United States Austerity: Government now spending less nominally than Bush

Search

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,902
Tokens
Never said Presidents spend on a state level. You are just very confused.

Really dope?

then why do you keep saying "nobody is arguing that Bush spent more on a federal level" and posting meaningless charts with state spending?
 

Life's a bitch, then you die!
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
28,910
Tokens
note_taking.jpg
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,902
Tokens
So let's go real slow for the jokers in here.

Obama added $450 B to Bush's last (FY '08) budget.

Obama is going to spend $3.7 trillion this year.

That's how you get a $1.4 T increase.
 
Joined
Sep 14, 2007
Messages
5,579
Tokens
Now when Bush took office, the spending in 2000 was at 1789B, but when Bush left it was 2982B. He rose the baseline 1193B. Obama won't come close to raising it that much in his 8 years.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
Really dope?

then why do you keep saying "nobody is arguing that Bush spent more on a federal level" and posting meaningless charts with state spending?

Austerity includes state and local government spending. I was simply showing nominally that under Obama the government at all levels has spent less than Bush. Which is astounding if you understand economics. Which clearly you don't.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,902
Tokens
So from FY 2007 to FY 2014 outlays are going from $2.7T to $3.7 T

And someone is actually saying that there is austerity.

Parody
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,902
Tokens
Now when Bush took office, the spending in 2000 was at 1789B, but when Bush left it was 2982B. He rose the baseline 1193B. Obama won't come close to raising it that much in his 8 years.

Obama added $450 B to FY 2008.

Stop assigning $2.982 T to Bush.

Thanks.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
Now when Bush took office, the spending in 2000 was at 1789B, but when Bush left it was 2982B. He rose the baseline 1193B. Obama won't come close to raising it that much in his 8 years.

That's an interesting way to look at it. Obama in 8 years at a nominal spending level will have increased spending less than Bush. That is just unreal.
 
Joined
Sep 14, 2007
Messages
5,579
Tokens
So let's go real slow for the jokers in here.

Obama added $450 B to Bush's last (FY '08) budget.

Obama is going to spend $3.7 trillion this year.

That's how you get a $1.4 T increase.
You are too fucking stupid. It's useless trying to explain this to you because you can't add subtract or anything. Even if you did understand and I proved you wrong which you are and I've already proved it, you would never admit it. I'm out of here.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,902
Tokens
Now when Bush took office, the spending in 2000 was at 1789B, but when Bush left it was 2982B. He rose the baseline 1193B. Obama won't come close to raising it that much in his 8 years.

Because of the big jump from FY 2008 to 2009 Obama will only increase the spend to just over $4.2 T by the time he leaves office.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,902
Tokens
By the way, Bush didn't leave office at the end of FY 2008.

The left tried to say that the FY 09 budget was his.

Obama added $450 B to the FY '09 budget. Not the 08 budget.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,902
Tokens
That's an interesting way to look at it. Obama in 8 years at a nominal spending level will have increased spending less than Bush. That is just unreal.

Actually, it isn't 'unreal' at all. Since Obama had a hand in a huge jump and making the budget explode.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,902
Tokens
When Obama leaves office the budget estimate is $4.27 T

When Obama walked in the door, the Budget was $3.517

That isn't anything to brag about.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
There's the conservative world and then there's the real world...

Larry Summers testified that further austerity measures are not the right choice for the United States at this time: “First, it would not be desirable to undertake further measures to rapidly reduce deficits in the short run. Excessively rapid fiscal consolidation in an economy that is still constrained by lack of demand, and where space for monetary policy action is limited, risks slowing economic expansion at best and halting recovery at worst.”

Simon Johnson agreed that “a sudden move towards further tightening fiscal policy in the U.S. would undermine our economic recovery and has the potential to destabilize financial markets. We are currently moving in a precipitate manner towards an excessive and inappropriate degree of immediate austerity” and “It is far more important to get the economy back onto a sustainable growth path.”

“I have long believed that the case for austerity during times of economic weakness has been fundamentally flawed. When demand falls off in the private sector and millions of workers are losing their jobs—I think the last thing government should do is make things worse by slashing spending and causing aggregate demand to drop even further.”

---------------------------------------------
http://www.budget.senate.gov/democr...Group_id=d68d31c2-2e75-49fb-a03a-be915cb4550b

These are just normal statements from normal economists. Anyone in the academic world that has knowledge of economics understands what the Republicans are doing to the economy. To bad we can't be more like Reagan and spend like crazy!
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,430
Tokens
fratfraud just isn't very bright...neither is Janet Yellen, Obama's Keynesian Fed Chairman...the type of academic Monopoly Money idiot fratfraud worships:

“For my own part,” Ms. Yellen said, “I did not see and did not appreciate what the risks were with securitization, the credit ratings agencies, the shadow banking system, the S.I.V.’s — I didn’t see any of that coming until it happened.”

So if she didn't see the last crisis coming, will she see the next one?

Answer: Captain Obvious to the rescue!

Dumb bitch.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
fratfraud just isn't very bright...neither is Janet Yellen, Obama's Keynesian Fed Chairman...the type of academic Monopoly Money idiot fratfraud worships:

“For my own part,” Ms. Yellen said, “I did not see and did not appreciate what the risks were with securitization, the credit ratings agencies, the shadow banking system, the S.I.V.’s — I didn’t see any of that coming until it happened.”

So if she didn't see the last crisis coming, will she see the next one?

Answer: Captain Obvious to the rescue!

Dumb bitch.

Lol, this coming from the guy that said all our wealth was in place before the Fed, 100 years ago. You obviously have mental problems that have been accumulating for decades. Sucks that you are going to have to live in your entire life like a retard.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,902
Tokens
I've always enjoyed this from Larry Summers:

What Causes Long-Term Unemployment?

To fully understand unemployment, we must consider the causes of recorded long-term unemployment. Empirical evidence shows that two causes are welfare payments and unemployment insurance. These government assistance programs contribute to long-term unemployment in two ways.

Nancy Pelosi, call your office!
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
I've always enjoyed this from Larry Summers:

What Causes Long-Term Unemployment?

To fully understand unemployment, we must consider the causes of recorded long-term unemployment. Empirical evidence shows that two causes are welfare payments and unemployment insurance. These government assistance programs contribute to long-term unemployment in two ways.

Nancy Pelosi, call your office!

The funny thing is you think I'm arguing against this.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
You're just looking for attention troll.

I bet you're like super busy at work today too!

You are just entertaining. It's hilarious watching someone who thinks they know what they are talking about looking like an idiot. And what's crazy is this is all low level economic stuff that you can't comprehend. We haven't even come close to talk about real world monetary and fiscal policy. That's how dumb you guys are.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,991
Messages
13,575,934
Members
100,889
Latest member
junkerb
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com