You Canadians. I'm interested in your opinion.

Search

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,554
Tokens
Hell for every team one of the us states can support, one Canadian city can support three.
Some of the us states are a joke as far as supporting their NHL clubs.

:>(

Winnipeg def couldnt support the Jets. Dont forget, Edmonton, Vancouver and Ottawa have also had all kinds of financial troubles in the past 10 years. Just because it's in Canada means it some kind of guarantee.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
6,478
Tokens
Winnepeg and Quebec left for completely different reasons. Nobody's questioning weather a few areas Of Ontario couldn't support a team now. But there a ton of politics that's gonna probably keep them from achieving that. 90% of Canada wants another team, but the 10% are holding all the right cards at the present time. By opening up his books, Bettman could have just possibly...[with all the current outcry especially] put himself in a position that's gonna work against him in this case. But when it's all said and done i think Bettman will win and an area of Ontario, starving for another team, will have to wait even longer. Unfortunately.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,554
Tokens
Winnepeg and Quebec left for completely different reasons. Nobody's questioning weather a few areas Of Ontario couldn't support a team now. But there a ton of politics that's gonna probably keep them from achieving that. 90% of Canada wants another team, but the 10% are holding all the right cards at the present time. By opening up his books, Bettman could have just possibly...[with all the current outcry especially] put himself in a position that's gonna work against him in this case. But when it's all said and done i think Bettman will win and an area of Ontario, starving for another team, will have to wait even longer. Unfortunately.

I wasnt disputing that Hamilton could support an NHL team, just countering ivan's argument that just because it's Canada, the franchsie will be a success.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
6,478
Tokens
One thing I don't really understand is why Canadians in general are mad at Bettman for the salary cap and the work stoppage. THAT....was inevitable under ANY commissioner and prolly kept a couple more Canadian teams from leaving. Another thing I don't think is fair is them blaming Bettman for the teams that are struggling today. If our country's financial situation wasn't in the shitter, we wouldn't have 90% of the teams struggling today. This is a nice scapegoat for the cause. Which is bringing more hockey in Canada. When things were good, a few of the Canadian teams struggled. Winnepeg, Quebec, Edmonton, Calgary and even Vancouver attendancewise. With the help of Bettman, Calgary and Edmonton got back on their feet and seem to be doing well now. In fact i think ALL the Canadian teams are doing well. I know some, or a lot of it, has to do with the Canadian dollar surging like it did. But I don't know enough about that aspect of things to understand a lot of it. I know the Canadian dollar is going back down and things arn't all rosey like they once were there. But the economy being down here has really hurt our borderline teams. I also know if the management in place in Phoenix, from top to bottom, [owner..all the way down to their coach], did a better job, they wouldn't be in this situation today either. You can't NOT make the playoffs that many years in their history and still survive. Especially down there in the desert. Playoff money is where teams recoup a lot of their losses. On that note, Edmonton still can't be a financially healthy franchise. Kevin Lowe obviously has some picture of some people in come very compromising positions for him to still be running that franchise. He wouldn't have lasted 2 seasons in Detroit with those results. He didn't do well in his position and he just promoted himself to team president. Fixed that little problem. How he's running ANY program still, I'll never know.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2003
Messages
42,910
Tokens
Group says it has $900M lined up to add second team in Toronto
June 5, 2009
CBSSports.com wire reports



TORONTO -- A Toronto-based group has come forward with a proposal to launch a second NHL franchise in the city in time for the 2012-13 season.

The Toronto Legacy Group suggested during a news conference on Friday that about $900 million in financing is already in place for the proposed expansion team, which would play in the same city as the Toronto Maple Leafs, an original NHL franchise.

The team would be known as the Toronto Legacy and play out of a 30,000-seat arena proposed for Downsview Park.

The group led by Andrew Lopez has proposed that 25 percent of its annual net profits would be divided among charitable foundations and nonprofit organizations.

Lopez says his group is not affiliated with Blackberry billionaire Jim Balsillie, who is looking to relocate the Phoenix Coyotes to Hamilton, Ontario.

Copyright 2009 by STATS LLC and The Associated Press. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of STATS LLC and The Associated Press is strictly prohibited.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
6,478
Tokens
He might win while he's still in power. But when does his contract end?

