9-11, 20 years later, do you think it was an inside job?

[sportsm60]

More parts of the puzzle:

https://cairnsnews.org/2013/09/15/911-300-billion-in-gold-bullion-missing-from-wtc-basement/

[FONT=&quot]Just before 9/11, there was an “extraordinary” amount of put-options placed on United Airlines and American Airlines stocks

[/FONT][FONT=&quot] $166,770,000,000 worth of gold bullion that went missing from where it was being stored in the basement of the WTC complex[/FONT]

 

[Acebb]

You are just an uninformed idiot who is too stupid to do any proper research, just like Willie!

Here is some research for you, retard.

Jet fuel burns at 800 to 1500 degrees Fahrenheit, not hot enough to melt steel (2750 degrees Fahrenheit). However, experts agree that for the towers to collapse, their steel frames didn't need to melt, they just had to lose some of their structural strength—and that required exposure to much less heat. "I have never seen melted steel in a building fire," says retired New York deputy fire chief Vincent Dunn, author of The Collapse Of Burning Buildings: A Guide To Fireground Safety. "But I've seen a lot of twisted, warped, bent and sagging steel. What happens is that the steel tries to expand at both ends, but when it can no longer expand, it sags and the surrounding concrete cracks."

But jet fuel wasn't the only thing burning, notes Forman Williams, a professor of engineering at the University of California, San Diego, and one of seven structural engineers and fire experts that Popular Mechanics consulted. He says that while the jet fuel was the catalyst for the WTC fires, the resulting inferno was intensified by the combustible material inside the buildings, including rugs, curtains, furniture and paper. NIST reports that pockets of fire hit 1832 degrees Fahrenheit.

"The jet fuel was the ignition source," Williams tells Popular Mechanics. "It burned for maybe 10 minutes, and [the towers] were still standing in 10 minutes. It was the rest of the stuff burning afterward that was responsible for the heat transfer that eventually brought them down."

 

[Acebb]

Obviously in your eyes hear say evidence overrules hard evidence by scientists and investigators. I suppose you believe that all those scientists are lying
about finding thermite in the rubble too?

There is no "hard evidence" you've referenced at all.

 

[sportsm60]

You provided a link to a conspiracy Web site and called it "research"

LOL

This is one of many links out there with the same info. What do you consider to be credible? MSNBC?

 

[Acebb]

Here is a longer vid, only about 15 min that covers some other points as well.

You are correct Will is mimicking LIB behaviour REALLY hard on this one.....He literally is just choosing to go with the MSM rather than actually research the info.

WTC7 The Smoking GUN
https://www.bitchute.com/video/A0xlzyNybsKv/

What is the motive for someone on an "inside job" to blow up that building when terrorists attacked the WTC and the Pentagon?

 

[sportsm60]

Here is some research for you, retard.

Jet fuel burns at 800 to 1500 degrees Fahrenheit, not hot enough to melt steel (2750 degrees Fahrenheit). However, experts agree that for the towers to collapse, their steel frames didn't need to melt, they just had to lose some of their structural strength—and that required exposure to much less heat. "I have never seen melted steel in a building fire," says retired New York deputy fire chief Vincent Dunn, author of The Collapse Of Burning Buildings: A Guide To Fireground Safety. "But I've seen a lot of twisted, warped, bent and sagging steel. What happens is that the steel tries to expand at both ends, but when it can no longer expand, it sags and the surrounding concrete cracks."

But jet fuel wasn't the only thing burning, notes Forman Williams, a professor of engineering at the University of California, San Diego, and one of seven structural engineers and fire experts that Popular Mechanics consulted. He says that while the jet fuel was the catalyst for the WTC fires, the resulting inferno was intensified by the combustible material inside the buildings, including rugs, curtains, furniture and paper. NIST reports that pockets of fire hit 1832 degrees Fahrenheit.

"The jet fuel was the ignition source," Williams tells Popular Mechanics. "It burned for maybe 10 minutes, and [the towers] were still standing in 10 minutes. It was the rest of the stuff burning afterward that was responsible for the heat transfer that eventually brought them down."

What about all the thermite that was found in the rubble. Are all those investigators lying? I would take their word over anyones in our government!

 

[sportsm60]

There is no "hard evidence" you've referenced at all.

LOL. Just like there is no hard evidence of 2020 election fraud

 

[Willie99]

Obviously in your eyes hear say evidence overrules hard evidence by scientists and investigators. I suppose you believe that all those scientists are lying
about finding thermite in the rubble too?

