, because it divides and conquers. What we need to do is ask our government why we are not playing fair, you know, like we teach our kids on the playground. If we played fair from the start, the Trade Centers would still be standing. Can you read above and now understand why the Trade Center Towers were the primary target of a small group of disgruntled people? Do you think the more people we impoverish and victimize on the planet is making us safer as a nation?
If it answers any of these questions I’m all for seeing it. The problem with news these days is it always seems to leave out the why…



Cloud, CT
Jan 23, 2008 @ 10:20 AM


What kind of country are we leaving to our children?

Please join the fight to save it!!

NUMBERSUSA.COM
BETTERIMMIGRATION.COM
INFIDEL, las vegas
Jan 23, 2008 @ 10:21 AM


This film is powerful...and shows the ugly truth about what's going on right now, every day and every night at our Southern Border. Chertoff has stated in the press yesterday that violence on the part of illegal alien and drug cartel smugglers is getting even worse ....so why isn't the U.S. sending the military to secure our border until we can finish the fence and hire/train and deploy more Border Patrol agents? This is utter insanity, people! No country would tolerate this much violence and mayhem and allow armed foreign national criminals to wreak havoc at our border and beyond. Send the military, secure the border, build the fence....ya es hora!
legalatina, pennsylvania - sanctuary state
Jan 23, 2008 @ 11:55 AM


If we all paused and thought about it, the problem is.. Mexico's. OUR problem are the idiots who want to take care of the poor illegal aliens with taxpayer dollars. At this point, the taxpayers have forked over billions to the illegal aliens, and mostly against our will. The key to the sucessful stick up was the screams of racism when we refused. The key to the sucessful stick up was the Democratic Party telling us amnesty was the only way.

You know.. I don't think we are out of the woods at all either. There are a huge number of voting illegal aliens out there, and they do want their way.
Joel E. , Prescott, AZ
Jan 23, 2008 @ 11:59 AM


It's time to make Mexico take responsiblity for its people. Calderon is coming to the U.S. as part of Mexico's 100 million dollar public relations campaign to demand that the U.S. grant amnesty and a path to citizenship to all Mexican illegal aliens currently illegally residing in our country. THe Feb. trip is timed to coincide with the primaries. How nice....another Mexican President directly trying to influence and meddle in our political and governmental affairs. Calderon's visits to NYC, Boston, L.A. and Chicago,.....some of the largest illegal alien sanctuary cities in our nation. Calderon and the Mexican government should, instead, be spending that 100 million dollars on providing economic opportunities, jobs, education and health care for their underclass and offering that as an incentive to get the ilelgal aliens here to self-repatriate before they are deported. Now, that would be the most humane, compassionate thing to do! Si se puede!
legalatina, pennsylvania - sanctuary state
Jan 23, 2008 @ 12:04 PM


"Border" is an excellently done documentary film; I purchased my own copy upon viewing it. Bottom line is that the border is open and people are crossing it to come here. Where people are forced to congregate crime will happen. Just like in any herd behavior, the craftier people prey on the weak. What is stunning is the lack of resolve on the part of the US government to enforce the border. Border patrol agents just seem to be pawns and targets to be shot at by the wily coyotes. The Mexicans just keep coming, no matter how tall and solid the fences, no matter how hostile and deadly the terrain, no matter how many times they are caught and repatriated, the Mexicans just keep coming. The answer is not to be solved merely by fencing. The magnet that attracts these illegal aliens to go through great lengths to get here - meaning, paying jobs, free social programs, sanctuary from detection, entitlements, and politicians pandering to the illegal alien vote to name a few, must be stopped immediately. Severe penalties must also be dealt those who break the law by smuggling illegal aliens, hiring them, and/or supporting their existence in this country. Anything short of these solutions will not work.
Tagudinian, Florida
Jan 23, 2008 @ 12:09 PM


Border Movie
Jeff, Houston, TX
Jan 23, 2008 @ 12:53 PM


In a free society no one has a claim to a job because that would imply the business owner is not free. The idea that illegal immagrants "take" someone elses job is to not recognise civil rights, the freedom, of businessmen.
Bill, St. Petersburg FL
Jan 23, 2008 @ 01:05 PM


It doesn't matter whether Mccain wants amnesty. It's not going to happen, it's too late states have taken up the issue at the request of their citizens and no matter who gets in next time they would be able to follow through with their promises. The time for amnesty is gone. The time for states to start sueing their federal government for stepping up and doing their job, they will need reimbursement for state funds spent. Once we start taking money out of the pockets of politicians, they will wake up. Big thumbs up to Michigan. Follow through Nebraska, pass your laws that you citizens demand.
howard, cincinnati
Jan 23, 2008 @ 02:05 PM


Now that Tancredo and Hunter are out of the race, Paul is the only one left who were against illegal immigration from the beginning. The rest are just full of hot air.

