Japan has bigger problems than any monetary/fiscal policy though.
It is an island with limited natural resources and an aging population.
I love how Sheriff Joe just uses random shit he finds on the Internet and doesn't realize how dumb he is. What the fuck does compensation growth have to do with whether or not Abenomics is working. You are really dumb dude.
The same could be said about Hong Kong and Singapore, yet they're booming.
According to this: http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0934666.html Hong Kong and Singapore both have over 20 times the population density of Japan.That's not true at all, Hong Kong and Singapore's population is growing at reasonable rate.
Comparing small economies like Hong Kong and Sigapore to large economies like Japan is ridiculous. If Hong Kong or Singapore ever got to 100 million people, which they couldn't because they don't have the resources... they would experience the same problems every other large country has.
According to this: http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0934666.html Hong Kong and Singapore both have over 20 times the population density of Japan.
You said if they reached the population they would have the same problems as Japan due to lack of resources, despite the fact they have much higher population density and they don't have those problems at all. I also love how you say you can't compare Hong Kong/Singapore to Japan since their economies are different sizes, yet you use Greece as proof that austerity wouldn't work in America, despite there being a bigger gap in the size of economies of usa/ Greece compared to Hong Kong/Singapore & Japan.Who cares, they are both small little service based economies.
You said if they reached the population they would have the same problems as Japan due to lack of resources, despite the fact they have much higher population density and they don't have those problems at all. I also love how you say you can't compare Hong Kong/Singapore to Japan since their economies are different sizes, yet you use Greece as proof that austerity wouldn't work in America, despite there being a bigger gap in the size of economies of usa/ Greece compared to Hong Kong/Singapore & Japan.
I'm not saying it is. But if you're saying that japan doesn't have the resources to support their population, then that would be true of Singapore and Hong Kong, since they have a larger population compared to their resources.Population density has nothing to do with the number of people in the country. That's a ridiculous argument.
I'm not saying it is. But if you're saying that japan doesn't have the resources to support their population, then that would be true of Singapore and Hong Kong, since they have a larger population compared to their resources.
It is a relevant argument since both Hong Kong and Singapore have few natural resources, like Japan, have a much higher population density than Japan, which means there are less resourses to go around, yet both have much stronger economies. Singapore 's economy isn't service based, It's main source of revenue is exporting electronics and chemicals. They get those things by importing the materials, then refining them, then exporting them.Population density has nothing to do with how many resources you have to support your population. It's not even a relevant argument. Singapore and HK have small populations and are dependent on a service economy. Similar to those small Middle East countries that are filthy rich because of oil. You can't run that kind of economy when you have 120,000,000 more people.
And that is simply because it [Keynesian economics] uses mathematics in it's approach. Austrian's live in la la land and just think everything magically works out with out any sort of control. That the American people possess some sort of inherited intelligence that leads us to collectively make the correct decisions with out any one telling us what is right or wrong."
http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=207495&page=2&p=4458893#post4458893