So planes didn't hit the WTC?
So it was an implosion? One that didn't make any noise? One that wasn't recorded by any seismograph in the area? Or are all those scientists and universities lying too?
So it was an implosion? That started on the 90th floor? LMFAO Have you ever seen an implosion?
What happened to all the people on the planes? Or were they just a diversion? Or were there no planes at all?
Enquiring minds want to know
I love asking the questions, this is just too fucking easy
So planes didn't hit the WTC?
So it was an implosion? One that didn't make any noise? One that wasn't recorded by any seismograph in the area? Or are all those scientists and universities lying too?
So it was an implosion? That started on the 90th floor? LMFAO Have you ever seen an implosion?
What happened to all the people on the planes? Or were they just a diversion? Or were there no planes at all?
Enquiring minds want to know
I love asking the questions, this is just too fucking easy
And this means what again? The WTC was not hit by planes?
Was it a hologram?
A silent implosion?
Nuclear bomb without radiation?
What did your 1000 scientists, which I'm calling bullshit on to begin with, say was the root cause? Where did they get their secret data?
Don't raise questions, try telling everyone what happened in a manner that we can't question
And since you think hundreds of thousands of professionals are idiots, I can call your mere 1000 scientists idiots
Sorry Willie, let me take a swing at this first. I thought this 9/11 stuff was over here for awhile with the nice lists of questions that remain unanswered by our latest round of truthers....
Originally Posted by SteamDaddy
how did the BBC and CNN report WTC 7 collasping before it actually fell
Because they had already been told that the collapse was emminent, as the firefighters who were at the scene already had known for hours. They had, as news angencies do, a headline all ready to go for when the building came down.
So this proves what? That the BBC and CNN rushed a story that had been anticipated for hours? :thumbsup:
Originally Posted by SteamDaddy
In your own words, how and why did the police, firefighters, rescue workers on the scene of WTC 7 tell everyone in the area to stand back, "the building is going to blow up?
Was it really police, firefighters, and rescue workers all out there running around saying the building was about to "blow up"? Because all I've seen is one video of someone saying that. And did he literally mean it was going to "blow up"? :think2:
If you're really saying that all those people said it was about to "blow up" then you must also be saying that they were all in on it too, right? Firefighters, rescue workers, police...all in on the conspiracy. And don;t forget CNN and the BBC, they have to know too, right? :thumbsup:
If you really give a flying fuck what thepeople on the scene DID have to say about WTC (which you don;t), then you'll read these quotes...
1. They backed me off the rig because Seven was in dead jeopardy, so they backed everybody off and moved us to the rear end of Vesey Street. We just stood there for a half hour, 40 minutes, because Seven was in imminent collapse and finally did come down. –Firefighter Thomas Smith
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/package...IC/9110246.PDF
2. Chief Nigro directed me to continue monitoring conditions at the site. Specifically to monitor number 7 World Trade Center. We were very concerned with the collapse potential there, and to do whatever I could do to ensure site safety in that no additional people became injured. –FDNY Deputy Chief Harold Meyers http://graphics8.nytimes.com/package...IC/9110382.PDF
3. We were concerned that the fires on several floors and the missing steel would result in the building collapsing. So for the next five or six hours we kept firefighters from working anywhere near that building, which included the whole north side of the World Trade Center complex. –Chief Frank Fellini http://graphics8.nytimes.com/package...IC/9110217.PDF
4. We made searches. We attempted to put some of the fire out, but we had a pressure problem. I forget the name of the Deputy. Some Deputy arrived at the scene and thought that the building was too dangerous to continue with operations, so we evacuated number 7 World Trade Center. –Captain Anthony Varriale http://graphics8.nytimes.com/package...IC/9110313.PDF
5. I remember him screaming about number 7, No. 7, that they wanted everybody away from 7 because 7 was definitely going to collapse, they don't know when, but it's definitely going to come down, just get the hell out of the way, everybody get away from it, make sure you're away from it, that's an order, you know, stuff like that. –Firefighter Edward Kennedy http://graphics8.nytimes.com/package...IC/9110502.PDF
6. Early on, there was concern that 7 World Trade Center might have been both impacted by the collapsing tower and had several fires in it and there was a concern that it might collapse. So we instructed that a collapse area --