I'll be sure to check this movie out. Thanks Ned.
John Bailey, Montgomery, AL
Jan 23, 2008 @ 02:11 PM


Illegal Aliens and Immigration is NOT the same thing. Immigrant is a legal status granted by a sovereign country. We have to many folks who do not know and are ignorant or outright deceivers, confusing illegal alien workers calling them illegal immigrants with immigrants. Criminals did NOT build America; Citizens and LEGAL immigrants built it. 80% of the American people want an end to anarchy! This is NOT a Democrat, Republican, Independent issue. It's an American Issue.

Illegal aliens are criminals, those who hire them are criminals and those who aid-and-abet them are criminals.

Illegal aliens in America have NO rights. We are required by law to arrest and prosecute, deport them. (Title 8 U.S. Code) To report illegal aliens call the DHS National Hotline 1 866 DHS 2ICE. (1-866-347-2523)

No, matter your political party affiliation, and setting aside your thoughts on issues. We all need to remember what it is to be an American Citizen. We need to make sure our elected representatives obey their Oath of Office and keep their Oath of Allegiance. See http://tinyurl.com/2znnvl Know whom you are voting for.

Dr Coles, Los Angeles
Jan 23, 2008 @ 02:16 PM


Cloud writes: "The reason people are coming in droves ... is that the Mexican Economy collapsed after Clinton rammed NAFTA"

No wonder Ronald Reagan chose to offer amnesty to all the illegal immigrants...because of Clinton's NAFTA program! Oh, wait...that was 8 years before Clinton authorized NAFTA.

Here's a graph of historical Mexican GDP per capita. Maybe you can point out this "economic collapse" you talk about....

http://www.swivel.com/graphs/show/13346900

Tell the clowns at Union HQ that your spam ain't working.

Bill writes: "The idea that illegal immagrants "take" someone elses job is to not recognise civil rights, the freedom, of businessmen."

No, that's a straw man. The employers freely hire illegal immigrants when they would otherwise have to hire American citizens or legal immigrants. They exercise their "right" to hire whomever they want.

Permitting a large pool of cheap, but illegal, labor distorts the true market value of domestic labor in the affected industries.

This results in employees, who would otherwise take the jobs at true market wage, losing their jobs to illegals who work at less than the true market wage.

Effectively, they lose their jobs to illegals. That's the crux of the economic problem, in fact.
Carl Branstetter, Largo, FL
Jan 23, 2008 @ 02:19 PM


A few years ago the people of the state of CA voted and passed a law saying they would no longer pay for the social services of people who are here illegally.

However, since we are no longer governed by our governer and elected state representatives of our respective states, a federal judge simply struck down the law in question.

Evidently, the powers of DC have decided they are not going to secure the borders of the US and they are going to ENSLAVE the citizens of the US to illegal aliens.

Most of us work. We are just going to have to work a little more to support our new dependents.
TxConfederate, TX
Jan 23, 2008 @ 03:01 PM


Adam Bennett, Jacksonville, FL-
I have no idea why or how you could possible mis-read Betty's comments as being pro-amnesty or condone illegal immigration!
Please re-reread and think again.

BettyBB should be commended for all the work she has done to bring this important issue to light. If you google her username I'm sure you will no doubt see her stand on the issue.
DinTN, Tennessee
Jan 23, 2008 @ 03:09 PM
 
Joined
Oct 30, 2006
Messages
39,835
Tokens
Fuck McVain

Ann Coulter: I will campaign for Hillary if it's McCain (Time for a rant!)
<HR style="COLOR: #fdde82" SIZE=1><!-- / icon and title --><!-- message -->Everywhere I go, it's insanity. Traditional Republicans who say they will vote for a Dim -- Life long Dims who say they will vote GOP.

What's going on? Very simple. The biggest story of this campaign so far is...

THE DEARTH OF LEADERSHIP

I'll say this much. This country (the greatest in the history of man) was not built on whining, moonbat conspiracy crap courtesy of the X-box/PS3 generation with way too much time on their hands, manic depressives, Adam and Steve activists, Chicken Littles, BDS "Bush lied; kids died" partisan hacks who can't be reasoned with, and "constitutional" and "hope" charlatans traversing the country courting the gullible "youth vote" and any other lost demented soul who's never set foot in a library.

We survived Jane Fonda's "anti-war" leftist "youth movement" in the 60s. We survived C-A-R-T-E-R! We survived Bill Clinton's holiday from history.

We will survive again.

Why?

Because Americans are optimists. Americans are doers. Americans know the meaning of an honest day's hard work and the meaning of sacrifice (unlike those pompous Euroweenies who never earned their own freedom, are being invaded by Muslims and going down the tubes). Above all, Americans know HONEST LEADERSHIP and wisdom when they see it -- and NONE of the whores left standing in BOTH parties have it. None -- including Dr. Kook.

Ron Paul couldn't manage a fucking fruit stand...he's a talker, a theorist, a paper pusher, a fraud...a CAREER politician (not a CITIZEN politician) who cares only about his OWN interests and wouldn't know spirit of this country of the framers rose from the dead. Anyone who knows how Washington works can see Ron Paul is no different than those he vilifies. Yes, my fellow kooks, the TRUTH hurts.

