I think the opposite....It fattens by bank roll more then not.
We had 1 big line movement play in the playoffs thus far.
That was Game 1 between the Blue Jays and Rangers......The Rangers went from -145 to -111.
Blue Jays won that game 10-1
I always ask myself why would the line drop?
Why not keep Bumgarner at -132....The guy is a playoff stud.
My way of thinking is....Big money knocks a line down 30 cents.
We`ll see how it goes.
Good luck!
Except the Sox and Dodgers getting late moneybig money loses more than you think. Get em tmrw, nice hit on Indians and TT over
if you dont know why the line drops, you are chasing blind steam and that was really early steam. The money that matters is the stuff bet close to first pitch/kickoff.
I'm a chicago fan, but I don't think they are overated, they had more injuries then you think Rondon and Strop were injured for awhile as well as Lacky, They are stronger then last year so I think they have a great shot!
Except the Sox and Dodgers getting late money
I agree with the first part, but you said "the money that matters" is the stuff coming in late. Just pointing out that all three faves got late money, and 2/3 lostcorrect. Emphasizing my point that chasing blind steam is really bad for your pocket. Even when late before first pitch.
I've had some years where I've been privy to what I'd consider the best syndicates around. And I lost more money trying to play their stuff than my own or following Rx guys.
I agree with the first part, but you said "the money that matters" is the stuff coming in late. Just pointing out that all three faves got late money, and 2/3 lost
It's a somewhat interesting discussion, and quite different from reading endless posts from dart-throwers here, but I think it really just boils down to faves typically taking that last rush of action. I wouldn't characterize it as smart money per se. I see this with hockey a lot as well. Those are really the only two sports I ML bet with.