Man, I am shocked too. This guy had 6 accts at the same time and circumvented limits on 6 games, and is still getting paid in full. WOW.. Man, this guy makes me look like a saint.. I had NEVER had more than 1 acct at the same time and never circumvented limits and gave the books tons of action.. and I was considered the evil man of the offshore industry..
This kid is my hero. How does he get away with this? He should open up his own school of scammers and how to open up 6 accts at same time, bet the max on each of those games, and still get paid..
Where do I sign up? This kid is really my hero..
This kid is my hero. How does he get away with this? He should open up his own school of scammers and how to open up 6 accts at same time, bet the max on each of those games, and still get paid..
Where do I sign up? This kid is really my hero..
First we have Sick fraud, and now yet ANOTHER one with Iwin. Throw in David *****(VERY well known for all sorts of different scams) for good measure. You people have GOT to be kidding me. Keep Paddying yourself on the back for getting these sleazeballs paid, again and again.
Looks like shrink finally got it right about Royal. Strange how that works. Where is Lander to speak out about this? After all, the f'ing 'knows less than even the genral about offshore issues' wouldn't stop badgering me when I mildly defended Royal in the face of this place dumping them.
hey Lander, as I said before, you're fed what people want you to be fed. Those people know that you will make an ass out of yourself in defense of what you perceive to be the truth. Which once again, is what they feed you.
[This message was edited by The General on September 30, 2003 at 07:55 PM.]
Looks like shrink finally got it right about Royal. Strange how that works. Where is Lander to speak out about this? After all, the f'ing 'knows less than even the genral about offshore issues' wouldn't stop badgering me when I mildly defended Royal in the face of this place dumping them.
hey Lander, as I said before, you're fed what people want you to be fed. Those people know that you will make an ass out of yourself in defense of what you perceive to be the truth. Which once again, is what they feed you.
[This message was edited by The General on September 30, 2003 at 07:55 PM.]
Sue,
Make a search, you will see that I said that this guy should be paid all his monies, minus the bonuses because if all those bets lose, Ewinner does NOT come back and say, we owe you 29 dimes. They booked those bets, they should pay him. They shouldn't come after the games and say we found out you had more than 1 acct, therefore, we are not paying you. They should have found out in the beginning.. Not after 1 or 2 months.
I am just saying that this guy got lucky and did not have his money seized because good ol Royal came into the rescue. If Royal doesn't come in here, it's over for this guy and his 6 names, and his 18k..
Make a search, you will see that I said that this guy should be paid all his monies, minus the bonuses because if all those bets lose, Ewinner does NOT come back and say, we owe you 29 dimes. They booked those bets, they should pay him. They shouldn't come after the games and say we found out you had more than 1 acct, therefore, we are not paying you. They should have found out in the beginning.. Not after 1 or 2 months.
I am just saying that this guy got lucky and did not have his money seized because good ol Royal came into the rescue. If Royal doesn't come in here, it's over for this guy and his 6 names, and his 18k..
Ken has acted as the true gentleman he is throughout this whole issue. Back in July, when he pulled Royal down, we kept constant correspondence . he was honest enough to admit that his money was against Royal .
He has been provided hard evidence of the changes we've made and what was the nature of the issues behind the situation back then.
We truly believe Ken has given Royal Sports the chance of being challenged, enabling us to give a tangible sign to the Industry : Royal Sports is here to stay.
When we discussed this bailout he gave us a chance to have a better knowledge of these players. We happen to disagree with the posters that have called this group "scams". They are sharps, but not "scams". They have all played with Royal in the past and we have not experienced any problem with any of them.
Sportsbooks are free to take or decline the action players give them. We feel that if a book doesn't like a certain kind of action it has the freedom to cap limits or boot the player . Books have the freedom of revoking bonuses. We find it unfair to confiscate a player's money only because he is a sharp or a wiseguy. if that was the case 95% of the posters here would have had their money confiscated everywhere.
GL to all.
Royal Sports
The Book of Kings
1-800-818-1000
He has been provided hard evidence of the changes we've made and what was the nature of the issues behind the situation back then.
