<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by WildBill:
Seems certain that yet again a relative unknown is going to win this. Only a couple of past champs left and surprisingly few "names" left either...<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
It does not seem surprising to me.
If the above happens then will "dead money" still be considered such since "dead money" would have won 3 years in a row?
SOME of the pros just don't get it. They play a game in a tournament that on any given day requires a decent amount of luck to win. Oh btw, you cannot bluff or use 100-200/high limit game strategies on a player who is used to playing 2-4 online and in home games.
With that said, the pros will do fine in the tournaments over time but the variance is large. They just need to play enough of them. The real question is will they live long enough to play enough WSOP 10k tourneys to earn enough cash to make up for all the entry fees paid to play?
Seems certain that yet again a relative unknown is going to win this. Only a couple of past champs left and surprisingly few "names" left either...<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
It does not seem surprising to me.
If the above happens then will "dead money" still be considered such since "dead money" would have won 3 years in a row?
SOME of the pros just don't get it. They play a game in a tournament that on any given day requires a decent amount of luck to win. Oh btw, you cannot bluff or use 100-200/high limit game strategies on a player who is used to playing 2-4 online and in home games.
With that said, the pros will do fine in the tournaments over time but the variance is large. They just need to play enough of them. The real question is will they live long enough to play enough WSOP 10k tourneys to earn enough cash to make up for all the entry fees paid to play?
