I would agree with some of your post but these groups you mentioned, minorities, uneducated (especially), and the poor's lives were not improving before. Unfortunately the structure is broken down, the republican party comes off as pushing these groups away.
As for education, I think the structure of education has been broken down for a long period of time. I don't know about the rest of the country but I do not understand some of the programs going on here. They are teaching Spanish to 2nd and 3rd graders here? WTF for? Stupid.
you don't know GTC very well, do you?
another POS frequently banned in the man forum for his unique brand of ignorance
and I'm pretty sure HC was a lock in 2008 as well
Um, no it isn't
http://www.ropercenter.uconn.edu/elections/how_groups_voted/voted_12.html
You might want to get your facts straight before spewing your dumb racist bullshit.
totally disagree
both parties have been written off on numerous occasions, and all such predictions have been proven to be categorically incorrect
2010 showed just how strong the GOP vote can be, looks like 2014 may be a repeat of 2010.
as for 2016, can the democratic party count on another historic and lopsided turnout of the inner-city poor? as well as an unenthusiastic turnout of the republican base?
do you think the educated and ethical and working Americans are going to vote for the same ole same ole after the last 6 years?
Bush 41 was unbeatable 18 months out, and lost. How did Gore lose after the late 1990's? Even Carter had a large lead 2 years out as well as much closer to the election
PS: a man's ignorance does diminish his opinion in my world, and where were all those women in 2008?
72 percent white electorate and obama still won off a weak economy vs a white male. your link further illustrates my point of why hillary would win. the white electorate will be around 65 percent in 2016 as the minority groups continue to increase while the aging white population continues to die off. those dead whites arnt being replaced with minorities, what has the gop done to move them over? nothing.
the only chance the gop has to win is to nominate a female or a minority. have no chance vs hillary outside of a minority or female. the only white male who could challenge hillary is christie, but he's not even really a republican. he's one guy who has proven he can get minority votes. outside of that, rubio is probably the best bet, but he'll have to get on the amnesty bandwagon real quick to have any shot with hispanics.
bleeding purple, willie99 is the same clown i won money off on 08. he actually thought mccain would win vs obama, free money for me. he doesnt understand identity politics. he doesnt understand that the white electorate is shrinking election to election and that an empty void is being created because of that dying demo because repubs have done nothing to bring minorities over to fill that gap.
the gap will continue to grow over time. the only republicans who seem to notice that are rand paul and jeb bush.
the gap will continue to grow over time. the only republicans who seem to notice that are rand paul and jeb bush.
those white people are all dead. the real producers are mainly foreigners now. why do you think zuckerbeg is pushing so hard for amnesty? the technical jobs are out there but americans don't have the skills to compete for those jobs. the main sector here for employment is the service industry. look at the cirriculum these asian kids go through and compare it with what you see here.
They're not giving amnesty to Asians, they want amnesty for these guys (and the ghetto culture they bring with them):
And what exactly does "reaching out to minorities" mean? You think Republicans should start playing identity politics like Democrats?
Let's call a spade a spade - the voting blocks you argue the GOP needs to "win elections" don't want more freedom, they want more govt.
Glad you mentioned Zuckerberg. He renounced his US citizenship because of America's 'progressive' (regressive) tax policy, which is only going to get more tyrannical as "minorities" become the majority.
I rest my case.
They're not giving amnesty to Asians, they want amnesty for these guys (and the ghetto culture they bring with them):
And what exactly does "reaching out to minorities" mean? You think Republicans should start playing identity politics like Democrats?
Let's call a spade a spade - the voting blocks you argue the GOP needs to "win elections" don't want more freedom, they want more govt.
Glad you mentioned Zuckerberg. He renounced his US citizenship because of America's 'progressive' (regressive) tax policy, which is only going to get more tyrannical as "minorities" become the majority.
