United States Austerity: Government now spending less nominally than Bush

[akphidelt]

Except this isn't "data" at all.

The fact that you don't understand that speaks volumes.

Lmao! Annualized growth of federal spending is data. The fact you don't understand that speaks volumes.

 

[akphidelt]

"The government has relatively spent less than any time in the past 6 decades"

ointer:

Do you understand what relativity means? Probably the same understanding you have of what "nominal" means, lol. Probably one of the more entertaining convos I've had. You are embarrassing yourself.

 

[Acebb]

The data speaks for itself...

This "data" you keep stupidly posting was laughed at by the Washington Post.

Which of course is why you keep posting it.

 

[SheriffJoe]

You are making up data...

You're a Keynesian - that's your job, Magic Man.

 

[akphidelt]

Like, you're fucking clueless

You keep showing a "% of GDP". And I keep telling you, maybe GDP decreased or grew slowly, lol. Do you not understand basic mathematics?

 

[Acebb]

Lmao! Annualized growth of federal spending is data. The fact you don't understand that speaks volumes.

The
Chart
You
Keep
Posting
Is
Fake
And
Bullshit


So you should probably stop posting it now.

 

[akphidelt]

This "data" you keep stupidly posting was laughed at by the Washington Post.

Which of course is why you keep posting it.

The data is just basic data. The Washington Post has opinions just like you. Which makes you look really dumb. But you are a conservative.

 

[Acebb]

You keep showing a "% of GDP". And I keep telling you, maybe GDP decreased or grew slowly, lol. Do you not understand basic mathematics?

You don't see to understand how moronic this response is in defense of a claim of spending in comparison to past Presidents

 

[akphidelt]

The
Chart
You
Keep
Posting
Is
Fake
And
Bullshit


So you should probably stop posting it now.

It's actually real and I'll keep posting it. I know facts make you uneasy. Your bad.

 

[akphidelt]

You don't see to understand how moronic this response is in defense of a claim of spending in comparison to past Presidents

You don't seem to understand how moronic you look using % of GDP to compare spending of past Presidents. Do you understand basic math?

 

[akphidelt]

You're a Keynesian - that's your job, Magic Man.

I just use real data and facts. I understand that looks like magic to you.

 

[Acebb]

The data is just basic data. The Washington Post has opinions just like you. Which makes you look really dumb. But you are a conservative.

It isn't "basic data"

The information was manipulated.

Which is why the Associated Press and Washington Post destroyed it.

What is funny is you went from saying "fact" (to represent that silly, fake chart) to saying now someone else has "opinions" about this data you don't understand.

 

[Acebb]

You don't seem to understand how moronic you look using % of GDP to compare spending of past Presidents. Do you understand basic math?

You don't even understand what these words mean.

You are not applying "basic math"

You don't even have the most basic understanding of this topic.

Saying "GDP grew slowly" isn't responsive to the chart.

 

[Acebb]

Austerity!

 

[akphidelt]

It isn't "basic data"

The information was manipulated.

Which is why the Associated Press and Washington Post destroyed it.

What is funny is you went from saying "fact" (to represent that silly, fake chart) to saying now someone else has "opinions" about this data you don't understand.

It's not manipulated at all. You can see the actual data from the actual source. Trying to use % of GDP is absolutely hilarious. Nice try clown.

 

[akphidelt]

Austerity!

I don't think you know what austerity is. You keep showing "% of GDP" lol, yet you don't realize what I mean when I say what if GDP decreases?

 

[Acebb]

You don't seem to understand how moronic you look using % of GDP to compare spending of past Presidents. Do you understand basic math?

Um, when the spending records of Presidents are examined, it is as a % of GDP. For example:

Until Barack Obama took office in 2009, the United States had never spent more than 23.5% of GDP, with the exception of the World War II years of 1942-1946. Here’s the Obama spending record:
– 25.2% of GDP in 2009
– 24.1% of GDP in 2010
– 24.1% of GDP in 2011

You quite literally do not know what all of this means.

I suggested you shut up 30 minutes ago, yet you keep doubling down on stupid.

 

[Acebb]

It's not manipulated at all.

Note:

I wasn't referring to that chart.

 

[Acebb]

I don't think you know what austerity is. You keep showing "% of GDP" lol, yet you don't realize what I mean when I say what if GDP decreases?

Hysterical.

You quite literally do not know anything about this topic.

 

[SheriffJoe]

I just use real data and facts. I understand that looks like magic to you.

You use manipulated graphs from far left bloogers and Democrat campaigns. lol