Fat Tony said:jademan said:So the $100 reverse pays more????????
no
because on on $100 reverse you are risking $100 twice = $200 + 20 in juice final result $220 to win $400 = $110 to win $200
with a parlay you risk $100 once to win $260
what you are not understanding is on a reverse you pay the risk going forward and on the reverse it is like an exacta box in horses - 3 horses $ cost you $30 there are 6 combinations
jademan said:Fat Tony said:no
because on on $100 reverse you are risking $100 twice = $200 + 20 in juice final result $220 to win $400 = $110 to win $200
with a parlay you risk $100 once to win $260
what you are not understanding is on a reverse you pay the risk going forward and on the reverse it is like an exacta box in horses - 3 horses $ cost you $30 there are 6 combinations
You're not getting it. I'm losing my mind.
Is this not true??? You risk more with a reverse over a parlay to win more.
Fat Tony said:jademan said:There's no reason. It's a simple thing.
Bottom line. Your RISKING more with a reverse to WIN more compared to a parlay.
You are risking more with a reverse to win less as compared to a parlay
although there is a bit less risk-------- if your forward bet loses you have no action on the reverse therefore not paying the risk on the reverse------ if your forward bet wins you get paid (better than the payout for a straight bet) and the reverse goes - you pay the risk again for the reverse------- if the reverse loses you still get paid on the forward but you lose on the reverse-----------if the reverse also wins you have paid the risk twice and your win is less than that of the same risk and win of a parlay.