I rest my case.
what is the difference between those guys and lazy white guys or black guys laying down on the job and milking the clock. reaching out to minorities means do what rand paul does and go to a black college and explain why your way is the best instead of just completely ignoring minorities altogether. rand paul and jeb bush are the only white male republicans who seem to understand that, the rest are clueless.
zuckerberg didnt renounce his citizenship, saverin did.
Nothing. They all vote Democrat. Amnesty means we'll just have to deal with more parasites. Democrats understand it's a numbers game and the GOP simply doesn't have the numbers. But as the GOP goes, so goes the country.
Would you open a business in the World's New Lowest Common Denominator Empire? Where are the new Zuckerbergs going to come from?
I get that, I do. But do you really think Rand Paul is going to make a dent in these demographics?
Hmmmm...personal responsibility vs Santa Clause.
"Sorry Rand, you're a nice enough guy, but I'm not exactly getting the connection on how getting rid of my govt check is going to improve my life and put food on my table. I'll stick with the Party of Compassion! Your vision is so 1950s...get with the times!"
And please forget Jeb Bush! He's another Big Government Republican that got us into this mess in the first place!
Actually, they both did.
Facebook Billionaire Gives Up Citizenship to Escape Bad American Tax Policy
http://www.forbes.com/sites/danielm...itizenship-to-escape-bad-american-tax-policy/
So where are the new Zuckerbergs going to come from? Hispanics, blacks, Muslims and single women??? face)(*^%
Before Obama: The future's so bright I gotta wear shades!
After Obama: The future's so dark I gotta wear night vision goggles!
thats 1 person, saverin, like i said earlier. zuckerberg himself hasnt renounced citizenship. nowhere online nor in that link you posted says zuckerberg renounced citizenship.
and i think you are playing the stereotypical white conservative male card with the belief that this country will fall apart as the white population decreases.
for example, what have you, a white male done in society to impact great change? the vast majority of whites have done nothing and live mundane and average regular lifes. just because the founders were white doesnt mean you get to inherit there success. you are no more a producer or contributor to society than the average black or latino.
im talking 2016. the link you posted was the 2012 election with 72 percent of the electorate being white. in 08 the electorate was 76 white. may not be 65 in 16, but it will be under 70 for sure. so what has the gop done to fill in that gap of white voters? nothing.
they couldnt even win with optimal number of whites, good luck now with shrinking number of whites.
they need to go through with the amnesty if they want to compete vs hillary in 16.
By all rational observations you would think that is the case.
However recent history has shown that rationality has very little to do with electing presidents.
I have come to understand (although it took awhile) why Obama won in 2008. He was the shiny new toy every kid wanted for Christmas. Then come 2012 and after a disastrous 4 years in office, he got reelected.
I have come to the conclusion that irrational voters outnumber the rational ones.
Which is precisely why I stand by my prediction that Hillary will run and probably win.
It has been proven time and time again, you just can’t fix stupid.
Actually, in 2008, the electorate was 74% white.
http://www.ropercenter.uconn.edu/elections/how_groups_voted/voted_08.html
The GOP has "done nothing" except elect white male Gov's in WI, PA, NJ, Michigan, Maine and Texas (with a huge "hispanic" population).
I'm sure the GOP is totally on the way to extinction. Especially after they take a net of 6 Senate seats this November...
Newsflash: the country IS falling apart as the white population decreases. It's not a race thing, it's a culture and values thing. As 'minorities' increase in numbers, the US is becoming more poor and socialist - FACT.
I wish the "voting blocks" you mentioned were voting for more freedom, but the fact is they aren't. And no amount of "reaching out" will change their attitudes. I understand there are exceptions, but 90% of blacks vote Democrat, ARE YOU KIDDING ME! face)(*^%
Illegals from third world countries aren't crossing the border for more freedom and opportunity, they're crossing so they have access to quality healthcare, education, child care etc.
If you don't want to live in Mexico and South America, why the hell would you import their people, language, values and culture? If you don't want America to look like downtown Detroit and Cleveland, why celebrate when the party that panders to the "inner city" vote wins elections?
"The GOP should get on board with amnesty!"
uppy:
