Ill- I do know a little about the JayC experience. I did not know that it was 1084 that he was convicted of. I guess I just figured that he had been convicted of a bookmaking charge. I still however doub that he could have been convicted if he had not accepted bets from people using a wire device (phone or land based internet connection). Not that I feel he should have been convicted in the first place. I give him credit for standing up to the US govt, it is not a easy thing to do!