X-files, those owners love him. He's not going ANYWHERE. He implemented the salary cap and put a stop to 50% of their losses. And I don't know this for a fact but they prolly need a 2/3's vote to remove him. You better wish some poor health on him as that's prolly the quickest way he'd ever leave. And he's got some grief right now, but once he settles this he won't have to deal much with Canada like he has and he can stay in his comfy digs in NYC forever.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2003
Messages
42,910
Tokens
BUSHAYS ORIGINAL ARTICLE

:

Things to Consider Before Moving a 2nd Team to Toronto

Photo by: Horge
This summer is shaping up to be pretty good if you’re into all facets of hockey news. We have the Phoenix Coyotes debacle, rumors swirling around the Florida Panthers, a possible return of puck to Winnipeg, a sick corps of players to consider in the entry draft and an interesting list of free agents to tend to before the month of July.

Oh, and this business of putting a 2nd NHL team is Toronto is gaining momentum as well.

Am I the only person that thinks this is one of the most absurd ideas associated with hockey and the NHL in recent years? 2 professional hockey teams in 1 city? Seriously? Let’s consider some things before we pull the trigger on this one, gentleman.

First and foremost, were not just talking about any city and any NHL franchise here. We’re talking about the Toronto Maple Leafs. THE LEAFS. 90+ years of tradition for a team that is a cornerstone in the sport of hockey. Their fans are some of the best in the hockey world with never-ending loyalty and devotion to their team. Through thick and thin; triumph and torment; you will never see a Leaf fan denounce their club.


Logo by: Toronto LegacyNow, do parties interested in putting a 2nd team in Toronto really believe that there will be support for another team within the city? Can you legitimately ask a lifelong Toronto Maple Leaf fan to consider rooting for another team, especially one within their own hometown? My immediate answer is no! Absolutely not! These fans are lifers, plain and simple.

I have heard arguments that fans not fortunate enough to obtain season tickets for the club will look to this new team as an outlet. Listen. Fans not lucky enough to see the Maple Leafs play live will enjoy the game at a local pub or in the comfort of their own home. Essentially, this argument would make the 2nd Toronto franchise a fall back for people who can’t enjoy the benefits of seeing the Maple Leafs live. If that’s the case, it sounds like a 2nd Toronto team would be nothing more than bandwagon and casual fans looking for their hockey fix on nights when they can’t enjoy their favorite club. Not a very stable fan base if you ask me.

Furthermore, where does this leave the Toronto Marlies? The AHL struggles to fill seats night in and night out in most cities and Toronto is no exception. In the 2008-2009 AHL season, Toronto finished 4th worst in the league in league in average attendance clocking in at just a shade under 4,000 people per game. If a 2nd NHL team comes to Toronto, you can kiss the Marlies goodbye. Attendance would surely plummet and scheduling would become of the utmost difficulty. Imagine having the Leafs, Legacy (yeah, in case you didn’t catch it through the media hype, the proposed name for the new franchise in Toronto would be the Legacy) and Marlies all in town on the same night? Who suffers the most in that picture?


Logo by: 3604069 (Yousuf Karsh)Let’s talk about location. The proposed location of the new 30,000 seat arena for the Legacy is in Downsview Park, a mere 19 kilometers (about 12 miles) from the Air Canada Centre. It’s also about 19 kilometers from the Ricoh Coliseum, where the Marlies play. The proximity of the teams just doesn’t make sense. What do you do with 2 major event arenas in the off-season? Is it really a money maker, or will a 2nd arena essentially be a money pit? You can only put so many concerts and circuses in these arenas at a time.

I can just hear the arguments now: “But the Rangers, Islanders and Devils are all close in proximity to one another, and they are doing just fine.” True, but they are completely different fans in completely different areas. Go ahead, call someone from Long Island from New York city or vice versa. You’ll get punched right in the face. They may be close in proximity, but they are distinctly different situations with a distinctly different following. There isn’t that feeling in Toronto. Something is telling me that Leafs fans aren’t torn between supporting the team there now and a perspective team that could be there within the next 5 years. There is no rivaly between Leafs fans, so why create one? Their rivalries lay with Buffalo, Montreal and Ottawa.

Not for nothing, but it’s better to get these things out in the open before this whole project really starts to pick up speed. A second team in Toronto has #FAIL written all over it. Save yourself the time and money and invest elsewhere.

Toronto Legacy

schrembs@saucerpass.com
twitter: @saucerpass
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2002
Messages
24,349
Tokens
X-files, those owners love him. He's not going ANYWHERE. He implemented the salary cap and put a stop to 50% of their losses. And I don't know this for a fact but they prolly need a 2/3's vote to remove him. You better wish some poor health on him as that's prolly the quickest way he'd ever leave. And he's got some grief right now, but once he settles this he won't have to deal much with Canada like he has and he can stay in his comfy digs in NYC forever.

Heaven can take any of us any time, of course, even young 23 year old
studs in the olympics. Does anyone have info on when Bettpussyman's
contract expires? I can still hope for his "retirement", can't i?