We truly believe Ken has given Royal Sports the chance of being challenged, enabling us to give a tangible sign to the Industry : Royal Sports is here to stay.
When we discussed this bailout he gave us a chance to have a better knowledge of these players. We happen to disagree with the posters that have called this group "scams". They are sharps, but not "scams". They have all played with Royal in the past and we have not experienced any problem with any of them.
Sportsbooks are free to take or decline the action players give them. We feel that if a book doesn't like a certain kind of action it has the freedom to cap limits or boot the player . Books have the freedom of revoking bonuses. We find it unfair to confiscate a player's money only because he is a sharp or a wiseguy. if that was the case 95% of the posters here would have had their money confiscated everywhere.
GL to all.
Royal Sports
The Book of Kings
1-800-818-1000
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Royal Sports:
Ken has acted as the true gentleman he is throughout this whole issue. Back in July, when he pulled Royal down, we kept constant correspondence . he was honest enough to admit that his money was against Royal .
He has been provided hard evidence of the changes we've made and what was the nature of the issues behind the situation back then.
We truly believe Ken has given Royal Sports the chance of being challenged, enabling us to give a tangible sign to the Industry : Royal Sports is here to stay.
When we discussed this bailout he gave us a chance to have a better knowledge of these players. We happen to disagree with the posters that have called this group "scams". They are sharps, but not "scams". They have all played with Royal in the past and we have not experienced any problem with any of them.
Sportsbooks are free to take or decline the action players give them. We feel that if a book doesn't like a certain kind of action it has the freedom to cap limits or boot the player . Books have the freedom of revoking bonuses. We find it unfair to confiscate a player's money only because he is a sharp or a wiseguy. if that was the case 95% of the posters here would have had their money confiscated everywhere.
GL to all.
Royal Sports
The Book of Kings
1-800-818-1000<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Good post i,ve seem so far. BTW i just re-up my account today and was given 15% bonus. Thank you...Royal.
Ken has acted as the true gentleman he is throughout this whole issue. Back in July, when he pulled Royal down, we kept constant correspondence . he was honest enough to admit that his money was against Royal .
He has been provided hard evidence of the changes we've made and what was the nature of the issues behind the situation back then.
We truly believe Ken has given Royal Sports the chance of being challenged, enabling us to give a tangible sign to the Industry : Royal Sports is here to stay.
When we discussed this bailout he gave us a chance to have a better knowledge of these players. We happen to disagree with the posters that have called this group "scams". They are sharps, but not "scams". They have all played with Royal in the past and we have not experienced any problem with any of them.
Sportsbooks are free to take or decline the action players give them. We feel that if a book doesn't like a certain kind of action it has the freedom to cap limits or boot the player . Books have the freedom of revoking bonuses. We find it unfair to confiscate a player's money only because he is a sharp or a wiseguy. if that was the case 95% of the posters here would have had their money confiscated everywhere.
GL to all.
Royal Sports
The Book of Kings
1-800-818-1000<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Good post i,ve seem so far. BTW i just re-up my account today and was given 15% bonus. Thank you...Royal.
Ken & Roberto,
Thanks for taking over the stiffed accounts at Ewinner. I look forward to plenty of activity at Royal. I for one, will give you no less than eight times my account balance, just for taking the pressure off of me and my friend. I can happily tell my friend the Ewinner account balance, minus the bonuses will be taken over by Royal. Now in my opinion "Super Royal".
Thanks again and a tip of the hat to both Royal and The Shrink for looking out for the players.
Thanks for taking over the stiffed accounts at Ewinner. I look forward to plenty of activity at Royal. I for one, will give you no less than eight times my account balance, just for taking the pressure off of me and my friend. I can happily tell my friend the Ewinner account balance, minus the bonuses will be taken over by Royal. Now in my opinion "Super Royal".
Thanks again and a tip of the hat to both Royal and The Shrink for looking out for the players.
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by mr Floppy:
the same old bunch of scammers gets paid again...<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Actually,6x rollover is not exaclity "gets paid".
