>>This line should be +2.5 -250<<
A little while ago you said it should
be -600. Looks like you're the one
with the "bad line", no?
>>If I had to make a line on this one at +2.5 for Oakland, I would say about Oak +2.5 -600 approximately<<
For what it's worth, I laid -215 at a very reputable and sharp book and am not worried
one bit about a possible cancellation.
A little while ago you said it should
be -600. Looks like you're the one
with the "bad line", no?
>>If I had to make a line on this one at +2.5 for Oakland, I would say about Oak +2.5 -600 approximately<<
For what it's worth, I laid -215 at a very reputable and sharp book and am not worried
one bit about a possible cancellation.
Well, thank you Greg, I rest my case. You just said you saw some -235 and -240.. And when I saw Benji's post, he had it at -190, and i told him that line was wrong.. Well in that case, why is it now -240? I guess there must have been some merit to what I said because it has moved 50 cents since, and I only posted that about 1.5 hrs ago..
So I was right, that line was way off, or it wouldn't have moved so much.. And like i said, if I had an acct there, I would have banged out that game which would have moved it to -270, easily.. That -190 was an off line.. And I stand by what i said..
So I was right, that line was way off, or it wouldn't have moved so much.. And like i said, if I had an acct there, I would have banged out that game which would have moved it to -270, easily.. That -190 was an off line.. And I stand by what i said..
Maybe the -600 was high, but NO WAY is this a -200... NO WAY.. and you know it too, or it wouldn't have closed at -245 in a lot of places. Hell, that line moved 55 cents in 30 minutes..
Lets see how sharp you are Mr Paddyboy.. This will prove that your -200 is way off..
Would you rather have Oakland to win and get +150 ONLY..
OR
Would you rather lay -190 and have to lose by 3 runs with ZITO pitching at home.. LOL LOL LOL....
Now answer that one, and then come back to me and apologize for mocking me..
And then tell me that I was off on this one.. Of course the -600 was exaggerated.. but -280 to -300 ain't exaggerating..
And another reason why this line is way off. This is not a game with a total of 10.5 or 12.. It is a total of 6.5 and 7's across. So +2.5 here is worth a helluva lot now paddy boy..
If I can have games like this with lines like this everyday of the year, I'd be living out of my mothers basement and living on some island sir..
Lets see how sharp you are Mr Paddyboy.. This will prove that your -200 is way off..
Would you rather have Oakland to win and get +150 ONLY..
OR
Would you rather lay -190 and have to lose by 3 runs with ZITO pitching at home.. LOL LOL LOL....
Now answer that one, and then come back to me and apologize for mocking me..
And then tell me that I was off on this one.. Of course the -600 was exaggerated.. but -280 to -300 ain't exaggerating..
And another reason why this line is way off. This is not a game with a total of 10.5 or 12.. It is a total of 6.5 and 7's across. So +2.5 here is worth a helluva lot now paddy boy..
If I can have games like this with lines like this everyday of the year, I'd be living out of my mothers basement and living on some island sir..
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by sick gambler:
Lets see how sharp you are Mr Paddyboy.. This will prove that your -200 is way off..
Would you rather have Oakland to win and get +150 ONLY..
OR
Would you rather lay -190 and have to lose by 3 runs with ZITO pitching at home.. LOL LOL LOL....
Now answer that one, and then come back to me and apologize for mocking me..
And then tell me that I was off on this one.. Of course the -600 was exaggerated.. but -280 to -300 ain't exaggerating..
And another reason why this line is way off. This is not a game with a total of 10.5 or 12.. It is a total of 6.5 and 7's across. So +2.5 here is worth a helluva lot now paddy boy..
If I can have games like this with lines like this everyday of the year, I'd be living out of my mothers basement and living on some island sir..<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
________
Patty boy, you never answered this question.. Now i am not even going to comment about this game winning, because that wasn't the issue here. Who cares it won, it is TOTALLY irrelevant..It's only 1 damn game, anything could have happened. But.... answer this question please..
Would you rather have Oakland +150 and have to win outright, OR... Oakland laying -200 and having to lose by 3... and in a game where the total is 6.5?? LOL, like this game here. Now tell me this -200 is the right price.. LOL LOL.. Now had this total been 11.5, i can see where you are coming from, or even a total of 9.5.. But a 6.5 total and you have to lose by 3 runs and ONLY lay 200.. paleeeeeeeeease.. Come on Patty, admit that line was way off now..
I would make that bet with you on every game next year at +2.5 -200 on every game that is a 6.5 total and a +150 home dog getting +2.5 runs, and I would do very very well..
Don't you agree Patty boy..
Lets see how sharp you are Mr Paddyboy.. This will prove that your -200 is way off..
Would you rather have Oakland to win and get +150 ONLY..
OR
Would you rather lay -190 and have to lose by 3 runs with ZITO pitching at home.. LOL LOL LOL....
Now answer that one, and then come back to me and apologize for mocking me..
And then tell me that I was off on this one.. Of course the -600 was exaggerated.. but -280 to -300 ain't exaggerating..
And another reason why this line is way off. This is not a game with a total of 10.5 or 12.. It is a total of 6.5 and 7's across. So +2.5 here is worth a helluva lot now paddy boy..
If I can have games like this with lines like this everyday of the year, I'd be living out of my mothers basement and living on some island sir..<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
________
Patty boy, you never answered this question.. Now i am not even going to comment about this game winning, because that wasn't the issue here. Who cares it won, it is TOTALLY irrelevant..It's only 1 damn game, anything could have happened. But.... answer this question please..
Would you rather have Oakland +150 and have to win outright, OR... Oakland laying -200 and having to lose by 3... and in a game where the total is 6.5?? LOL, like this game here. Now tell me this -200 is the right price.. LOL LOL.. Now had this total been 11.5, i can see where you are coming from, or even a total of 9.5.. But a 6.5 total and you have to lose by 3 runs and ONLY lay 200.. paleeeeeeeeease.. Come on Patty, admit that line was way off now..
I would make that bet with you on every game next year at +2.5 -200 on every game that is a 6.5 total and a +150 home dog getting +2.5 runs, and I would do very very well..
Don't you agree Patty boy..