Now get a load of this...

<EMBED src=""http://www.dailymotion.com/swf/x48ewt width=420 height=339 type=application/x-shockwave-flash allowFullScreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always"></EMBED>
Coulter
by krs601


This country doesn't need a "professional campaigner" -- that process has FAILED the PEOPLE -- this country needs a LEADER with the wisdom of Solomon, who can INSPIRE a nation...

Ladies and gentlemen, the next President of the United States: http://mittromney.com

President Brokered Convention!
 

New member
Joined
Oct 20, 2005
Messages
9,282
Tokens
Wow, you come up with all those big words on your own?? :missingte :lolBIG:
 
Joined
Oct 30, 2006
Messages
39,835
Tokens
<TABLE class=media-innerbuffer cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=markerTEXTblueMAJOR colSpan=3>Tancredo Assails Stimulus Package "Giveaway" to Illegal Aliens </TD></TR><TR><TD class=discussionTEXTred colSpan=3>Rep. Tom Tancredo (R-Colo.) : January 30 , 2008 -- by T.Q. Houlton </TD></TR><TR><TD colSpan=3> </TD></TR><TR><TD class=markerTEXTblueMINOR vAlign=top height="100%">"The bill would allow so-called 'Resident Aliens' to receive rebate checks. The Treasury department classifies someone as a 'Resident Alien' based on how much time that person has spent in the United States. No proof of legal presence, however, is required."
</TD><TD width="2%"> </TD><TD vAlign=top><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=discussionTEXT colSpan=2>Bill would dole out millions of dollars to illegals
</TD></TR><TR><TD colSpan=2> </TD></TR><TR><TD class=discussionTEXT colSpan=2>( WASHINGTON, D.C. ) -- Rep. Tom Tancredo (R-Littleton) today criticized the tax package passed by the Democrat-controlled Congress as a giveaway to illegal aliens. The package, among other shortcomings, would direct the Internal Revenue Service to issue checks of up to $600 to individuals and $1,200 to married couples, as well as rebates for any children. The legislation does not, however, contain any provision barring illegal aliens from taking advantage of these benefits.
</TD></TR><TR><TD colSpan=2> </TD></TR><TR><TD class=discussionTEXT colSpan=2>"This package will stimulate one thing for certain: more illegal immigration," said Tancredo. "It's just the latest unfortunate example of American workers footing the bill for illegal aliens."
</TD></TR><TR><TD colSpan=2> </TD></TR><TR><TD class=discussionTEXT colSpan=2>The bill would allow so-called "Resident Aliens" to receive rebate checks. The Treasury department classifies someone as a "Resident Alien" based on how much time that person has spent in the United States. No proof of legal presence, however, is required. The IRS' explanation of the term can be found at: http://www.irs.gov/taxtopics/tc851.html
</TD></TR><TR><TD colSpan=2> </TD></TR><TR><TD class=discussionTEXT colSpan=2>"Worse, a large portion of this money will just be sent back to the home countries of illegal aliens," concluded Tancredo. "So it might stimulate someone's economy -- just not ours."
</TD></TR><TR><TD colSpan=2> </TD></TR><TR><TD class=discussionTEXT colSpan=2>The bill was considered under a procedure in the House of Representatives that did not allow for any opportunity to amend the bill to restrict payments to illegal aliens.
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>Source: http://numbersusa.com</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
 
Joined
Oct 30, 2006
Messages
39,835
Tokens
<SCRIPT type=text/javascript><!--google_ad_client = "pub-3566469879896640";google_ad_width = 468;google_ad_height = 60;google_ad_format = "468x60_as";google_ad_channel ="";google_ad_type = "text";google_color_border = "CCCCCC";google_color_bg = "FFFFFF";google_color_link = "000000";google_color_url = "666666";google_color_text = "333333";//--></SCRIPT><SCRIPT src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js" type=text/javascript></SCRIPT> <IFRAME name=google_ads_frame marginWidth=0 marginHeight=0 src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/ads?client=ca-pub-3566469879896640&dt=1201979913260&lmt=1201979913&format=468x60_as&output=html&correlator=1201979913074&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.anncoulter.com%2Fcgi-local%2Farticle.cgi%3Farticle%3D231&color_bg=FFFFFF&color_text=333333&color_link=000000&color_url=666666&color_border=CCCCCC&ad_type=text&ref=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.anncoulter.com%2Fcgi-local%2Farchives.cgi&cc=179&ga_vid=1667227762.1201979866&ga_sid=1201979866&ga_hid=1891881112&ga_fc=true&flash=9&u_h=800&u_w=1280&u_ah=768&u_aw=1280&u_cd=32&u_tz=-300&u_his=22&u_java=true" frameBorder=0 width=468 scrolling=no height=60 allowTransparency></IFRAME>
'STRAIGHT TALK' EXPRESS TAKES SCENIC ROUTE TO TRUTH
January 23, 2008


John McCain is Bob Dole minus the charm, conservatism and youth. Like McCain, pollsters assured us that Dole was the most "electable" Republican. Unlike McCain, Dole didn't lie all the time while claiming to engage in Straight Talk.