I cite studies from multiple independent agencies, witnesses, reporting, worldwide intelligence agencies, every investigating agency known to mankind

You cite a conspiracy website

You say my arguments are flawed. More truther brilliance

 

[MAGAking1]

What is the motive for someone on an "inside job" to blow up that building when terrorists attacked the WTC and the Pentagon?

Pal I see it is folly to argue with those who refuse to research the info for themselves.

I posted 2 nice , relatively short videos about Bldg7.....you will find many answers or at least should have MANY more questions about the MSM narrative after watching them.


PS.
There was no plane at the Pentagon.


Hopefully one day you Truth Deniers will wake up and research this info for yourself rather than parrot you MSM gods.

 

[Acebb]

Government and independent evidence corroborates Thermitic explosives used to bring down all three WTC Towers on 9/11. (sources 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8)

Note: When you click on any of those links, it does not corroborate these claims.

Link 6 does not work

Link #1 does not make any claims, in fact it concludes that further research is needed.

Link #2 talks about the particles found, does not claim they are unusual in any way at all.

Link #3 "page not found"

Link #4 Says "NIST scientists conducted tests of steel from the WTC buildings to measure their mechanical properties at normal and elevated temperatures. These tests led to the development and validation of performance criteria for fire resistive steel. This type of steel, which was not available at the time the WTC was built, would not necessarily prevent a building from collapsing during a fire, but it would give occupants more time to escape. "

Which is no way some proof of usual substances found.


You were saying something about research?

 

[MAGAking1]

I cite studies from multiple independent agencies, witnesses, reporting, worldwide intelligence agencies, every investigating agency known to mankind

You cite a conspiracy website

You say my arguments are flawed. More truther brilliance

No you havent, you just keep saying so and so said this.....thousand and thousands said this......milllions and milions arent hiding this



Everything is so conflated, there were so many parts to 911.
You act like just because people died that it could not have been an inside job designed for many purposes that revolve around money, power and control.

 

[Acebb]

Pal I see it is folly to argue with those who refuse to research the info for themselves.

I posted 2 nice , relatively short videos about Bldg7.....you will find many answers or at least should have MANY more questions about the MSM narrative after watching them.


PS.
There was no plane at the Pentagon.


Hopefully one day you Truth Deniers will wake up and research this info for yourself rather than parrot you MSM gods.

There absolutely was a plane at the Pentagon.

Why are you, stating something that is factually false, calling anyone a "truth denier"?

 

[sportsm60]

What is the motive for someone on an "inside job" to blow up that building when terrorists attacked the WTC and the Pentagon?

To crank up the industrial military complex and get us in middle east wars, making the global elite trillions in contracts selling our government
war machines and everything the military needs. Taking oil, poppy fields in Afghanistan, and probably lots of other things we will never know about.
Meanwhile our crooked politicians grow wealthier with massive kickbacks. What do you think the deep state is?

 

[Acebb]

What about all the thermite that was found in the rubble. Are all those investigators lying? I would take their word over anyones in our government!

ointer:

 

[Willie99]

Here is some research for you, retard.

Jet fuel burns at 800 to 1500 degrees Fahrenheit, not hot enough to melt steel (2750 degrees Fahrenheit). However, experts agree that for the towers to collapse, their steel frames didn't need to melt, they just had to lose some of their structural strength—and that required exposure to much less heat. "I have never seen melted steel in a building fire," says retired New York deputy fire chief Vincent Dunn, author of The Collapse Of Burning Buildings: A Guide To Fireground Safety. "But I've seen a lot of twisted, warped, bent and sagging steel. What happens is that the steel tries to expand at both ends, but when it can no longer expand, it sags and the surrounding concrete cracks."

But jet fuel wasn't the only thing burning, notes Forman Williams, a professor of engineering at the University of California, San Diego, and one of seven structural engineers and fire experts that Popular Mechanics consulted. He says that while the jet fuel was the catalyst for the WTC fires, the resulting inferno was intensified by the combustible material inside the buildings, including rugs, curtains, furniture and paper. NIST reports that pockets of fire hit 1832 degrees Fahrenheit.

