This I agree.with but there are many on this board who believe that KKK is a democratic ideology because hell.back then they were.democratic my argument is thise people were conservatives for the most part stemming from the south. The party names.have changed but the southern conservative and liberal north remain
That's not true, that's the false narrative the left and the democrats sell. Dixiecrats remained democrats and were reelected as democrats their entire lives with one exception. Furthermore, no Republicans changed parties over this. Why would a racist politician change his party because they weren't racist enough to join the party that can be argued was actually responsible for passing the voting rights bill? Of course that doesn't make sense. Anyhow, a southern democratic president signed the bill which was supported more by Republicans (% wise) in both houses than it was Democrats. In the Senate it was 30-2 on the Republican side, just 47-16-4 (read 47-20) on the democratic side. If the Republicans don't help LBJ end the Democratic filibuster, the bill may never see the light of day. One Dixiecrat started the KKK in his home state and left office a democratic hero when he died in 2010. Another Dixiecrat was Bill Clinton's mentor. People rewriting this history is poppycock.
Politics is not nearly as much north vs south as the criminally colluding lying media try to sell us, as well as all other democrats who like to talk as if they have the morally higher ground. It's more urban vs suburban and rural. And yes, the voting rights act did help create that divide because 90+% of African Americans vote democrat every election cycle and they dominate the urban vote. But the voting act not alone. LBJ and the democrats also passed the great society, which put welfare and poverty on steroids and those voters also inhabit urban areas. So it's the misguided impression of the voting rights act of 1965 and the war on poverty that created more poverty that divided the nation into poor urban areas vs the rest of the country (with a few exceptions of course).
Democrats have a history of rewriting history, they're enabled to do so because they carry their false narrative though the media, Hollywood and through unionized educators. The most recent examples?
1) taking credit for Clinton's surpluses which were created by Newt's budget. A budget Bubba gets credit for signing, but democratic swamp dwellers who OPPOSED that budget take credit for it as they mock the party that wrote the bill for creating deficits.
2) their votes to remove Saddam from office, blaming it on Bush lies while ignoring their calls for removal long before Bush became POTUS
3) using Poppy's "NO NEW TAXES" line against him in 1992 when he gave them the tax increases THEY WANTED. Imagine that, the democrats negotiate and demand tax increases and then get to use those tax increases against the president that signed their bill
Priceless