Of course, I might lie constantly too, if I were seeking the Republican presidential nomination after enthusiastically promoting amnesty for illegal aliens, Social Security credit for illegal aliens, criminal trials for terrorists, stem-cell research on human embryos, crackpot global warming legislation and free speech-crushing campaign-finance laws.

I might lie too, if I had opposed the Bush tax cuts, a marriage amendment to the Constitution, waterboarding terrorists and drilling in Alaska.

And I might lie if I had called the ads of the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth "dishonest and dishonorable."

McCain angrily denounces the suggestion that his "comprehensive immigration reform" constituted "amnesty" -- on the ludicrous grounds that it included a small fine. Even the guy who graduated fifth from the bottom of his class at the U.S. Naval Academy didn't fall for this a few years ago.

In 2003, McCain told The Tucson Citizen that "amnesty has to be an important part" of any immigration reform. He also rolled out the old chestnut about America's need for illegals, who do "jobs that American workers simply won't do."

McCain's amnesty bill would have immediately granted millions of newly legalized immigrants Social Security benefits. He even supported allowing work performed as an illegal to count toward Social Security benefits as recently as a vote in 2006 -- now adamantly denied by Mr. Straight Talk.

McCain keeps boasting that he was "the only one" of the Republican presidential candidates who supported the surge in Iraq.

What is he talking about? All Republicans supported the surge -- including Mitt Romney and Rudy Giuliani. The only ones who didn't support it were McCain pals like Sen. Chuck Hagel. Indeed, the surge is the first part of the war on terrorism that caused McCain to break from Hagel in order to support the president.

True, McCain voted for the war. So did Hillary Clinton. Like her, he then immediately started attacking every other aspect of the war on terrorism. (The only difference was, he threw in frequent references to his experience as a POW, which currently outnumber John Kerry's references to being a Vietnam vet.)

Thus, McCain joined with the Democrats in demanding O.J. trials for terrorists at Guantanamo, including his demand that the terrorists have full access to the intelligence files being used to prosecute them.

These days, McCain gives swashbuckling speeches about the terrorists who "will follow us home." But he still opposes dripping water down their noses. He was a POW, you know. Also a member of the Keating 5 scandal, which you probably don't know, and won't -- until he becomes the Republican nominee.

Though McCain was far from the only Republican to support the surge, he does have the distinction of being the only Republican who voted against the Bush tax cuts. (Also the little lamented Sen. Lincoln Chafee, who later left the Republican Party.) Now McCain claims he opposed the tax cuts because they didn't include enough spending cuts. But that wasn't what he said at the time.

To the contrary, in 2001, McCain said he was voting against Bush's tax cuts based on the idiotic talking point of the Democrats. "I cannot in good conscience," McCain said, "support a tax cut in which so many of the benefits go to the most fortunate among us at the expense of middle-class Americans who need tax relief."

McCain started and fanned the vicious anti-Bush myth that, before the 2000 South Carolina primary, the Bush campaign made phone calls to voters calling McCain a "liar, cheat and a fraud" and accusing him of having an illegitimate black child.

On the thin reed of a hearsay account, McCain immediately blamed the calls on Bush. "I'm calling on my good friend George Bush," McCain said, "to stop this now. He comes from a better family. He knows better than this."

Bush denied that his campaign had anything to do with the alleged calls and, in a stunningly magnanimous act, ordered his campaign to release the script of the calls being made in South Carolina.

Bush asked McCain to do the same for his calls implying that Bush was an anti-Catholic bigot, but McCain refused. Instead, McCain responded with a campaign commercial calling Bush a liar on the order of Bill Clinton:

MCCAIN: His ad twists the truth like Clinton. We're all pretty tired of that.

ANNOUNCER: Do we really want another politician in the White House America can't trust?


After massive investigations by the Los Angeles Times and investigative reporter Byron York, among others, it turned out that neither of the alleged calls had been made by the Bush campaign -- nor, it appeared, by anyone else. There was no evidence that any such calls had ever been made, which is unheard of when hundreds of thousands of "robo-calls" are being left on answering machines across the state.

And yet, to this day, the media weep with McCain over Bush's underhanded tactics in the 2000 South Carolina primary.

In fact, the most vicious attack in the 2000 South Carolina primary came from McCain -- and not against his opponent.

Seeking even more favorable press from The New York Times, McCain launched an unprovoked attack against the Rev. Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson, calling them "agents of intolerance." Unlike the phantom "black love child" calls, there's documentary evidence of this smear campaign.

To ensure he would get full media coverage for that little gem, McCain alerted the networks in advance that he planned to attack their favorite whipping boys. Newspaper editors across the country stood in awe of McCain's raw bravery. The New York Times praised him in an editorial that said the Republican Party "has for too long been tied to the cramped ideology of the Falwells and the Robertsons."