However,kudos to Royal
If books want the players to regard them as banks,they should act like banks,and this is what Royal did here.
the same old bunch of scammers gets paid again...<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Actually,6x rollover is not exaclity "gets paid".
However,kudos to Royal
If books want the players to regard them as banks,they should act like banks,and this is what Royal did here.
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by BSkiller:
Halifax,
I'm still waiting for you to make a guess on which group i belong in ewinner issue. Post the IP address i belong to. I will send you any amount via neteller if you are correct.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
OK, BSKiller - you and "Homedawg" can send me my money now ... and if you're willing to send me "any amount via neteller", well hell, you might as well make it a lot.
"homedXXX: 65.199.3.142, 64.217.197.148, 64.218.133.167, 64.219.169.189, 65.70.164.158, 66.140.63.33
ctwallxxx: 65.199.3.142, 64.217.197.148, 64.218.133.167, 64.219.169.189, 65.70.164.158, 66.140.63.33
homedxxx: Deposited $2500 Withdrawals: $21165
ctwallaxxx: Deposited $5000 Withdrawals: $5000"
[This message was edited by Halifax on October 01, 2003 at 10:43 AM.]
Halifax,
I'm still waiting for you to make a guess on which group i belong in ewinner issue. Post the IP address i belong to. I will send you any amount via neteller if you are correct.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
OK, BSKiller - you and "Homedawg" can send me my money now ... and if you're willing to send me "any amount via neteller", well hell, you might as well make it a lot.
"homedXXX: 65.199.3.142, 64.217.197.148, 64.218.133.167, 64.219.169.189, 65.70.164.158, 66.140.63.33
ctwallxxx: 65.199.3.142, 64.217.197.148, 64.218.133.167, 64.219.169.189, 65.70.164.158, 66.140.63.33
homedxxx: Deposited $2500 Withdrawals: $21165
ctwallaxxx: Deposited $5000 Withdrawals: $5000"
[This message was edited by Halifax on October 01, 2003 at 10:43 AM.]
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by bettor1:
I look forward to plenty of activity at Royal. I for one, will give you no less than eight times my account balance, just for taking the pressure off of me and my friend. I can happily tell my friend the Ewinner account balance, minus the bonuses will be taken over by Royal."<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Bettor1- Are you offering 8 times the account balance because you already have 8 accounts there?
Royal Sports - I agree with you on not stiffing winners. However, keep your eyes on Bettor1. It is likely that he already has several accounts in your book. Be VERY specific with him about the rules for wager limits, bonuses and multiple accounts NOW. Check for any existing players in your system from Cranston, Rhode Island or zip code 02905.
Shrink- I was disappointed that you edited out identifying information on Bettor1 that Halifax found. The identification made by Dman was 2.5 years old in the forum, and should no longer have been a state secret. I'm all for the no-real-names policy, but in all my posts, I referred back to the Dman's original post which was 2.5 years old (though you finally edited it aas well, yesterday). I hope that you will make sure that Royal has enough information to detect if Bettor1 continues to have multiple accounts.
I look forward to plenty of activity at Royal. I for one, will give you no less than eight times my account balance, just for taking the pressure off of me and my friend. I can happily tell my friend the Ewinner account balance, minus the bonuses will be taken over by Royal."<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Bettor1- Are you offering 8 times the account balance because you already have 8 accounts there?
Royal Sports - I agree with you on not stiffing winners. However, keep your eyes on Bettor1. It is likely that he already has several accounts in your book. Be VERY specific with him about the rules for wager limits, bonuses and multiple accounts NOW. Check for any existing players in your system from Cranston, Rhode Island or zip code 02905.
Shrink- I was disappointed that you edited out identifying information on Bettor1 that Halifax found. The identification made by Dman was 2.5 years old in the forum, and should no longer have been a state secret. I'm all for the no-real-names policy, but in all my posts, I referred back to the Dman's original post which was 2.5 years old (though you finally edited it aas well, yesterday). I hope that you will make sure that Royal has enough information to detect if Bettor1 continues to have multiple accounts.
