What U.S. Presidential candidate who lost would have made best POTUS?

Search

Capper Tracker
Joined
Jan 15, 2009
Messages
5,458
Tokens
John Mccain but my belief is if you havnt served you shouldnt be allowed to be President.
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
87,129
Tokens
Fiscal conservatism most important issue to me. That and smaller federal government go hand in hand, and generally speaking that will enable the private sector to prosper growing the economy and creating jobs. Jobs are what society is all about, growing together.

So for me that would be Goldwater & Perot. Ron Paul is also strong on fiscal and social issues, but it's national defense where I strongly disagree with him.

The no nonsense candidate I would like is unelectable in modern day America. Being honest and tough and talking straight to the people will get you crucified by scumbag politicians and their enabling media.

In recent elections, Romney would have been much better than Obama (couldn't possibly be worse) and had the potential to bring about some change, but I don't think he goes as far as I would want him to.

McCain is just the status quo, your typical beltway fog politician far removed from fiscal reality. Although he would have been very good with respect to defense.

Gore, forgetaboutit

Dole, IDK, maybe somewhere between McCain & Romney

Bush 41, maybe the most qualified president of the modern era. Honest, objective, served in the military, headed the CIA , Ambassador at the UN, Envoy to China, Vice President of the USA, president of an Oil Company. Compare that resume to that of most presidents, nothing compares

Dukakis, ? still thinking that had to be a joke

Mondale, another DC fog type of guy, although he was honest enough to tell the people he wanted to increase taxes
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2003
Messages
26,300
Tokens
Bush has always been a 4 letter word for me.....America would not let that happen a third time....
 

Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2005
Messages
2,751
Tokens
Fiscal conservatism most important issue to me. That and smaller federal government go hand in hand, and generally speaking that will enable the private sector to prosper growing the economy and creating jobs. Jobs are what society is all about, growing together.

So for me that would be Goldwater & Perot. Ron Paul is also strong on fiscal and social issues, but it's national defense where I strongly disagree with him.

The no nonsense candidate I would like is unelectable in modern day America. Being honest and tough and talking straight to the people will get you crucified by scumbag politicians and their enabling media.

In recent elections, Romney would have been much better than Obama (couldn't possibly be worse) and had the potential to bring about some change, but I don't think he goes as far as I would want him to.

McCain is just the status quo, your typical beltway fog politician far removed from fiscal reality. Although he would have been very good with respect to defense.

Gore, forgetaboutit

Dole, IDK, maybe somewhere between McCain & Romney

Bush 41, maybe the most qualified president of the modern era. Honest, objective, served in the military, headed the CIA , Ambassador at the UN, Envoy to China, Vice President of the USA, president of an Oil Company. Compare that resume to that of most presidents, nothing compares

Dukakis, ? still thinking that had to be a joke

Mondale, another DC fog type of guy, although he was honest enough to tell the people he wanted to increase taxes

Dukakis!! LOL. Had to be the easiest presidential race to predict of all-time. What were the dems thinking? I agree with you about Bush 41.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,828
Messages
13,573,663
Members
100,877
Latest member
kiemt5385
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com