Hey mate. Yeah, some big dogs did come through but it was just a completely unpredictable day. No logic at all really.
Karol Beck beating Feliciano Lopez, Vliegen beating Mahut, Granollers beating Andreas Beck, and of course the big one Seppi over Blake, which isn't much of a shock.
Good luck tomorrow mate. May head down to the courts, and boo some of these bastards.
Karol Beck beating Feliciano Lopez, Vliegen beating Mahut, Granollers beating Andreas Beck, and of course the big one Seppi over Blake, which isn't much of a shock.
Good luck tomorrow mate. May head down to the courts, and boo some of these bastards.
Petz picked his game up too much against Ram. Reynolds was rubbish and you were right about Steps, turned Falla into such a bitch that Vaidisova will be jealous.
1-4 (-2.25)
Tennis Record: 130-218-8 (+14.97)
Rubbish day again. 1 win and 12 losses in this round 1. Which I'm proud to say is better than the 1 win and 15 losses I had 2 years ago. That's something eh? :lol:
1-4 (-2.25)
Tennis Record: 130-218-8 (+14.97)
Rubbish day again. 1 win and 12 losses in this round 1. Which I'm proud to say is better than the 1 win and 15 losses I had 2 years ago. That's something eh? :lol:
Cheers mate. Feel the same. I really missed a step not fading Marat and knowing that Kiefer was not 100% fit.
Agree with Cilic, should have too much for Sam.
Adding:
V Spadea o I Andreev @ 3.3 @ BoyleSports (1 unit)
A Montanes o G Canas @ 2.3 @ BoyleSports (1 unit)
J Tipsarevic o M Fish @ 2.3 @ BoyleSports (1 unit)
S Koubek o T Robredo @ 5.5 @ Bet365 (1 unit)
K Vliegen o F Verdasco @ 6.89 @ Pinnacle (1 unit)
Agree with Cilic, should have too much for Sam.
Adding:
V Spadea o I Andreev @ 3.3 @ BoyleSports (1 unit)
A Montanes o G Canas @ 2.3 @ BoyleSports (1 unit)
J Tipsarevic o M Fish @ 2.3 @ BoyleSports (1 unit)
S Koubek o T Robredo @ 5.5 @ Bet365 (1 unit)
K Vliegen o F Verdasco @ 6.89 @ Pinnacle (1 unit)
classicBigweenerguy is a joke account Konun8.
Mikey - Betting dogs in tennis is what I've found to be the most successful strategy in betting, its given me profit two years in a row, and the best bettors I've seen have employed the strategy.
Taking dogs also leads to the logical conclusion that you won't be winning more plays than you lose. Winning percentages only matter in even two way lines like NFL Totals/Handicap betting. That will define your profit because most bets will be made at the -110 and -105 range. Whereas betting dogs does not take into account the range of odds being played. Some dogs have come in at +110, and some at +700. Record means shit in relation to profit when it comes to this strategy.
The thing is all gambling is streaky, I've had times where I've been down 15 units, up 40 all within periods of a month. It's simply called variance. Point is I've ended it with profit. If it doesn't happen this year, then so be it. Maybe then I will take your wonderful and well thought out advice, in spite of the success I've seen or had.
Mikey - Betting dogs in tennis is what I've found to be the most successful strategy in betting, its given me profit two years in a row, and the best bettors I've seen have employed the strategy.
Taking dogs also leads to the logical conclusion that you won't be winning more plays than you lose. Winning percentages only matter in even two way lines like NFL Totals/Handicap betting. That will define your profit because most bets will be made at the -110 and -105 range. Whereas betting dogs does not take into account the range of odds being played. Some dogs have come in at +110, and some at +700. Record means shit in relation to profit when it comes to this strategy.
The thing is all gambling is streaky, I've had times where I've been down 15 units, up 40 all within periods of a month. It's simply called variance. Point is I've ended it with profit. If it doesn't happen this year, then so be it. Maybe then I will take your wonderful and well thought out advice, in spite of the success I've seen or had.
