you guy's are all a joke . Who's to blame, yes the management team. But guess what, it was the shrink and all his shills in here that said it was like an all star team putting toghether Panam. I love it that this forum never takes responsibility for sending its readers to the dog's. Oh yea shrink, where is the 500k bond?
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by SunDevil:
General, I fear I already know the answer to this, but can you tell us if this $500K bond actually exists and, if so, anything about its purpose?
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
I cannot promise that there is a $1 posted Bond. I am sorry. Panam said they would address this.
General, I fear I already know the answer to this, but can you tell us if this $500K bond actually exists and, if so, anything about its purpose?
I cannot promise that there is a $1 posted Bond. I am sorry. Panam said they would address this.
Doesnt this thread remind you of the commercial on right now
"LEON CANT DO EVERYTHING!!!!!" Insert SHIRNK in the previous quote! The responsibility rests SOLELY on my supporting cast!!!!
Oh my GOD, i just noticed that the SHRINK answered me directly in a post! I am important now, can i get an autograph sir!
First time that Shrink answers a post by me in about 6 months!
"LEON CANT DO EVERYTHING!!!!!" Insert SHIRNK in the previous quote! The responsibility rests SOLELY on my supporting cast!!!!
Oh my GOD, i just noticed that the SHRINK answered me directly in a post! I am important now, can i get an autograph sir!
First time that Shrink answers a post by me in about 6 months!
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>When a business fails, I believe ownership is responsible...
And when that happens, it is usually due to poor management, in general...
THE SHRINK<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
One out of two ain't bad Shrinkie, lack of capital dooms over 75% of all new businesses in the USA so I have to believe it is closer to 100% in third world countries.
money is very cheap now though, it does not speak well of the principles if they cannot find additional financing, in a generic sense. I have no clue abt PanAm or really care too.
Guaranteed though no matter what, you will not be finding the 100% truth anywhere in public anytime soon if ever. You will be subjected to enough spinning to weave a quilt.
And when that happens, it is usually due to poor management, in general...
THE SHRINK<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
One out of two ain't bad Shrinkie, lack of capital dooms over 75% of all new businesses in the USA so I have to believe it is closer to 100% in third world countries.
money is very cheap now though, it does not speak well of the principles if they cannot find additional financing, in a generic sense. I have no clue abt PanAm or really care too.
Guaranteed though no matter what, you will not be finding the 100% truth anywhere in public anytime soon if ever. You will be subjected to enough spinning to weave a quilt.
As I was fortunate enough NOT to have any money with BetPanAm, I have not paid too close attention to those threads.
However, I have some questions:
1) What negative posts have been made about them (that could have been considered warning signs)?
2) What (if any) rebuttal did the RX give in defense of BetPamAm in those instances?
3) Did the RX suppress any negative threads about BetPanAm that are prophetically relevant to the current situation?
It's one thing that Shrink may have over-hyped this young book. It would be quite another if he turned a blind-eye and deaf-ear to legitimate complaints. Has/could anyone research some background on BetPanAm past problems that RX defended?
However, I have some questions:
1) What negative posts have been made about them (that could have been considered warning signs)?
2) What (if any) rebuttal did the RX give in defense of BetPamAm in those instances?
3) Did the RX suppress any negative threads about BetPanAm that are prophetically relevant to the current situation?
It's one thing that Shrink may have over-hyped this young book. It would be quite another if he turned a blind-eye and deaf-ear to legitimate complaints. Has/could anyone research some background on BetPanAm past problems that RX defended?