:grandmais
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
6,478
Tokens
Savant, i'm just a guy posting a lot of opinions here in this forum but, I think this team has less a chance of success than Basillie's group. And by a longshot. What makes these guys think the league is even thinking about expansion????? Besides, Kansas City has a brand new arena all ready to go and Vegas has been the first city mentioned for years if they expanded. They could put up an arena in 4-6 months out there. And they've[ Jerry Bruckenmeiers[sp] got that much money and more to back a team there. Hey, I think another team in Ontario would be GREAT. Honest I do. But unfortunately, unless they find some loopholes in Bettmans paperwork, it's not gonna happen. Especially since the Leafs [and the Sabres] would be so adamantly against it. I read somewhere where an exhibition game already took place years ago, not sure of the venue.....and they paid the Leafs $150G just to allow the game to take place. So a president has already been established.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
6,478
Tokens
Heaven can take any of us any time, of course, even young 23 year old
studs in the olympics. Does anyone have info on when Bettpussyman's
contract expires? I can still hope for his "retirement", can't i?

:grandmais

Shit. That little fucker is living a dream right now. In his own little world.

Hey, Chelios threatened his life one time didn't he. He's retiring soon. maybe he'll need a side job.@)
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
6,478
Tokens
BUSHAYS ORIGINAL ARTICLE

:

Things to Consider Before Moving a 2nd Team to Toronto

Photo by: Horge
This summer is shaping up to be pretty good if you’re into all facets of hockey news. We have the Phoenix Coyotes debacle, rumors swirling around the Florida Panthers, a possible return of puck to Winnipeg, a sick corps of players to consider in the entry draft and an interesting list of free agents to tend to before the month of July.

Oh, and this business of putting a 2nd NHL team is Toronto is gaining momentum as well.

Am I the only person that thinks this is one of the most absurd ideas associated with hockey and the NHL in recent years? 2 professional hockey teams in 1 city? Seriously? Let’s consider some things before we pull the trigger on this one, gentleman.

First and foremost, were not just talking about any city and any NHL franchise here. We’re talking about the Toronto Maple Leafs. THE LEAFS. 90+ years of tradition for a team that is a cornerstone in the sport of hockey. Their fans are some of the best in the hockey world with never-ending loyalty and devotion to their team. Through thick and thin; triumph and torment; you will never see a Leaf fan denounce their club.


Logo by: Toronto LegacyNow, do parties interested in putting a 2nd team in Toronto really believe that there will be support for another team within the city? Can you legitimately ask a lifelong Toronto Maple Leaf fan to consider rooting for another team, especially one within their own hometown? My immediate answer is no! Absolutely not! These fans are lifers, plain and simple.

I have heard arguments that fans not fortunate enough to obtain season tickets for the club will look to this new team as an outlet. Listen. Fans not lucky enough to see the Maple Leafs play live will enjoy the game at a local pub or in the comfort of their own home. Essentially, this argument would make the 2nd Toronto franchise a fall back for people who can’t enjoy the benefits of seeing the Maple Leafs live. If that’s the case, it sounds like a 2nd Toronto team would be nothing more than bandwagon and casual fans looking for their hockey fix on nights when they can’t enjoy their favorite club. Not a very stable fan base if you ask me.

Furthermore, where does this leave the Toronto Marlies? The AHL struggles to fill seats night in and night out in most cities and Toronto is no exception. In the 2008-2009 AHL season, Toronto finished 4th worst in the league in league in average attendance clocking in at just a shade under 4,000 people per game. If a 2nd NHL team comes to Toronto, you can kiss the Marlies goodbye. Attendance would surely plummet and scheduling would become of the utmost difficulty. Imagine having the Leafs, Legacy (yeah, in case you didn’t catch it through the media hype, the proposed name for the new franchise in Toronto would be the Legacy) and Marlies all in town on the same night? Who suffers the most in that picture?


Logo by: 3604069 (Yousuf Karsh)Let’s talk about location. The proposed location of the new 30,000 seat arena for the Legacy is in Downsview Park, a mere 19 kilometers (about 12 miles) from the Air Canada Centre. It’s also about 19 kilometers from the Ricoh Coliseum, where the Marlies play. The proximity of the teams just doesn’t make sense. What do you do with 2 major event arenas in the off-season? Is it really a money maker, or will a 2nd arena essentially be a money pit? You can only put so many concerts and circuses in these arenas at a time.

