Well, the Lakers game is on ESPN, so since it is a national TV game, there were live lines on 5dimes. After we lost the 1st quarter, I took the Lakers 2nd quarter -3.5 -115 for more than the 1st Q and that cashed easy as they won the 2nd quarter 36-23. However, this was a rarity because it was a game offering Live betting, but there still were no MLs for the quarter. Happy to get the win, but wish we had more opportunites like what I previously theorized.
Thanks TC for these two WINNERS - looks like they weren't even close.
2-0 tonight (+2 units). 3-0 this week (+5 units) with these .5/1.0 fav (non-ML) 1Q bets.
I was at the LAKER game tonight. I personally enjoyed watching centers Marcin Gortat and Andrew Bynum battle each other in the paint - something you see much better live than on TV.
Tommorow's CLIPPER game will be a game that matches my criteria as they will be 1Q favs at 0.5 or 1.0.
They are currently 3.0 pt game favs at home vs SAN ANTONIO.
Here we go. All the train hoppers have a small bad run and their handkerchiefs are so wet from all the crying. Keep it to yourself who gives a flying f'. Once you make that wager you and only you are responsible for that wager. If you all think you can do better than by all means do it yourself and keep your comments to yourself. If you haven't noticed this is a risk and a huge risk. Anytime you lay over -150 the risk is great. I passed on Phil and Okla just because but did take Mia just because. Using what I have I went 2-2 and lost . The 2 win wagers get 2 wins the 2 lossing wagers get -310 so at 50% win rate you lose 1.1 units. Do you understand I doubt it.
On to business. I don't have spread records so you are on your own. All this talk about if this and if that gets you no where without documented records. Well here it is
His 1st qtr play on teams have gone 124-52-8
If they lost in the 1st qtr then 24-28
and if they lost in the first 2 qtrs the second half is 17-8.
So don't do it.
Yesterday is done on to today with more risk.
On to business. I don't have spread records so you are on your own. All this talk about if this and if that gets you no where without documented records. Well here it is
His 1st qtr play on teams have gone 124-52-8
If they lost in the 1st qtr then 24-28
and if they lost in the first 2 qtrs the second half is 17-8.
So don't do it.
Yesterday is done on to today with more risk.
I won't type all this stuff out so you will get a summary here. Goes like this
home--vis--%hm--%vis
LAC SA 90.9 44.4
CHI NJN 72.7 35.3
MEM GS 58.3 85.7
PORT ATL 41.7 37.5
If the clippers are fav that % is how they have done as a fav and SA as a dog
One could put the whole chart in here years back but the rX fixed something and can no longer do it.
home--vis--%hm--%vis
LAC SA 90.9 44.4
CHI NJN 72.7 35.3
MEM GS 58.3 85.7
PORT ATL 41.7 37.5
If the clippers are fav that % is how they have done as a fav and SA as a dog
One could put the whole chart in here years back but the rX fixed something and can no longer do it.
Just using TC's picks for my own 1Q non-ML bets. Again, my rule is to take his leans on fav 1Q teams when the spread is 0.5 or 1.0
CLIPS -1.0 1Q -105 (4 units)
CLIPS have 90.9% win rate as a ML 1Q fav as CTP nicely charted. SA is 44.4% as 1Q dog.
I was going to bet this one anyway - but now much bigger with some stats back up this one.
CLIPS -1.0 1Q -105 (4 units)
CLIPS have 90.9% win rate as a ML 1Q fav as CTP nicely charted. SA is 44.4% as 1Q dog.
I was going to bet this one anyway - but now much bigger with some stats back up this one.
