Vitterd: An Asset or Detriment to the Forum?

[SheriffJoe]

You wanna do a heads up ban bet where you decide what games I can use?

why are you such a fucking con man?

You have declined every bet offered to you because you're scared to death to post picks and now want me to accept a bet where you choose the games. Do you ever read what you type?

What part of "no steam allowed" do you not understand?

Your non-steam ("handicapped") games are losers - FACT.

 

[vitterd]

What part of "no steam allowed" do you not understand?

Your non-steam ("handicapped") games are losers - FACT.

Yeah, like Detriot last night and Colorado Monday night....both winners.

Youre lying again

 

[vitterd]

In no follow or bet on Sports Casper world, the score was 1 to 6.
So sometimes you bet the same way as steam, and you win
And sometimes you bet the same way as steam, and you lose
And sometimes you bet the opposite way of steam, and you win
and sometimes you bet the opposite way of steam, and you lose.
And that's supposed to prove something??? Got it.
And the sick thing is these pathetic losers religiously follow every bet you make, and hang on the results. I think they care more about your bets than you do.hno:

Here is what the problem for these two losers.....this is what is making them act like idiots:

Vitterd 182-158.....plus 22,000

Joe 0-12

Acebb 1-7 run and the quit

 

[SheriffJoe]

Yeah, like Detriot last night and Colorado Monday night....both winners.

Youre lying again

Ummm, no I'm not. If you separated your plays into two piles (steam vs non) the steam plays would show a profit and the "non" pile would not.

Period. End of story.

The fact you actually bring up individual games to "prove your point" is beyond laughable.

 

[SheriffJoe]

In no follow or bet on Sports Casper world, the score was 1 to 6.
So sometimes you bet the same way as steam, and you win
And sometimes you bet the same way as steam, and you lose
And sometimes you bet the opposite way of steam, and you win
and sometimes you bet the opposite way of steam, and you lose.
And that's supposed to prove something??? Got it.
And the sick thing is these pathetic losers religiously follow every bet you make, and hang on the results. I think they care more about your bets than you do.hno:

"my little PM birdies tell me you live in a purple flower patch and here's the pic!"

"I do despise lying hypocrites. And Internet stalking is nothing less than a crime."

 

[vitterd]

Ummm, no I'm not. If you separated your plays into two piles (steam vs non) the steam plays would show a profit and the "non" pile would not.

The fact you actually bring up individual games to "prove your point" is beyond laughable.

Let me get this straight.....you say it's a fact that "non steam games lose".... I give you two winners in past 3 nights that are non steam and win...and that's not proving my point?

Lmao.....you are such a fucking joke.

You are just a loser and that's the problem.

 

[The Guesser]

"my little PM birdies tell me you live in a purple flower patch and here's the pic!"

"I do despise lying hypocrites. And Internet stalking is nothing less than a crime."

Yeech. We don't need more pics of your Sexual fantasies, Purple Flower Gay boy. Nothing Hypocritical in the slightest, sicko. Stalk any Alaskan Real estate websites lately? Whats the score of the NBA game? 43-57? Was the steam on GS when they moved to a Favorite, or Cleveland when they moved back to favorite? Or GS when it moved back to pick'em? And which side would Vit be forced to take in your gutless contest, where you make all the rules?

 

[SheriffJoe]

Let me get this straight.....you say it's a fact that "non steam games lose".... I give you two winners in past 3 nights that are non steam and win...and that's not proving my point?

Lmao.....you are such a fucking joke.

You are just a loser and that's the problem.

Yes, over time the plays you post that go against the market and/or are "market neutral" will lose - like your KC bet tonight.

It's not a secret or a put down, it's a simple fact.

 

[The Guesser]

Ummm, no I'm not. If you separated your plays into two piles (steam vs non) the steam plays would show a profit and the "non" pile would not.

Period. End of story.

The fact you actually bring up individual games to "prove your point" is beyond laughable.

You're no doubt an expert on Piles, Purple Flower sicko. The fact that you would know or care, and actually keep track of what Vit plays are "steam" and "non steam", and keep track of which pile wins, and which pile loses shows how sick you are, and are just more characteristics of your sick, stalking personality.

 

[vitterd]

Yes, over time the plays you post that go against the market and/or are "market neutral" will lose - like your KC bet tonight.

It's not a secret or a put down, it's a simple fact.

So, I can't point to my two wins but you can point to my one loss tonight. Ok....that makes sense. face)(*^%

 

[SheriffJoe]

You're no doubt an expert on Piles, Purple Flower sicko. The fact that you would know or care, and actually keep track of what Vit plays are "steam" and "non steam", and keep track of which pile wins, and which pile loses shows how sick you are, and are just more characteristics of your sick, stalking personality.

