hno:
Wow, this dude just can't be serious
The founding fathers of the greatest democracy in the history of mankind thought about everything you do 10.000,000 x over, and this is the process they decided would be most fair. And they're right, because concentration of special interest votes shouldn't carry the day.
Founding fathers >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Large Marge into infinity and beyond. Feel silly just mentioning the whiny little bitch of a man in the same sentence as them
Sorry dude, your providers have to appeal to more demographics than residents of 15 cities or so that vote for a living
Three points on all this, meant for reasonable people with some intelligence;
1) Trump didn't bother campaigning in states like California which was a brilliant strategy for him. He played to win the game, which is the EC. But that strategy is going to cost you votes when looking at the popular votes.
2) An analogy, in football is it more important to accumulate yards of score TD's?
3) Democrats win large cities with 90% of the vote each and every election despite the candidate despite the issues despite anything. Democrats have managed those largest cities for 50 years and counting, and many if not most of those cities represent the poorest and most crime invested communities in the country. Are those really the people that should decide our presidency every four years? Seriously? Just the 90% support for the same party every year disqualifies them from having such control
PS: Large Marge is an idiot, everyone from both sides of the isle in this forum knows this. Only he doesn't
I agree 100% ...... LARGEMARGE is an idiot cheersgif
Wow, this dude just can't be serious
The founding fathers of the greatest democracy in the history of mankind thought about everything you do 10.000,000 x over, and this is the process they decided would be most fair. And they're right, because concentration of special interest votes shouldn't carry the day.
Founding fathers >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Large Marge into infinity and beyond. Feel silly just mentioning the whiny little bitch of a man in the same sentence as them
Sorry dude, your providers have to appeal to more demographics than residents of 15 cities or so that vote for a living
Three points on all this, meant for reasonable people with some intelligence;
1) Trump didn't bother campaigning in states like California which was a brilliant strategy for him. He played to win the game, which is the EC. But that strategy is going to cost you votes when looking at the popular votes.
2) An analogy, in football is it more important to accumulate yards of score TD's?
3) Democrats win large cities with 90% of the vote each and every election despite the candidate despite the issues despite anything. Democrats have managed those largest cities for 50 years and counting, and many if not most of those cities represent the poorest and most crime invested communities in the country. Are those really the people that should decide our presidency every four years? Seriously? Just the 90% support for the same party every year disqualifies them from having such control
PS: Large Marge is an idiot, everyone from both sides of the isle in this forum knows this. Only he doesn't
