SkinsRaj28 said:
Yes, I have...and like I said, a wood bat has more than enough pop, but to equate it to that of an aluminum bat is going too far. By the way, for the record, yes I am gay.
Damn, can't believe you came out of the closet like that Skins????? :missingte
Anyway, I feel like contributing to this discussion. Supposively, if you hit both on the sweet spot there is no difference. I never hit and I never did any homosexual studies of measuring of any sort (no offense Skins), just word of mouth. It's just the fact that the ball jumps off the aluminum bat in every other part of it as well. Hitters can get jammed and crush basehits.
I remember Frank Thomas took BP with metal, and he would crush every ball for a homerun. And everyone was saying that the bat had more pop. Well, yes and no. It's just that even if he missed a ball a bit, it still left the yard. But comparing sweet spots, the ball jumps off both about the same apparently.
But the #1 reason by far that college baseball uses aluminum bats over wood bats is $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$. A good wood bat costs about $120. And they break all of the time, especially with an inexperienced college hitter hitting judy jam jobs 4 times a game. Metal bats are roughly $150 and they rarely break. Small schools can't afford bats with their budget. Shit, some large schools can't afford to pay for wood bats year in and year out. It's estimated that each player would need about 10 wood bats throughout the course of a season (I think more though), where to contrast they would only need 1, maybe 2 metal bats. So pretty much each school would have to multiply their "bat budget" times 10 per year.
15 hitters x $150 = $2,250
15 hitters x $120 x 10 bats = $18,000
Shit ton of money to spend just on bats, especially for North South Dakota Community College Eastern Campus.
The funny thing is that baseballs are actually the greatest expense of any program.