mckelvin sucks!!!
10...pays $120
wash+6.5..............win
seattle-7.5............win
under 46.5 chi/gb....win
under 47 buf/ne......mckelvin
20...pays $240
san fran+5.............win
under 46 sf/ari........win
under 46.5 chi/gb....win
under 47 buf/ne......mckelvin
10...pays $800
baltimore-13...........win
jacksonville+6.5.......win
under 45 jax/ind......win
san francisco+5.......win
seattle-7.5.............win
under 41 stl/sea......win
under 47 buf/ne.......mckelvin
now that sucks!!!!
GAME.hno:
Hello TheGame9000, great stats and trends, thanks man...
When I saw that stat you had about the Jets the week before the Pats, it definitely caught my attention... great stat, may I ask where you found a stat like that, it is rare to see an angle like that... thanks man, appreciate it.
NFL P...
all information is mine, not found anywhere. i analyze trends and stats like a religion, been doing it since 1977, "a labor of love".
once in a blue moon i'll lift a stat or trend from someone else if it has stood the test of time and i don't already have it, but i'll ask first.
and the stat you were looking at is only part 1 of the paycheck, part 2 comes up later.
GAME.
NFL P...
all information is mine, not found anywhere. i analyze trends and stats like a religion, been doing it since 1977, "a labor of love".
once in a blue moon i'll lift a stat or trend from someone else if it has stood the test of time and i don't already have it, but i'll ask first.
and the stat you were looking at is only part 1 of the paycheck, part 2 comes up later.
GAME.
Game: I'm a big believer in trends, but when I look at a trend I try to figure out logically what the reason is behind the trend.
I absolutely can't figure out why the Jets have such a good record before playing NE. There is no reason for it.
If anything their record should be bad because they would be looking forward to a conference game with NE.
What's your thoughts on this trend?