Though McCain generally votes pro-life -- as his Arizona constituency requires -- he embraces the loony lingo of the pro-abortion set, repeatedly assuring his pals in the media that he opposes the repeal of Roe v. Wade because it would force women to undergo "illegal and dangerous operations."

Come to think of it, Dole is a million times better than McCain. Why not run him again?

COPYRIGHT 2008 ANN COULTER
DISTRIBUTED BY UNIVERSAL PRESS SYNDICATE
4520 Main Street, Kansas City, MO 64111
 
Joined
Oct 30, 2006
Messages
39,835
Tokens
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=650 border=0><TBODY><TR><TD colSpan=2>
nusa_aaheader.gif
</TD></TR><TR><TD colSpan=2><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 border=0><TBODY><TR><TD rowSpan=3> </TD><TD class=t1fromdatetext>From: Roy Beck, President, NumbersUSA </TD></TR><TR><TD class=t1fromdatetext>Date: Saturday 2FEB08 8:30 p.m. EST </TD></TR><TR><TD class=t1fromdatetext> </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR><TR><TD class=t1redunderbigheader colSpan=2>Will you allow the McCain amnesty to be endorsed in Tuesday's elections? </TD></TR><TR><TD class=t1thinwhitespace colSpan=2> </TD></TR><TR><TD class=t1letterblock vAlign=top align=left width=470>DEAR OPPONENTS OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION,

Remember how desperate all of us felt just before those key votes in 2006 and 2007 on John McCain's amnesties?

But we defied the predictions by massively reacting and blocking the efforts by Sen. McCain and Sen. Kennedy to permanently give American jobs to millions of illegal aliens while enticing millions more to enter!

We can do it again. Will you make it happen? (See suggestions below.) Half of you will be able to vote on Tuesday. And the other half of you can try to influence people in the states where the primaries are being held.

The Super Tuesday Presidential Primaries have become another amnesty vote.

Throughout the campaign, Sen. McCain has said that he will legalize all illegal aliens who have not committed a felony. Between 10 and 18 million illegal aliens would qualify for his amnesty.

If McCain wins the Republican nomination, most of the media have indicated they will interpret that as a vote for McCain's pro-illegal-immigration policies. That may even embolden Congress to try again to pass an amnesty THIS year.

I'm sure you understand the urgency.

Why am I asking you to forward this to everybody?

Because the polls show that most Republicans who have been voting for McCain in the previous primaries are so uninformed that they think he would be TOUGH on illegal immigration.

McCain has confused voters by:
  • ... saying he "got the message" last year when Americans protested his amnesty bill. This suggests that he no longer supports his amnesty. In fact, though, he is merely delaying the amnesty. He has promised to legalize nearly all illegal aliens as soon as the borders are secured.
  • ... saying he will really get tough in securing the borders. In fact, he has consistently voted to weaken border control in the past and has offered no significant details of plans to do a better job in the future (See below.)
With Sen. Obama and Sen. Clinton also pledging full commitment to amnesties, a McCain nomination would mean immigration would be removed as an issue from the fall campaign.

If you are a Democrat and likely to vote for Obama or Clinton because of other issues, you will still want to see them moderate their immigration views toward the American majority's anti-amnesty position. That Democratic moderation could happen if Clinton or Obama had to compete with an anti-amnesty Republican. But I can't see that happening if they are competing with McCain.

If you are a Republican, you will simply want to save your Party from continuing the disastrous immigration policies of the Bush Administration.

If you are an Independent, consider voting in the Republican primary to cast your vote against the McCain amnesty.

Don't take my word for how bad a McCain victory would be. Look below for the unadulterated facts about McCain's past immigration actions.

Can you help rescue America from immigration disaster again on Super Tuesday?

The immigration crisis on Tuesday is no less threatening to America than during those intense battles in 2006 and 2007 when we blocked one amnesty after another. A McCain victory would seem to ensure that no matter who wins in November we will have four more years of the same immigration nightmares we've had under Pres. Bush.

Democratic voters have had no choice because all their candidates support amnesty. But Republican voters have a clear choice between the pro-amnesty McCain and the anti-amnesty Romney, Huckabee and Paul.

Rather than split the anti-amnesty vote among three candidates, you may want to consider voting for whichever anti-amnesty candidate is reported to be highest in your state's polls on Monday, so as to increase the chance of denying delegates to McCain.
.
</TD><TD vAlign=top align=right width=180><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=180 border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=t1bluesubheader>in this email:</TD></TR><TR><TD class=t1subjectstext>EXTREME URGENCY: Forward this message to every email address you have.

1. WHAT YOU CAN DO: Click here
for simple things you can (MUST) do right now.

2. McCAIN's IMMIGRATION PAST: Click here for McCain's past actions favoring illegal immigration.

3. CANDIDATE IMMIGRATION RATINGS: Click here to view the ratings of all candidates in 16 immigration categories. Click on the photo to see the official statements and media quotes that back up the ratings.
</TD></TR><TR><TD class=t1bluesubheader>actions in brief:</TD></TR><TR><TD class=t1subjectstext>Forward this message to every email address you have.

