Ehhhhh. Think again. Don't try to argue on an intellectual level with me, because, you are going to lose, as cocky as that may sound. I do this for a LIVING, and, I have MUCH MORE than a fundamental understanding of statistics. Polling 750,000 people means NOTHING when the ultimate sample will consist of 25 million. With that sample size, assuming that you poll 750k, you are talking about an 8-10% margin of error, so, again, don't try to pass yourself off as a mathematician.
And, as for my "sometimes weak arguments" comment is concerned, I will refer you to the fact that at the very least, I watched the show consistently, which you didn't do, so, how you are qualified to have ANY argument with me, let alone an intelligent one, is beyond me.
By the way, there was less than 1% of the vote separating these two, as stated on the show in the last few minutes, which kind of blows your whole "aol poll" theory right to pieces.
Ehhhh. Try again, friend.
JP
And, as for my "sometimes weak arguments" comment is concerned, I will refer you to the fact that at the very least, I watched the show consistently, which you didn't do, so, how you are qualified to have ANY argument with me, let alone an intelligent one, is beyond me.
By the way, there was less than 1% of the vote separating these two, as stated on the show in the last few minutes, which kind of blows your whole "aol poll" theory right to pieces.
Ehhhh. Try again, friend.
JP