I can just hear the arguments now: “But the Rangers, Islanders and Devils are all close in proximity to one another, and they are doing just fine.” True, but they are completely different fans in completely different areas. Go ahead, call someone from Long Island from New York city or vice versa. You’ll get punched right in the face. They may be close in proximity, but they are distinctly different situations with a distinctly different following. There isn’t that feeling in Toronto. Something is telling me that Leafs fans aren’t torn between supporting the team there now and a perspective team that could be there within the next 5 years. There is no rivaly between Leafs fans, so why create one? Their rivalries lay with Buffalo, Montreal and Ottawa.

Not for nothing, but it’s better to get these things out in the open before this whole project really starts to pick up speed. A second team in Toronto has #FAIL written all over it. Save yourself the time and money and invest elsewhere.

Toronto Legacy

schrembs@saucerpass.com
twitter: @saucerpass


You have to give this writer some credit. I bet he thought of this shit and with all of these guys high priced lawyers I bet a lot of it never crossed their minds.
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2002
Messages
24,349
Tokens
Shit. That little fucker is living a dream right now. In his own little world.

Hey, Chelios threatened his life one time didn't he. He's retiring soon. maybe he'll need a side job.@)

I think Chelios will soon turn traitor, like Bowman did, and recieve
an offer from the Black Hawks. But, at least, he has an excuse,
since he played most of his career there.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
6,478
Tokens
Oh I'm a huge Bowman fan and don't consider him a traitor. He's getting close to 80 I think, and wanted to spend some time with his son, who's sick with cancer. And I don't believe Illitch or any of the RW brass feel that way either. I think that's a bad rap you just game him. To me, next to Jacques Demers, no one was more important to the RW success than Scotty. If we can't handle things from here on out with him out of the picture, that'd be pretty sad.
 

New member
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
2,510
Tokens
Savant, i'm just a guy posting a lot of opinions here in this forum but, I think this team has less a chance of success than Basillie's group. And by a longshot. What makes these guys think the league is even thinking about expansion????? Besides, Kansas City has a brand new arena all ready to go and Vegas has been the first city mentioned for years if they expanded. They could put up an arena in 4-6 months out there. And they've[ Jerry Bruckenmeiers[sp] got that much money and more to back a team there. Hey, I think another team in Ontario would be GREAT. Honest I do. But unfortunately, unless they find some loopholes in Bettmans paperwork, it's not gonna happen. Especially since the Leafs [and the Sabres] would be so adamantly against it. I read somewhere where an exhibition game already took place years ago, not sure of the venue.....and they paid the Leafs $150G just to allow the game to take place. So a president has already been established.

I can see Vegas already. Every night... 18,000+ in ticket sales. Every night... 3000 people in the arena. Lowest merchandise revenue in the league. They somehow get to the finals, and none of the casinos will put the game on the big screen due to a compelling MLB matchup.
 

Don't assume people in charge know what they are d
Joined
Aug 16, 2006
Messages
6,479
Tokens
Greater Toronto has 5.5 Million people and is one of the fastest growing cities in N.A.
It IS the most hockey crazy town. Pucks rule.

Two teams is definately viable but IMHO the location is crucial.
Some distance to "split the town" to create some rivalry.

Put teams were people live for hockey, not where you hope they will aquire an interest.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
6,478
Tokens
Put teams were people live for hockey, not where you hope they will aquire an interest.


Yeah! Just who was that idiot that put teams in Winnipeg and Quebec?

What a bonehead move THAT was.
 

Banned
Joined
May 26, 2009
Messages
311
Tokens
The only thing I disagree with is the guy stating that the Leafs have a rivalry with Buffalo. I don't see that, and I live between Toronto and Buffalo.
Sure, you get a lot of Leaf fans at the games in Buffalo. But that's only because it'e relatively easy to get Sabres' tickets, and it's only a 90 minute drive.
If you put a team in Hamilton, you create an instant rivalry. Think Argos vs Ticats.

Putting a team in Hamilton would be a huge hit for the Buffalo Sabres

Buffalo gets a lot of canadian fans from the Niagara Region. People from Niagara Falls, ST Catharines, Welland, Stoney Creek, Thorld...They support the Sabres and attend games

These people would all become Hamilton fans...and attend hamilton games if the ticket prices are the same

It would hurt the sabres a little bit for sure
 

Don't assume people in charge know what they are d
Joined
Aug 16, 2006
Messages
6,479
Tokens
Yeah! Just who was that idiot that put teams in Winnipeg and Quebec?

What a bonehead move THAT was.

You do need population.
Winnipeg and Quebec are piss ant towns from a population standpoint.
Both at about 700,000 by todays census. Back then.....................??
Not viable at any time.
Demographics are very important when allocating a team.

HogTown is viable, if done right.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,810
Messages
13,573,528
Members
100,877
Latest member
kiemt5385
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com