And ask them to forward to everybody they know.

If somebody gets multiple copies, isn't the inconvenience worth the chance to save our country from another immigration disaster.
</TD></TR><TR><TD class=t1bluesubheader>donate now:</TD></TR><TR><TD class=t1generaltext>This faxing system is 100% financed by the voluntary generosity of the 540,000-plus Americans who use it.

Please click here to make any sized donation to keep this grassroots phenomenon strong and effective. </TD></TR><TR><TD class=t1bluesubheader>how to reply:</TD></TR><TR><TD class=t1generaltext vAlign=top>Please do not click 'Reply' button to respond to this message.
To comment about this Alert or to request tech help, click here and fill out our Help Form.
Our staff mans the Help Desk 18 hours a day.
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR><TR><TD class=t1letterblock vAlign=top align=left colSpan=2>1. WHAT YOU CAN DO TO PREVENT AMNESTY DISASTER ON TUESDAY

1. Make plans now on how and when you will vote on Tuesday (if you are in one of the Primary states).

If you have any questions about where to go, ask a friend at church, in your neighborhood or at work. With McCain in the lead in most states, anybody who fails to vote is, in effect, voting for the McCain Amnesty.

2. Phone your friends. Make a list of up to ten or more friends and family members whom you believe will be interested to know that the leading candidates for both major parties favor amnesty. Set aside a block of time to call them. For your convenience, print this page and check off each action as you go.
  • Begin your calls with the following script, adapting it to your own speaking style:

    �Hello, I'm calling with some urgent information that I believe will interest you. I only have 5-10 minutes to speak about it because I have to call others on my list, so forgive me if I get right to the point. Do you believe that illegal immigrants should be given amnesty for breaking the law? 'No.' Then you will be interested to know ....� (Give them a description of the presidential candidates in your own words.) Tell them that, incredibly, many misinformed Floridians voted for John McCain because they mistakenly believed that he was the best candidate for controlling illegal immigration. Make sure they know that John McCain has been the champion of amnesties in the past and even now promises to legalize nearly all the illegal aliens.
  • Use NumbersUSA's overall candidate ratings to answer any questions they may have about any candidates. They may decide to vote for a pro-amnesty candidate for other reasons, but make sure they don't do so because they don't know the real amnesty score on the candidates.
  • Ask them to mark their calendars for the primary voting day and be sure to vote.
  • Tell them why it is important that they make calls the same as you are doing. Ask if they can commit to making up to ten calls to friends and family members (who are not on your list), giving them voting information the same as you have done. When they agree, get their email addresses and tell them to be looking for the email instructions which you will be forwarding to them (a copy of this email from NumbersUSA).
3. Forward this email to every email address you have. Polls show that on average four out of five people to whom you send this will be opposed to an amnesty. You don't want any of them to miss the central truth that
McCAIN = AMNESTY.

Factoring in that some people won't see this email in time and that many of you will have overlapping email lists but also that many of you have email lists running in the hundreds, I am going to assume that each of the half-million of you on average is going to forward to 10 distinct voters and that each of them on average will forward to 5 on average and that each of them will forward to 2 on average.

That would be:

500,000
X 10
-------
5 million
X 5
---------
25 million
X 2
---------
50 million

If we can get this truth about McCain's pro-illegal-immigration positions to 50 million voters before Tuesday (even if half of them don't have Primaries until later), I believe we have an excellent chance of slowing down the McCain Amnesty Express.

You all have done this before when we stopped an amnesty in Congress. Won't you do it now!!!

4. Use your influence and talk about the information in this email at any meetings or gatherings you attend between now and Tuesday.

Perhaps 130 million Americans will spend three hours watching the Super Bowl on Sunday. I don't resent them (you) the entertainment.

But can we all covenant to spend at least 30 minutes before Tuesday in forwarding this email and making some phone calls to protect our entire quality of life from the congestion, the tax costs, the wage depression of tens of millions of additional foreign workers and dependents?

<A name=1>McCAIN'S PAST IMMIGRATION ACTIONS TO SUPPORT ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION

In just the past four years, John McCain has taken the following actions to support illegal immigration:

