who does everyone have playing for the nat'l champ. and why?

[n19dlo]

The winner of Ohio State and USC beating Florida.

Bingo although the Big XII looks like the power conference this year. Would not be surprised to see Texas or Okla or Mizz in the title game. :toast:

 

[clowncar]

Wrong how? He just spewed what everybody else knows. I give him some credit for having the hangers (aka balls) to speak his mind.

Bottom Line teams like USC (more so than anyone), OSU, OU, and the rest of the "creme de la creme" get beneficiary calls. Regardless if these calls were applied to this particular game or not his assesment over this issue is correct. This truly is common knowledge.

Good luck

IT is ??

Agree to disagree I suppose. If this were the case wouldn't favorites outperform the line a majority of the time ? History doesn't bear this out.

I will just agree to disagree on the point.

IF it is the case , Mangino picked the most idiotic time to point it out. His team just lost on a questionable call late in the game, after being the beneficiaries of several horrific calls in that game. He chose that time to address the issue , the one time where he would have the least credibility.


mangino ------:cryingcry

 

[Cappin'Guru]

Ohio State vs. Florida,

Its going to happen again people, with the same outcome. If Ohio State can beat USC then they will definitely have a pretty easy route to the Championship game. As for Florida, Georgia is the team that can give them trouble, and they know it. Luckily they play on a neutral ground. I think its a rematch.

Florida wins it again.

Thats my two cents.

Thanks,

The Guru

 

[sarcean]

USC vs Georgia...the matchup that should of happened last year in the Rose Bowl.

Georgia should be in the NC with one loss (or even two). UF has an "easy" schedule only leaving Florida 3 times the whole season but they are the same team that lost 4 games last season.

I really doubt the voters will allow Ohio State to get back in the nc AGAIN unless there really is no else even half deserving.