4,000 US deaths, a handful of images

[JoeContrarian]

:lolBIG: That takes the cake...deep philosophical thoughts from the Batman movie that we can all apply to our lives.

Hand over your voter ID...do not pass go...do not collect $200.

:missingte

I gotta admit, when I read that I almost spit out my Mountain Dew on my keyboard.

Kinda like one of Obama's foreign policy advisers using a Winnie The Pooh analogy to explain his position. hno:

But tizdoom is a cool cat so go easy on him. Save the ridicule and put downs for some of the other assholes in these parts.

 

[punter]

Unfathomable that the rightys on here will jump to defend the administrations efforts to sweep our war dead under the carpet.

 

[tiznow]

its all a big game punter

we just pawns in the equation

i just try to stay a sharp pawn that's all

so i don't get chewed up in the game

until you grasp that fact and accept it for what it is

your anger will grow

 

[JoeContrarian]

Unfathomable that the rightys on here will jump to defend the administrations efforts to sweep our war dead under the carpet.

Because the Iraqi theater is wise course and in the long term interests of the United States.

Even if 50,000 had died, it would still be necessary and just.

Unfathomable that you and your fellow loons on the left bring nothing to the table except incessant whining and venting.

 

[punter]

It will be an icy day in hell before I ever vote for another fucking Republican.

 

[tiznow]

Because the Iraqi theater is wise course and in the long term interests of the United States.

Even if 50,000 had died, it would still be necessary.

You and your fellow loons on the left are just emoting -- nothing more.

joe just backed up my statement :grandmais

50,000 troop deaths = pawns worth sacrificing for the good of all of us

in their estimation that is

we'll see if they are right d1g1t

 

[NES]

You are right Joe, the truth is way overrated.

 

[Romanowski]

Unfathomable that the rightys on here will jump to defend the administrations efforts to sweep our war dead under the carpet.

I was commenting on the discussion taking place not the original post

war is never pretty. I am justifying IMO the war.

As for hiding dead soldier photographs I cant comment

 

[punter]

joe just backed up my statement :grandmais

50,000 troop deaths = pawns worth sacrificing for the good of all of us

in their estimation that is

we'll see if they are right d1g1t

Yeah he spoke it just like the draft evader that he is.

 

[barman]

It's pretty easy for a guy like Mark L (joeC) to applaud the deaths of soldiers from another country (USA).

 

[barman]

I'll dig up yesterday's article from Florida's largest newspaper about how the US military is obstructing mainstream journalists from photographing US military casualties.

 

[Willie99]

I doubt the families of the deceased want such pictures posted. Show some respect.

I believe this has been a written or unwritten policy for some time now. Don't pretend it's a political issue.

 

[JoeContrarian]

I doubt the families of the deceased want such pictures posted. Show some respect.

I believe this has been a written or unwritten policy for some time now. Don't pretend it's a political issue.

Willie, respect, sacrifice, honor, discipline, decency, humility, strategic thinking, patriotism -- none of these terms are in the far left moonbat lexicon.

The United States military is the most noble, efficient, effective and credible institution in the country.

If there's one agency the government manages extremely well it's the military. The brave and selfless volunteers in the military outperform their counterparts in the private sector in almost every measurable category.

Frankly, the United States military couldn't give two shits what the Soros-barnman far left loons think.

 

[barman]

Good news Mark is that most right thinking Americans don't give two shits what a chickenhawk from Toronto thinks either.

Win Win

 

[barman]

But opponents of the war, civil liberties advocates and journalists argue that the public portrayal of the war is being sanitized and that Americans who choose to do so have the right to see — in whatever medium — the human cost of a war that polls consistently show is unpopular with Americans.

I think that pretty much all of us can agree with this quote from the coverage cited by the OP.

War mongers continue to insist that everything in Iraq and Afghanistan is going swimmingly and that mainstream media is "ignoring the successes", while meanwhile they take umbarage to evidence that American men and women are being slaughtered in the name of BushCo

 

[Willie99]

Bardude, a war never goes swimmingly, stop with the strawman nonsense.

 

[JoeContrarian]

Hate and hysteria....hate and hysteria....hate and hysteria...

This is all the loony left is capable of.

Oh, and let's not forget "hope" and "change" :missingte

I don't think :coke:head barnman has ever posted anything in this forum that ever checked out. Can anyone give just ONE example? His credibility has been snorted away! :nohead:

 

[tiznow]

Hate and hysteria....hate and hysteria....hate and hysteria...

This is all the loony left is capable of.

Oh, and let's not forget "hope" and "change" :missingte

yeah honestly its quite humorous in a dark kinda way

watching the "loony left" duke it out with your version of the "right"

 

[barman]

Bardude, a war never goes swimmingly, stop with the strawman nonsense.

Only responding to what I read and hear from the War Cheerleaders.

Since summer 2003, they've been insisting that the US is just about to wrap this whole affair up and after five years, we're kinda thinking they're full of crap. Hiding the reality of American men and women dead at the altar of BushCo undoubtably helps perpetuate their lies.

 

[alteredegos]

Hate and hysteria....hate and hysteria....hate and hysteria...

This is all the loony left is capable of.

Oh, and let's not forget "hope" and "change" :missingte

I don't think :coke:head barnman has ever posted anything in this forum that ever checked out. Can anyone give just ONE example? His credibility has been snorted away! :nohead:

(1) They attack/marginalize the messengers. (2) They do no real research. (3) They blindly ask 'Where are the 'Primary Sources'?' (4) They projected their own subjective interpretation of a piece of information by using 'semantic manipulation'

NO.1 IN THIS CASE.