  • McCAIN: WEAK ON SECURING THE BORDER & ENFORCING IMMIGRATION LAWS
  • 2006- Sen. McCain voted against extending the border fence in the Sessions Amendment (2) to H.R. 5441.
  • 2006- Sen. McCain voted to prevent the border fence from being built by voting in favor of the Manager�s Amendment to S. 2611, the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006.
  • 2006- Sen. McCain voted to allow illegal aliens to receive Social Security by voting to table the Ensign Amendment to S. 2611, the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006.
  • 2006- Sen. McCain voted against funding additional immigration investigators by voting against the Sessions Amendment (1) to H.R. 5441.
  • 2005- Sen. McCain voted against providing funding for additional Border Patrol and ICE agents by voting against the Byrd Amendment to H.R. 1268.
  • McCAIN: THE AMNESTY KING FOR ILLEGAL ALIENS
    • 2007 � Sen. McCain was heavily involved in the backroom negotiations of S. 1348 with Sen. Kennedy and Pres. Bush � this was an amnesty (permanent residency & path to citizenship) for more than 10 million illegal aliens.
    • 2007 � Sen. McCain cast several votes to protect the amnesty in S. 1639 and to move the amnesty toward a vote.
    • 2007- Sen. McCain is a cosponsor of S. 774, the DREAM Act. The bill would grant in-state tuition and amnesty to more than a million illegal aliens under the age of 30.
    • 2007- Sen. McCain is a cosponsor of S. 340, the Agricultural Job Opportunities, Benefits, and Security Act of 2007 (AgJOBS). This bill would grant amnesty to millions of illegal agricultural workers.
    • 2006- Sen. McCain voted in favor of S. 2611, the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006. This bill would have awarded amnesty to 10.2 million illegal aliens.
    • 2005- Sen. McCain and Sen. Kennedy introduced S.1033, an amnesty for virtually all illegal aliens.
    • 2005- Sen. McCain was a cosponsor of S. 239, the AgJOBS amnesty.
    • 2003- Sen. McCain was a cosponsor of S. 1645, the AgJOBS amnesty.
    • 2003- Sen. McCain was a cosponsor the S. 1461 amnesty for millions of illegal aliens.
    AT THE MOMENT, REPUBLICAN VOTERS SEEM PERCHED TO REWARD THIS BEHAVIOR WITH A NOMINATION FOR PRESIDENT.

    IF YOU THINK OTHERWISE, PLEASE TAKE PART IN THE ACTIONS NOTED ABOVE.

    THANKS,
    roysignatural.png
</TD></TR><TR><TD class=t1redoversmallheader vAlign=top align=left colSpan=2>Do you want more or less information?</TD></TR><TR><TD class=t1redundersmallfooter vAlign=top align=left colSpan=2>Do you want fewer emails or to UNSUBSCRIBE from receiving any emails?
As a member of the NumbersUSA Action Network, you have four options about how much email and Alerts you get from us. You can change the frequency of our communication with you at any time by clicking here to go to your Registration Form. There you can choose among Total Activism, Moderate Activism, Limited Activism or No Email. If you feel like you are not getting enough information from us, be sure to change your registration to TOTAL ACTIVISM.
Update your NumbersUSA Interest Survey This may be a good time for you to make sure that you've let us know all of the areas of immigration reform in which you are interested. Click here to further customize your Interest Survey and the type of alerts you receive from us.
P.S. NumbersUSA's financial management meets all the criteria of the IRS as a
non-partisan, non-profit organization, and as an authorized charity of the
Combined Federal Campaign. Handling of donations is overseen and held
accountable by a Board of independent directors and by independent Auditors. </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
 
Joined
Oct 30, 2006
Messages
39,835
Tokens
33 Senators Voted Against English as
America 's Official Language onJune 6, 2007.

On Wed. 6 June 2007 23:35:23 - 0500
Colonel Harry Riley , USA , Ret. wrote:

Senators:

Your vote against an amendment to the
immigration Bill 1348......to make English America's official language
is astounding.

On D-Day, no less, when we honor those
that sacrificed in order to secure the bedrock, character and principles
of America , I can only surmise your vote reflects a loyalty to illegal
aliens.

I don't much care where you come from.
What your religion is. Whether you're black, white, or some other
color...male or female......Democrat, Republican or Independent.......
But I do care when you are a United States Senator representing Citizens
of America ....and Vote against English as the official language of the
United States .

Your vote reflects Betrayal.
Political Surrender. Violates Your
Pledge of Allegiance. Dishonors historical principle. Rejects
Patriotism . Borders on traitorous action and, in my opinion, makes you
unfit to serve as a United States Senator...impeachment...
Recall........Or other appropriate action is warranted or worse.

Four of you voting against English as
America 's Official Language are Presidential Candidates: Senator
Biden, Senator Clinton, Senator Dodd and Senator Obama.

Four Senators vying to lead America , but
won't or
Don't have the courage to cast a vote in
favor of "English" as America 's Official Language when 91% of American
Citizens want English officially designated as our language.

This is the second time in the last
several months this list of Senators have disgraced themselves as
"policital
Hacks"...... Unworthy as Senators and
certainly unqualified to serve as President of the United States .

If America is as angry as I am, you will
realize a backlash so stunning it will literally "rock you out of your
panties"......... And preferably totally out of the United States
Senate.

The entire immigration bill is a
farce... Your action only confirms this really isn't about
America .....it is about self-serving politics......despicable at best.
It has been said:
;
"Never Argue with an Idiot....They'll
drag you down to their level!"

