Wednesday May 16th

[wannabewhale]

961 Az -112
966 LAD -148
970 Boston -130

 

[HPark1]

956 Philadelphia Phillies -131
968 Cleveland Indians -177
972 Toronto Blue Jays -160

 

[TomorrowsNewspaper]

964 San Diego Padres J Peavy - R -170
970 Boston Red Sox J Tavarez - R -130
973 Texas Rangers V Padilla - R -114

 

[THEPOSTMAN!]

956 Philadelphia -131
954 Pittsburgh -110
966 LA Dodgers -148

:think2:

 

[Puckhandler]

967 Cleveland +166
971 Baltimore +150
962 Colorado +102

 

[FairWarning]

956 Philly -131
961 Arizona -112

 

[sherwood]

963 Cincinnati Reds +1.60
980 Oakland A's -2.05
978 Seattle Mariners +1.25

 

[TomorrowsNewspaper]

967 Cleveland +166
971 Baltimore +150
962 Colorado +102

Cleveland was not 166 in this game. IS that a no play?

 

[CalvinTy]

Cleveland was not 166 in this game. IS that a no play?

FWIW, this was not the first time a poster typed an incorrect value but had everything else correct. It was just a case of something like typing +159 when it should be +154. Something along the lines.

In this case, the rotation number and team name does not match.

If it was a mistake like this:

968 Cleveland Indians -166 (should be -177) then it might be okay even if transposing the opponent's number by mistake.

But something like:

967 Cleveland Indians (wrong)
(how do we know the poster meant to post Minnesota at +166? we can't "tell"?)

IMHO, I am going to guess it would be a no play, too.

* CalvinTy

 

[PublicsMoney]

Any time a poster posts the wrong information it should be deemed a "no play" It is not Sportssavant's responsibility to make sure everyone posts correctly. I would rule it as a no play as well. It is our responsibility to get things right. Nice catch Calvinty.