Q. A collapse zone?
A. Yeah -- be set up and maintained so that when the expected collapse of 7 happened, we wouldn't have people working in it. There was considerable discussion with Con Ed regarding the substation in that building and the feeders and the oil coolants and so on. And their concern was of the type of fire we might have when it collapsed. They shut down the power, and when it did collapse, the things that they were concerned with would have been [sic]. That's about it. –Chief Frank Cruthers
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/package...IC/9110179.PDF
7. There was concern. I had gone up to take a look at it, because I knew that the telephone company building, which is 140 West Street, was next to 7 World Trade Center, and there was a concern that if 7 World Trade came down, what would happen to this building? We went in there, we checked it out. There were some people in there. We made them evacuate and I went in the back to see what was happening. I went back and I reminded whoever the chief was, I don't know if it was Chief McKavanagh or Chief Blaich, that with 7 World Trade Center in danger of collapsing, you had to be careful, because Con Edison had big transformers in the back that supplied the lower half of Manhattan. So we had to be concerned about electricity, that this may be energized or not be energized. –Firefighter Eugene Kelty Jr.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/package...IC/9110261.PDF
8. "We heard reports all day long of 7 World Trade possibly coming down. ...We heard that all day long, all the warnings." –Firefighter Christopher Patrick Murray
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/package...IC/9110327.PDF
9. It could have been an hour, hour and a half we were doing that before we were ordered to move away from that part of Tower No. 1 because there was an imminent danger of collapse of World Trade Center No. 5 and 7. –Firefighter Vandon Williams http://graphics8.nytimes.com/package...IC/9110282.PDF
10. Civilian photographer Tom Franklin: “Much of what happened to me on September 11 is a blur, but this moment I clearly remember: It was 4:45 p.m., and all the firemen and rescue workers were evacuating Ground Zero after word came that a third building -- WTC 7 -- was ready to fall.” http://archives.cjr.org/year/02/2/franklin.asp
11. Unidentified speaker in video: "Keep your eye on that building, it'll be coming down soon."
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/IM...c7_blow_up.wmv
12. CBS-TV Reporter Vince DeMentri, who sneaked past security barriers to get close to the scene:
...Building 7 was going to collapse. That appears to be what has happened now. I don't know exactly how many stories the building is, Dan, but standing at the base of the building and watching it burn about an hour ago, it looked to be on the order of 50, 60 stories. http://www.911podcasts.com/view.php?...6&typ=0&form=0
13. So that was basically we watched that one come down. It was on fire first, I think the fourth floor was on fire they said. We were like are you guys going to put that fire out? I was like, you know, they are going to wait for it to burn down and it collapsed. So that's when I knew high rise buildings you know (inaudible).
Q: You were still there?
A: Yes, so basically they measured out how far the building was going to come, so we knew exactly where we could stand.
Q: So they just put you in a safe area, safe enough for when that building came down?
A: 5 blocks. 5 blocks away. We still could see. Exactly right on point, the cloud just stopped right there. Then when that building was coming down, that same rumbling. –EMT Decosta Wright
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/package...IC/9110054.PDF
You are right, he aint interested in the evidence. He cannot discredit this video or the article I posted. He is just another brain washed sheep and probably a RINO too!
Just pasting stuff from 14 years ago, don't have time to reinvent the wheel. If somebody hasn't figured this out after 20 years, firgetaboutit
A list of people, experts, engineers, scientists... truthers think are lying
forensic engineers
implosion engineers
Seismographs
Columbia Univ
Purdue
MIT
Insurance investigators
private investigators
military investigators
airline investigators
the worldwide media
international intelligence agencies
OBL
Al-Jazera
airline security
NYPD
NYFD
the fact that there is no litigation
the fact that there is no prosecution
the fact that every fucking new study arrives at the same conclusion
the fact that fringers have nothing new after 6 years (make that 20 years)
the overwhelming one sided weight of the evidence
the families of the deceased passengers, their neighbors, friends, collogues, employers
the cemeteries where the deceased are buried
my own observation
a little common sense
There is no litigation because the truther leaders know they'll be exposed. So they'd rather just keep lying to their flock, they don't need to prove anything to them and never have. It's about faith. It's a fringer religion.
like I said, 20 million plus are covering this up, and not one of them as cracked
and they say I'm uninformed, LOL
Just pasting stuff from 14 years ago, don't have time to reinvent the wheel. If somebody hasn't figured this out after 20 years, firgetaboutit
A list of people, experts, engineers, scientists... truthers think are lying
forensic engineers
implosion engineers
Seismographs
Columbia Univ
Purdue
MIT
Insurance investigators
private investigators
military investigators
airline investigators
the worldwide media
international intelligence agencies
OBL
Al-Jazera
airline security
NYPD
NYFD
the fact that there is no litigation
the fact that there is no prosecution
the fact that every fucking new study arrives at the same conclusion
the fact that fringers have nothing new after 6 years (make that 20 years)
the overwhelming one sided weight of the evidence
the families of the deceased passengers, their neighbors, friends, collogues, employers
the cemeteries where the deceased are buried
my own observation
a little common sense
There is no litigation because the truther leaders know they'll be exposed. So they'd rather just keep lying to their flock, they don't need to prove anything to them and never have. It's about faith. It's a fringer religion.
like I said, 20 million plus are covering this up, and not one of them as cracked
and they say I'm uninformed, LOL