"The jet fuel was the ignition source," Williams tells Popular Mechanics. "It burned for maybe 10 minutes, and [the towers] were still standing in 10 minutes. It was the rest of the stuff burning afterward that was responsible for the heat transfer that eventually brought them down."

there are so many articles and reports and professionals and studies that disprove every argument they make, you have to want to avoid them to miss them all

here's the beauty of being a truther

1) You don't have to have any answers
2) they're like the Scottish Clans, they all hate the English, but they all have a different agenda. They don't even agree with each other, many of their arguments contradict each other, but they all think we're "uniformed"

Thanks for chiming in. If a few others did, we can debunk everything. Not enough time in the day, or the interest to do so, on my part

 

[Acebb]

To crank up the industrial military complex and get us in middle east wars, making the global elite trillions in contracts selling our government
war machines and everything the military needs. Taking oil, poppy fields in Afghanistan, and probably lots of other things we will never know about.
Meanwhile our crooked politicians grow wealthier with massive kickbacks. What do you think the deep state is?

Except, terrorists attacked the WTC and Pentagon.

That is a fact.

How does blowing up WTC 7 help get America to war?

 

[MAGAking1]

there are so many articles and reports and professionals and studies that disprove every argument they make, you have to want to avoid them to miss them all

here's the beauty of being a truther

1) You don't have to have any answers
2) they're like the Scottish Clans, they all hate the English, but they all have a different agenda. They don't even agree with each other, many of their arguments contradict each other, but they all think we're "uniformed"

Thanks for chiming in. If a few others did, we can debunk everything. Not enough time in the day, or the interest to do so, on my part

More of Willie just saying.....so and so says this...keep parroting your MSM leaders BIg Will

 

[Willie99]

Except, terrorists attacked the WTC and Pentagon.

That is a fact.

How does blowing up WTC 7 help get America to war?

I don't know about you, but without building seven going down, I'm opposing the war






For those wondering what I'm talking about, 9/11 is supposedly a false flag meant to anger Americans enough to go to war

Does anyone, besides a truther, ever talk about WTC 7? Hence it means something to them, butt nobody else, and it certainly doesn't support their false flag narrative. It actually diminishes their argument, but that would take a little thinking to figure it out

And with that, I'm outta here

Ciao bello

 

[sportsm60]

There is no "hard evidence" you've referenced at all.

Some of the links probably dont work because it is an old article. You can do your own research, there are tons of links on duckduckgo on the subject.

Just one more:

https://www.ae911truth.org/evidence/high-temperature-thermitic-reactions


[h=2]High-Temperature Thermitic Reactions | Twin Towers[/h]

Despite the illegal destruction of most of the structural steel and other debris in the months after 9/11, a sizeable body of forensic evidence has been developed over the years by government investigators and independent researchers. Much of the available evidence indicates the occurrence of high-temperature thermitic reactions before, during, and after the destruction of the towers.

NFPA 921: Guide for Fire and Explosion Investigations, which serves as the national guide for fire and explosion investigations in the United States, advises that “All available fuel sources should be considered and eliminated until one fuel can be identified as meeting all the physical damage criteria as well as any other significant data.” [Emphasis added.] On the potential use of exotic accelerants, including thermite, NFPA 921 further advises: “Indicators of exotic accelerants include...melted steel or concrete.”


The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), however, did not follow NFPA 921 in its investigation of the World Trade Center destruction. Instead, it handled the evidence of high-temperature thermitic reactions in much the same way it handled the evidence regarding the structural behavior of the buildings: either denying it, ignoring it, or providing speculative explanations not based upon scientific analysis.
[h=3]Molten Metal Pouring out of WTC 2[/h]Just before 9:52 AM, molten metal began pouring out of WTC 2 near the northeast corner of the 80th floor and continued to flow with increasing intensity until the collapse at 9:59 AM. NIST provided ample documentation of the pouring molten metal, which it described and hypothesized as follows:

 

[MAGAking1]

IM just going to leave this here for those who want to research the info. Ive posted quite a few vids already.

People have to make realizations at their own pace.....I like MOST everyone was emotional and went along with the narrative about 911 for years....I did research it back then but talked myself out of all the evidence that was presented, I said these people are "conspiracy theorists", "how could this many people be involved"
or even "Why would someone lie on this scale"

I didnt understand how wide spread the disinformation agents were I mean popular mechanics and Mythbusters seemed like honest neutral reporters RIGHT? Sure they are in general , UNTIL their masters say "Do it this way"

I also didnt understand how evil the enemy can be.....There is no way our own govt would be involved in harming their own citizens RIGHT? There is no such thing as the NWO RIGHT?

Any way , arguing about it wont change any minds....but hopefully some of you who are so willing to accept the lie today may wake up on a future date looking for truth and you can start here with these organized links.

https://files.catbox.moe/ire34b.pdf