I'm not "tracking" vtard's plays, idiot...every time a sports book sneezes (point spreads, MLs, totals) I know about it.

So when vtard claims "I do my own handicapping and don't pay attention to line moves" I know for a fact he's lying.

 

[SheriffJoe]

So, I can't point to my two wins but you can point to my one loss tonight. Ok....that makes sense. face)(*^%

You can cherry pick two random wins, it doesn't prove a thing. Your non-steam games lose more often than they win.

 

[vitterd]

You can cherry pick two random wins, it doesn't prove a thing. Your non-steam games lose more often than they win.

just because you keep saying it....doesn't make it true. Blindly following steam isn't a winning formula. If it was ....everybody would just do that. I'm 23 games over 500, plus 22 dimes....and I rarely play anything over 140.....very rare. It's no accident and it isn't just blindly following steam.....that's you having to believe that to diminish what I'm doing in baseball.

 

[vitterd]

I'm not "tracking" vtard's plays, idiot...every time a sports book sneezes (point spreads, MLs, totals) I know about it.

So when vtard claims "I do my own handicapping and don't pay attention to line moves" I know for a fact he's lying.

Youre tracking my plays....you post about my plays 5 minutes after I post them.

 

[The Guesser]

I'm not "tracking" vtard's plays, idiot...every time a sports book sneezes (point spreads, MLs, totals) I know about it.

So when vtard claims "I do my own handicapping and don't pay attention to line moves" I know for a fact he's lying.

And yet you run like the gutless coward you are, whenever Vit proposes a Ban bet based on picks, unless it now has the ridiculous added stipulation that YOU can pick the games he uses. You are a complete gutless coward fruit, and totally full of shit. You shouldn't leave the Purple flower patch.

 

[SheriffJoe]

just because you keep saying it....doesn't make it true. Blindly following steam isn't a winning formula. If it was ....everybody would just do that. I'm 23 games over 500, plus 22 dimes....and I rarely play anything over 140.....very rare. It's no accident and it isn't just blindly following steam.....that's you having to believe that to diminish what I'm doing in baseball.

I have never said following blind steam is a winning formula - EVER.

If you didn't care about which way the market was leaning, you wouldn't post your plays so close to the first pitch. You'd do your capping early (after the lineups were released) and post them. The fact you wait till minutes before these games close is another indicator you're full of shit.

 

[vitterd]

I have never said following blind steam is a winning formula - EVER.

If you didn't care about which way the market was leaning, you wouldn't post your plays so close to the first pitch. You'd do your capping early (after the lineups were released) and post them. The fact you wait till minutes before these games close is another indicator you're full of shit.

I posted plays early at times.....and you guys said I was using 10am steam. It really doesn't matter when I post, you guys will always come up with the same shit.

 

[SheriffJoe]

And yet you run like the gutless coward you are, whenever Vit proposes a Ban bet based on picks, unless it now has the ridiculous added stipulation that YOU can pick the games he uses. You are a complete gutless coward fruit, and totally full of shit. You shouldn't leave the Purple flower patch.

I've proposed multiple bets (sportsbook account balances, his "fake ticket" nonsense etc.) - predictably, he's run from all of them. It's like the boy who cried wolf.

I don't take anything he says seriously anymore.

vtard: Okay Willie, how much?

Willie: 2K

vtard: No way! That's way too little, don't waste my time...10k!

 

[The Guesser]

I have never said following blind steam is a winning formula - EVER.

If you didn't care about which way the market was leaning, you wouldn't post your plays so close to the first pitch. You'd do your capping early (after the lineups were released) and post them. The fact you wait till minutes before these games close is another indicator you're full of shit.

Why do you lie so much? I'm not gonna go back and track every Vit play, and when he released them, I'll leave that to sick Obsessed psychopaths like Lying WELCHING Ace and you, but just a look at today shows your Full of Shit.
06-08-2016, 06:39 PM

Originally Posted by vitterd





Kc+137
Seattle -106
Boston-122

Cavs-1(-120)
Plays posted by Vit at 6:39 PM​

Seattle Game time 10:10 PM
Boston Game rime 10:15 PM
Cavs Game time 9 PM.

 

[vitterd]

I've proposed multiple bets (sportsbook account balances, his "fake ticket" nonsense etc.) - predictably, he's run from all of them. It's like the boy who cried wolf.

I don't take anything he says seriously anymore.

vtard: Okay Willie, how much?

Willie: 2K

vtard: No way! That's way too little, don't waste my time...10k!

You are a known con man.....my only bets with you would be post up and verified. This is a gambling site.....people have been saying you don't gamble since you were Joe C and you've done nothing to prove otherwise.

I have offered you 9 difft bets that involve money, bans or both. You have run from all of them. Simply because you're scared to post picks....and we all know why.