The following Senators voted against
making English the official language
Of America :

Akaka (D-HI)
Bayh (D-IN)
Biden (D-DE) (Wants to be President)
Bingaman (D-NM)
Boxer (D-CA)
Cantwell (D-WA)
&n bsp;
Clinton (D-NY) (Wants to be President)
Dayton (D-MN)
Dodd ( D- MN ) wants to be president
Domenici (R-NM) coward. Protecting his
senate seat
Durbin (D-IL)
Feingold (D-win) - not unusual for him
Feinstein (D-ca)
Harkin (D-IA)
Inouye (D-hi)
Jeffords (I-VT)
Kennedy - (D-ma)
& nbsp; Kerry (D-ma) (tried to be president)
Kohl (D-WI))
Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Leahy (D-VT)
Levin (D-MI)
Lieberman (I-CT) Disappointment
here.....
Menendez (D-NJ)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Murray (D-WA)
Obama (D-IL) (Wants to be President)
Reed (D-RI)
Reid (D-NV) Senate Majority Leader
&nbs p; As Lazar (D-CO)
Sarbanes (D-MD)
Schumer (D-NY)
Stabenow (D-M

PRESIDENT ABRAHAM LINCOLN
"Congressmen who willfully take actions
during wartime that damage morale and undermine the military are
saboteurs and should be arrested, exiled or Hanged!!!

PLEASE KEEP THIS GOING AROUND THE UNITED
STATES TILL THE ELECTION!
Join http://numbersusa.com
 
Joined
Oct 30, 2006
Messages
39,835
Tokens
Here's what the Dallas Morning News isn't reporting on, choosing
instead to focus on the racial politics of beans: In a landmark ruling
handed down on January 31, U.S. District Judge E. Richard Webber
decisively upheld the right of local governments to enforce laws
against illegal immigration by denying business licenses to employers
who hire illegal aliens. Judge Webbers ruling rejected every argument
presented by the American Civil Liberties Union and the Mexican
American Legal Defense and Educational Fund challenging Valley Parks
authority to suspend the licenses of businesses that employ illegal
aliens.

Lead Counsel for Valley Park is Kris Kobach, who recently consulted on
drafting Farmers Branch Oridnance 2952.

Have a great weekend,
Tim Scott
http://hometownfarmersbranch.blogspot.com


http://stoptheaclu.org
 
Joined
Oct 30, 2006
Messages
39,835
Tokens
McCAIN'S PAST IMMIGRATION ACTIONS TO SUPPORT ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION

In just the past four years, John McCain has taken the following actions to support illegal immigration:

McCAIN: WEAK ON SECURING THE BORDER & ENFORCING IMMIGRATION LAWS

2006- Sen. McCain voted against extending the border fence in the Sessions Amendment (2) to H.R. 5441.

2006- Sen. McCain voted to prevent the border fence from being built by voting in favor of the Manager’s Amendment to S. 2611, the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006.

2006- Sen. McCain voted to allow illegal aliens to receive Social Security by voting to table the Ensign Amendment to S. 2611, the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006.

2006- Sen. McCain voted against funding additional immigration investigators by voting against the Sessions Amendment (1) to H.R. 5441.

2005- Sen. McCain voted against providing funding for additional Border Patrol and ICE agents by voting against the Byrd Amendment to H.R. 1268.
McCAIN: THE AMNESTY KING FOR ILLEGAL ALIENS
2007 – Sen. McCain was heavily involved in the backroom negotiations of S. 1348 with Sen. Kennedy and Pres. Bush – this was an amnesty (permanent residency & path to citizenship) for more than 10 million illegal aliens.

2007 – Sen. McCain cast several votes to protect the amnesty in S. 1639 and to move the amnesty toward a vote.

2007- Sen. McCain is a cosponsor of S. 774, the DREAM Act. The bill would grant in-state tuition and amnesty to more than a million illegal aliens under the age of 30.

2007- Sen. McCain is a cosponsor of S. 340, the Agricultural Job Opportunities, Benefits, and Security Act of 2007 (AgJOBS). This bill would grant amnesty to millions of illegal agricultural workers.

2006- Sen. McCain voted in favor of S. 2611, the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006. This bill would have awarded amnesty to 10.2 million illegal aliens.

2005- Sen. McCain and Sen. Kennedy introduced S.1033, an amnesty for virtually all illegal aliens.

2005- Sen. McCain was a cosponsor of S. 239, the AgJOBS amnesty.

2003- Sen. McCain was a cosponsor of S. 1645, the AgJOBS amnesty.

2003- Sen. McCain was a cosponsor the S. 1461 amnesty for millions of illegal aliens.

AT THE MOMENT, REPUBLICAN VOTERS SEEM PERCHED TO REWARD THIS BEHAVIOR WITH A NOMINATION FOR PRESIDENT.

IF YOU THINK OTHERWISE, PLEASE TAKE PART IN THE ACTIONS NOTED ABOVE.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,118,698
Messages
13,558,481
Members
100,671
Latest member
nhacaigoal123one
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com