WE'D LIKE TO WELCOME INTERTOPS TO THERX.COM!!!

[Intruder]

I put $100 in to try, lost $30 in the casino real quick at blackjack. As long as they are solid and pay all is good.

Anyone have any problems?

 

[RPM]

INTRUDER,

they are solid man. no problems. intertops is a GREAT book to use as one of your outs!!~

 

[Buzzsaw]

You know you are both an old timer and a square if you admit I'tops is one of your favorite books.

I like I'tops and have had a funded and active account there for at least 4 years.

I even got use to that silly -1.91 or whatever it is. The customer service is dry but very effective. No flirtting around here for sure.

They lost much of their talent to WWTS a 1/2 a year ago and for a while it showed. But really a fun book that I have long enjoyed.

 

[sfeiner]

red
its been maybe 2 years since ive done it but i have made transfers at intertops before. not sure where to, probably wwts or olympic but they did several for me. they may have changed this policy since then but i'll look into it.

 

[majbrit]

I have been with intertops for years. They are excellent! Welcome.

 

[VG789]

Solid book.
Any chance for higher limits now?

 

[oldmantime]

One thing about this Book is Certain and probably something All books should have.

They are not gamblers, but bookmakers. By having low limits--they would most likely "balance their books", which gives one a feeling that you WILL be paid!

 

[RPM]

good point oldman!~

 

[Ninja]

No, that wasn't a good point by oldmantime.

Limits relate to, and should be set in accordance with, a book's bankroll and the exposure they are willing to take on an event. Limits have very little to do with "balancing the books".

The puny limits set by an established, well-funded book like Intertops relates more to the complete lack of conviction in their numbers, or courage on the part of their linesmaker.

Good bookmakers know that action=juice=profits. Limiting players to a max wager of $55 is not good bookmaking.

 

[RPM]

ninja,

you said "the exposure they are willing to take on an event."

and then "The puny limits set by an established, well-funded book like Intertops relates more to the complete lack of conviction in their numbers, or courage on the part of their linesmaker."


perhaps your first comment was correct. maybe even though they are well established and well funded, they choose to limit their exposure on some things. seems like good business to me.

i would rather play at a shop that limits their exposure than one that is giving the house away.

just my two cents.

 

[Ninja]

My second comment was correct too.

Let me just repeat my last statement again, because I think it sums it up best.

Good bookmakers know that action=juice=profits. Limiting players to a max wager of $55 is not good bookmaking.