Indirectly? Yes.
Bush waged and illegal war against Iraq knowing damn well that thousands of innocents would perish. Berg happens to be one of thousands of different people that have died as a results of the war-evading "war president"'s choice to invade Iraq despite having no substantial premise for the invasion.
He didn't care that thousands would die then.
And he doesn't care that thousands have died now.
He is an evil criminal and should be tried by the international community for his crimes against humanity.
Bush waged and illegal war against Iraq knowing damn well that thousands of innocents would perish. Berg happens to be one of thousands of different people that have died as a results of the war-evading "war president"'s choice to invade Iraq despite having no substantial premise for the invasion.
He didn't care that thousands would die then.
And he doesn't care that thousands have died now.
He is an evil criminal and should be tried by the international community for his crimes against humanity.
Indirectly?...NO!
Is Bush responsible for the deaths of US soldiers, the answer is yes. For Berg…NO!!!
The reason is that Berg went to Iraq looking for a job. Not only that, but he went to Iraq via going to Israel and crossing the border. You can’t be more naïve than that, especially for ALL MUSLIM hatred against Israel.
Is Bush responsible for the deaths of US soldiers, the answer is yes. For Berg…NO!!!
The reason is that Berg went to Iraq looking for a job. Not only that, but he went to Iraq via going to Israel and crossing the border. You can’t be more naïve than that, especially for ALL MUSLIM hatred against Israel.
There's a world of difference between a misspelled word and a complete misunderstanding of a word's meaning.
btw - "are you illiterate or are you a fu**in moron." is a question, not a statement, so you should consider showing a little patriotism and having a bit more pride in the english grammar.
btw - "are you illiterate or are you a fu**in moron." is a question, not a statement, so you should consider showing a little patriotism and having a bit more pride in the english grammar.
Yes, he probably would have been decapitated even had the US not gone to war with Iraq.
You may not keep up with the news, but Muslim extremists in other parts of the world have decapitated American hostages several times in the last few years, prior to this war.
And Berg seemed to be at the least likely to put himself into a trouble spot somewhere. His death is his own fault, and the only blame that can be laid is at the people who actually committed the act of killing him.
You may not keep up with the news, but Muslim extremists in other parts of the world have decapitated American hostages several times in the last few years, prior to this war.
And Berg seemed to be at the least likely to put himself into a trouble spot somewhere. His death is his own fault, and the only blame that can be laid is at the people who actually committed the act of killing him.
"Yes, he probably would have been decapitated even had the US not gone to war with Iraq.
You may not keep up with the news, but Muslim extremists in other parts of the world have decapitated American hostages several times in the last few years, prior to this war."
Your statement equates to saying that the majority of Americans going to Iraq prior to the war were decapitated.*
Is this the assertion that you intended to convey?
* Ideally this would be a time based formula, but you mentioned nothing of the sort.
You may not keep up with the news, but Muslim extremists in other parts of the world have decapitated American hostages several times in the last few years, prior to this war."
Your statement equates to saying that the majority of Americans going to Iraq prior to the war were decapitated.*
Is this the assertion that you intended to convey?
* Ideally this would be a time based formula, but you mentioned nothing of the sort.
