All any of non-techy users need is to have a friendly relationship with numerous users who are solid techs and/or hacks.
By the year 2015 at the lastest, anyone who wants free access to the net will be able to get on with little trouble from most anywhere in the free world and definitely anywhere within North America, Europe, Eastern Asia and Australia
By the year 2015 at the lastest, anyone who wants free access to the net will be able to get on with little trouble from most anywhere in the free world and definitely anywhere within North America, Europe, Eastern Asia and Australia
i agree the internet will be a hard area to control but slowly over time they will gain some and for the general non techy savvy user it will move more to being like the TV in that it is a brainwashing machine and the content the the average user is exposed to is controlled to some extent
i know
in the end we just knats in the universe doing whatever gives us kicks till we croak
just get pissed off an government and the big corporations in bed with government continuously getting in the way of people doing that and training them to be stupid and lemmings and program them etc....
world will be here for a while till the sun envelops it 100s of millions of years from now
in the end we just knats in the universe doing whatever gives us kicks till we croak
just get pissed off an government and the big corporations in bed with government continuously getting in the way of people doing that and training them to be stupid and lemmings and program them etc....
world will be here for a while till the sun envelops it 100s of millions of years from now
End of July 2009
Mayhaps the best thing that ever happened to us all was the recent and utterly crushing implosion that took place in TotalRecall's poor, addled dome when the "swine flu" cases got their initial reports down in ol' Meh-hee-ko.
His drunken, late night rant carefully detailing the absolute end of the world within 90 days painted himself into such an irreversible corner that he may well be done with sharing his paranoid delusions here within the friendly confines of the Rx PoliticoPub
After a suspect is accused of hurting someone's cyber feelings, instead of being arrested, they will get put on the "no fly list." This will allow the commys to claim no one's rights are being taken away. After all, no one has a right to fly.
And naturally the "no fly list" will be expanded far beyond just flying.
And naturally the "no fly list" will be expanded far beyond just flying.
PG, why does that puzzle you?
Once you come to understand that there are tens of millions of people who right now could circumvent any attempt at government obstruction to the WWW, you can likely then further comprehend that those numbers will do nothing but increase.
And of course the people who know how to do this will work to share the information with as many other people as possible, as fast as possible.
Within the next five, maybe ten years max, most anyone who wants to will know how to get online regardless of any attempt(s) by government to obstruct access.
Once you come to understand that there are tens of millions of people who right now could circumvent any attempt at government obstruction to the WWW, you can likely then further comprehend that those numbers will do nothing but increase.
And of course the people who know how to do this will work to share the information with as many other people as possible, as fast as possible.
Within the next five, maybe ten years max, most anyone who wants to will know how to get online regardless of any attempt(s) by government to obstruct access.
Have any of you saying "no problem" actually READ the bill? Or do you just believe the government loves you and is trying to save you from "cyber bullying".
All someone has to do is sign an affidavit saying you "hurt their feelings" and you're slapped with a felony. A total assault and the end of the first ammendment if this passes. Rest assured it will be selectively enforced too.
All someone has to do is sign an affidavit saying you "hurt their feelings" and you're slapped with a felony. A total assault and the end of the first ammendment if this passes. Rest assured it will be selectively enforced too.
A friendly referral back to Page 1 and my first Reply
This bill will never even see the floor of Congress for a vote, because of course if passed into law it would immediately be revoked by the courts as unconstitutional.
But the intent in introducing the bill is not to get it passed.
Rather it is simply a cheap ploy to satisfy the angst of some well to do voters in these 14 congressional districts. The noted Congressmen will soak some folks for some decent donations because they are "responding to important constituent requests".
And when the bill dies the expected quick death, they'll suck a bit more mileage out of the deal by telling the involved constituents, "Oh, this is just evidence that those jerks in the Other Party don't care about our children. If not for their apathy, we would have got this bill passed just the way you wanted it."
These type of bullshit bills are introduced throughout the year, usually by lower level Congressmen and it's certainly not exclusive to either one party or the other.
Another one - (actually a Resolution...not a law) in same style is the one introduced a couple weeks back which if passed would declare 2010 "The Year of the Bible".
Of course it dies a deserved quick death since such a declaration by Congress would be patently unconstitutional. But the couple dozen backers of this one will play the same game. They'll get some donations from the Christian right for "trying to make it happen".
Then when it dies, they'll tell the Christian right, "Oh, it was a good resolution. But those Godless, Liberal, Bible Hating Democrats made it clear they would not allow it to pass."
blah blah blah
Expect to see these faux "bills" and "resolutions" to continue to be introduced at the rate of a handful every month from now until the end of time.
